Useful Technique for Creating a Good Liver Parenchymal Visual Transection Plane During Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy.
Journal
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Aug 2021
09 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
05
05
2021
accepted:
01
06
2021
pubmed:
10
8
2021
medline:
8
2
2022
entrez:
9
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Creating a good surgical visual field is one of the most important factors for performing a successful surgery. Here, we introduce a useful technique for creating a good liver parenchymal visual transection plane during laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and compare the perioperative outcomes of our current technique with those of conventional techniques. We reviewed the data of patients who underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy between July 2016 and December 2020. The current technique for creating transection planes was first applied in our department in April 2019. The patients were divided into conventional (forceps) and current (silicone ring) technique groups, depending on the surgical technique. Twenty-eight and 12 patients underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy using the conventional and current techniques, respectively, when the difficulty level-as determined by IWATE criteria-was low. Although the tumor size was significantly larger (median: 22.5 vs. 15 mm, P=0.04) in the current technique group, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (median: 50 vs. 100 mL, P=0.01), and the median surgical margin was significantly longer (median: 7 vs. 3 mm, P=0.02). There were no significant between-group differences in surgical time (median: 344 vs. 240 min, P=0.14), postoperative hospital stay duration (median: 11 vs. 9.5 d, P=0.051), and the incidence of complications (P=0.63). We believe that the technique involving the use of a silicone ring can result in better surgical outcomes as it provides a good visual hepatic transection plane during laparoscopic partial hepatectomy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Creating a good surgical visual field is one of the most important factors for performing a successful surgery. Here, we introduce a useful technique for creating a good liver parenchymal visual transection plane during laparoscopic partial hepatectomy and compare the perioperative outcomes of our current technique with those of conventional techniques.
METHODS
METHODS
We reviewed the data of patients who underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy between July 2016 and December 2020. The current technique for creating transection planes was first applied in our department in April 2019. The patients were divided into conventional (forceps) and current (silicone ring) technique groups, depending on the surgical technique.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-eight and 12 patients underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy using the conventional and current techniques, respectively, when the difficulty level-as determined by IWATE criteria-was low. Although the tumor size was significantly larger (median: 22.5 vs. 15 mm, P=0.04) in the current technique group, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (median: 50 vs. 100 mL, P=0.01), and the median surgical margin was significantly longer (median: 7 vs. 3 mm, P=0.02). There were no significant between-group differences in surgical time (median: 344 vs. 240 min, P=0.14), postoperative hospital stay duration (median: 11 vs. 9.5 d, P=0.051), and the incidence of complications (P=0.63).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We believe that the technique involving the use of a silicone ring can result in better surgical outcomes as it provides a good visual hepatic transection plane during laparoscopic partial hepatectomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34369477
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000989
pii: 00129689-202202000-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-45Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Hwang DW, Han HS, Yoon YS, et al. Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:125–130.
Ito K, Ito H, Are C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched-pair case control study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2276–2283.
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–841.
Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Sasaki A, et al. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy as a training procedure for surgeons learning laparoscopic hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:525–530.
Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:745–753.
Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5:281–289.
Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic hand-assisted hepatic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2001;8:104–113.
Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Conlon KC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: lessons from an initial experience. Arch Surg. 2000;135:854–859.
Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, et al. Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2247–2258.
Han HS, Shehta A, Ahn S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: case-matched study with propensity score matching. J Hepatol. 2015;63:643–650.