Clinical outcomes of revision arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies.


Journal

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
ISSN: 1532-6500
Titre abrégé: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206499

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 22 03 2021
revised: 12 06 2021
accepted: 28 06 2021
pubmed: 7 8 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 6 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to review the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, recurrence rates, and subsequent revision rates following revision arthroscopic Bankart repair. Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies in which arthroscopic Bankart repair was performed as a revision procedure were included. The clinical outcomes extracted and analyzed were functional outcomes, return to play, and recurrent instability. Fourteen studies with 433 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were male patients (63.7%); the average age was 26.1 years (range, 14-58 years), and the mean follow-up period was 37.6 months (range, 10-144 months). The mean Rowe score was 84.2, and 79.7% of patients had good to excellent outcomes. The rate of return to play was 78.5%, with 47.5% of patients returning to their preinjury level of play across 10 studies. The rate of recurrent instability was reported in 12 studies, with 328 shoulders demonstrating 86 instability events (26.2%). The rate of recurrent instability due to dislocation was reported in 7 studies (n = 176), with 19 events (10.8%), whereas the rate of subluxation was reported in 4 studies (n = 76), with 6 events (7.9%). Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability was shown to result in a high rate of recurrent shoulder instability. There was a relatively poor rate of return to sport among athletes, and only about half of the patients were able to return at or above their preoperative level of ability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to review the literature to ascertain the functional outcomes, recurrence rates, and subsequent revision rates following revision arthroscopic Bankart repair.
METHODS METHODS
Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies in which arthroscopic Bankart repair was performed as a revision procedure were included. The clinical outcomes extracted and analyzed were functional outcomes, return to play, and recurrent instability.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fourteen studies with 433 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were male patients (63.7%); the average age was 26.1 years (range, 14-58 years), and the mean follow-up period was 37.6 months (range, 10-144 months). The mean Rowe score was 84.2, and 79.7% of patients had good to excellent outcomes. The rate of return to play was 78.5%, with 47.5% of patients returning to their preinjury level of play across 10 studies. The rate of recurrent instability was reported in 12 studies, with 328 shoulders demonstrating 86 instability events (26.2%). The rate of recurrent instability due to dislocation was reported in 7 studies (n = 176), with 19 events (10.8%), whereas the rate of subluxation was reported in 4 studies (n = 76), with 6 events (7.9%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability was shown to result in a high rate of recurrent shoulder instability. There was a relatively poor rate of return to sport among athletes, and only about half of the patients were able to return at or above their preoperative level of ability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34358668
pii: S1058-2746(21)00572-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

209-216

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jonathan D Haskel (JD)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.haskel@nyulangone.org.

Karina H Wang (KH)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Eoghan T Hurley (ET)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Danielle H Markus (DH)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Kirk A Campbell (KA)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Michael J Alaia (MJ)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Peter J Millett (PJ)

Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.

Laith M Jazrawi (LM)

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH