Collagen Fibres Orientation in the Bone Matrix around Dental Implants: Does the Implant's Thread Design Play a Role?
birefringence analysis
circularly polarized light
collagen fibres orientation
dental implant
immediate loading
thread shape
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2021
23 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
revised:
21
07
2021
accepted:
22
07
2021
entrez:
7
8
2021
pubmed:
8
8
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of different thread shapes of titanium dental implant on the bone collagen fibre orientation (BCFO) around loaded implants. Twenty titanium dental implants, divided for thread shapes in six groups (A-F) were analysed in the present study. All implants were immediately loaded and left in function for 6 months before retrieval. The parameters evaluated under scanning electron microscope were the thread width, thread depth, top radius of curvature, flank angle, and the inter-thread straight section. Two undecalcified histological sections were prepared from each implant. Birefringence analysis using circularly polarized light microscopy was used to quantitively measure BCFO. For groups A-F, respectively, transverse BCFO was 32.7%, 24.1%, 22.3%, 18.2%, 32.4%, and 21.2%, longitudinal BCFO was 28.2%, 14.5%, 44.9%, 33.1%, 37.7%, and 40.2%. The percentage differences between transverse and longitudinal orientation were 4.50% (A), 9.60% (B), -22.60% (C), -14.90% (D), -5.30% (E), and -19.00% (F). Following loading, the amount of transverse and longitudinal BCFO were significantly influenced by the thread shape. The greater flank angles and narrower inter-thread sections of the "V" shaped and "concave" shaped implant threads of groups A and B, respectively, promoted the predominance of transverse BCFO, compared to groups C-F (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34360630
pii: ijms22157860
doi: 10.3390/ijms22157860
pmc: PMC8346163
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Fibrillar Collagens
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003 Dec;275(2):1081-101
pubmed: 14613308
Biomaterials. 2012 May;33(15):3813-23
pubmed: 22364700
Adv Dent Res. 1999 Jun;13:99-119
pubmed: 11276755
J Biomech. 2010 May 7;43(7):1251-61
pubmed: 20170921
Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):70-6
pubmed: 16569964
J Biomech. 2003 Sep;36(9):1247-58
pubmed: 12893033
Anat Rec. 1987 Sep;219(1):1-9
pubmed: 3688455
Nature. 2001 Aug 9;412(6847):603-4
pubmed: 11493908
J Periodontol. 2005 Jan;76(1):83-9
pubmed: 15830641
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1 Suppl 1):37-41
pubmed: 17897500
Comput Biol Med. 2018 May 1;96:157-165
pubmed: 29587150
J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Apr;55(1):63-71
pubmed: 11426399
Implant Dent. 2013 Feb;22(1):91-6
pubmed: 23287982
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010 Summer;7(2):70-5
pubmed: 22013460
J Periodontol. 2006 Feb;77(2):152-60
pubmed: 16460238
J Dent. 2007 Jan;35(1):84-92
pubmed: 16979279
J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(4):177-81
pubmed: 17009562
J Orthop Res. 2001 Nov;19(6):1021-6
pubmed: 11781000
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):1-10
pubmed: 18205845
J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jun;29(6):565-74
pubmed: 12071926
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1993 Mar;187(3):231-8
pubmed: 8470823
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):e64-71
pubmed: 23527370
J Biomech. 2010 Jun 18;43(9):1761-70
pubmed: 20202639
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):538-46
pubmed: 15889437