'…the way it was staffed during COVID is the way it should be staffed in real life…': a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 on the working conditions of junior hospital doctors.
COVID-19
health policy
human resource management
organisation of health services
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2021
09 08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
10
8
2021
pubmed:
11
8
2021
medline:
14
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
COVID-19 has prompted the reconfiguration of hospital services and medical workforces in countries across the world, bringing significant transformations to the work environments of hospital doctors. Before the pandemic, the working conditions of hospital doctors in Ireland were characterised by understaffing, overload, long hours and work-life conflict. As working conditions can affect staff well-being, workforce retention and patient outcomes, the objective of this study was to analyse how the pandemic and health system response impacted junior hospital doctors' working conditions during the first wave of COVID-19 in Ireland. Using a qualitative study design, the article draws on semi-structured interviews with 30 junior hospital doctors. Informed by an abductive approach that draws iteratively on existing literature and empirical data to explain unexpected observations, data were analysed using inductive and deductive coding techniques to identify the key themes reflecting the experiences of working in Irish hospitals during the first wave of COVID-19. We use the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research to present this research. Our analysis generated three themes which demonstrate how COVID-19 prompted changes in medical staffing which in turn enhanced interviewees' work environments. First, interviewees felt there were more doctors staffing the hospital wards during the first wave of the pandemic. Second, this had positive implications for a range of factors important to their experience of work, including the ability to take sick leave, workplace relationships, collective workplace morale, access to senior clinical support and the speed of clinical decision-making. Third, interviewees noted how it took a pandemic for these improvements to occur and cautioned against a return to pre-pandemic medical staffing levels, which had negatively impacted their working conditions and well-being. Interviewees' experience of the first wave of COVID-19 illustrates how enhanced levels of medical staffing can improve junior hospital doctors' working conditions. Given the pervasive impact of staffing on the quality of interviewees' work experience, perhaps it is time to consider medical staffing standards as a vital job resource for hospital doctors and a key policy lever to enhance medical workforce retention. In a global context of sustained COVID-19 demands, pressures from delayed care and international health worker shortages, understanding frontline experiences and identifying strategies to improve them are vital to the development of more sustainable work practices and to improve doctor retention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34373310
pii: bmjopen-2021-050358
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050358
pmc: PMC8354756
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e050358Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Oct 01;9(10):459-460
pubmed: 32610800
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1;59(8):1804-1807
pubmed: 32594148
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Mar 3;19(1):29
pubmed: 33658051
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):
pubmed: 33669828
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Apr 22;:
pubmed: 32610753
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):419-429
pubmed: 32923355
BMJ. 2020 Oct 28;371:m3582
pubmed: 33115726
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):e475-e483
pubmed: 32745512
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):467-473
pubmed: 33551205
Nurs Stand. 2018 Jul 30;33(5):27-31
pubmed: 30039935
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 10;9(3):e025433
pubmed: 30853661
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 09;6(2):e008751
pubmed: 26861934
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 25;7(10):e018462
pubmed: 29074517
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Oct 31;18(1):83
pubmed: 33129313
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e033525
pubmed: 31964674
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):58-60
pubmed: 32349550
Thorax. 2020 Dec;75(12):1089-1094
pubmed: 32917840
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e790-e798
pubmed: 32573443
JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93
pubmed: 12387650
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e040503
pubmed: 33154060
Health Policy. 2014 Sep;117(3):275-8
pubmed: 25082466
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):144
pubmed: 29486756
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2192-2204
pubmed: 32865149
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;30(Suppl_4):iv32-iv35
pubmed: 32894279
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Dec 28;15(1):87
pubmed: 29282076
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):106-15
pubmed: 24019507
Hum Resour Health. 2019 May 28;17(1):36
pubmed: 31138211
Lancet. 2018 Mar 3;391(10123):833-834
pubmed: 29508738
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2133-2134
pubmed: 32259193
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 9;17(1):97
pubmed: 31815621