Nonoperative and Operative Soft-Tissue and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Knee: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Review.


Journal

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2021
accepted: 05 04 2021
entrez: 6 8 2021
pubmed: 7 8 2021
medline: 3 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include: drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electro-magnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the knee, including symptomatic osteoarthritis and chondral injuries, as well as injuries to tendon, meniscus, and ligament, including the anterior cruciate ligament. Promising and established treatment modalities include hyaluronic acid (HA) in liquid or scaffold form; platelet-rich plasma (PRP); bone marrow aspirate (BMA) comprising mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and growth factors; connective tissue progenitor cells (CTPs) including adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) and tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs); matrix cell-based therapy including autologous chondrocytes or allograft; vitamin D; and fibrin clot. Future investigations should standardize solution preparations, because inconsistent results reported may be due to heterogeneity of HA, PRP, BMAC, or MSC preparations and regimens, which may inhibit meaningful comparison between studies to determine the true efficacy and safety for each treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34353568
pii: S0749-8063(21)00320-0
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biological Products 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2704-2721

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Derrick M Knapik (DM)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Aghogho Evuarherhe (A)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Rachel M Frank (RM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.

Matthias Steinwachs (M)

SportClinic Zurich Hirslanden Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.

Scott Rodeo (S)

HSS Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Marcus Mumme (M)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and University Children's Hospital Basel, and Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Brian J Cole (BJ)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.. Electronic address: brian.cole@rushortho.com.

Articles similaires

Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena
Curcumin Spinal Cord Injuries Humans Animals Neural Stem Cells
Animals Osteogenesis Osteoporosis Mesenchymal Stem Cells Humans

Identification of CD141

Gabee Park, Dae Yeon Hwang, Do Young Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Mesenchymal Stem Cells Animals Mice Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation

Classifications MeSH