Health-promoting and -impeding aspects of using peer-learning during clinical practice education: A qualitative study.


Journal

Nurse education in practice
ISSN: 1873-5223
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Pract
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101090848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 15 05 2020
revised: 23 07 2021
accepted: 02 08 2021
pubmed: 14 8 2021
medline: 24 9 2021
entrez: 13 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of the present study was to elucidate health-promoting and -impeding aspects of peer-learning by examining nursing students' descriptions of learning together as peers, and how this might interact with their health. Peer-learning is a useful strategy for teaching and learning in nursing students' clinical practice education. In the research, benefits such as improved cooperation and increased self-confidence have been described and labelled as health-promoting. A qualitative descriptive approach METHOD: Thirteen first-year nursing students aged 22-45 years, who had completed their first clinical practice education on a medical or surgical hospital ward, participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Working as a pair was primarily described as positive, as the peers felt basic support from each other, even though they described negative experiences that limited their own development and challenged their patience. Peer-learning as a model for supervision in clinical practice incorporates valuable health-promoting aspects, as the students felt safe, supported, increased self-confidence, and participation. The interaction between peers helped them grow as human beings, and the mutual support the peers felt was a vital health-promoting aspect that limited the impact of the described health-impeding aspects, which included sometimes finding peer-learning trying, stressful and irritating.

Sections du résumé

AIM OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to elucidate health-promoting and -impeding aspects of peer-learning by examining nursing students' descriptions of learning together as peers, and how this might interact with their health.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Peer-learning is a useful strategy for teaching and learning in nursing students' clinical practice education. In the research, benefits such as improved cooperation and increased self-confidence have been described and labelled as health-promoting.
DESIGN METHODS
A qualitative descriptive approach METHOD: Thirteen first-year nursing students aged 22-45 years, who had completed their first clinical practice education on a medical or surgical hospital ward, participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULT RESULTS
Working as a pair was primarily described as positive, as the peers felt basic support from each other, even though they described negative experiences that limited their own development and challenged their patience.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Peer-learning as a model for supervision in clinical practice incorporates valuable health-promoting aspects, as the students felt safe, supported, increased self-confidence, and participation. The interaction between peers helped them grow as human beings, and the mutual support the peers felt was a vital health-promoting aspect that limited the impact of the described health-impeding aspects, which included sometimes finding peer-learning trying, stressful and irritating.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34388617
pii: S1471-5953(21)00205-5
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103169
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103169

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

E Ädel (E)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden. Electronic address: ehh@hig.se.

A Löfmark (A)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden. Electronic address: anna.lofmark@hig.se.

Y Pålsson (Y)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: ylapan@hig.se.

G Mårtensson (G)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: gunilla.martensson@hig.se.

M Engström (M)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden; Nursing Department, Medicine and Health College, Lishui University, China. Electronic address: maria.engstrom@hig.se.

M Lindberg (M)

Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, 801 88 Gävle, Sweden. Electronic address: maria.lindberg@hig.se.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH