Ultrasound-assisted foreign body extraction (U-SAFE): Review of technique and technical pearls.


Journal

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 03 05 2021
accepted: 03 08 2021
pubmed: 17 8 2021
medline: 6 4 2022
entrez: 16 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Soft tissue foreign bodies are a common presentation to emergency departments and primary care. They have variable presentations and associated morbidity depending on their acuity, location, functional impairment and neurovascular involvement. Traditional removal has utilised blind technique or surgical exploration. Their removal can be difficult secondary to induration, inflammation, granulation and scar tissue. Ultrasonography has emerged as a minimally invasive and inexpensive method of examination and retrieval. This article entails ultrasound-guided foreign body extraction with associated pearls of experience. From March 2017 to August 2020, a fellowship trained interventional radiologist and a fellowship trained musculoskeletal radiologist performed 52 foreign body extractions under ultrasound guidance at a single institution. 52 foreign body extractions occurred over 3-year time period with a 95% success rate. The most common location of foreign body was the finger (62%) and feet/toes (17%). Foreign bodies identified include wood (31%), plant-based material (29%), metal (17%), glass (17%) and synthetic material (6%). Two unsuccessful cases were secondary to delayed presentation with significant foreign body reaction and the 2 Ultrasonography-guided foreign body extraction is a minimally invasive, efficient and targeted technique for foreign body removal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34396705
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13313
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

362-369

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Références

Moses S. Foreign Bodies of the Skin. [online] Fpnotebook.com, 2021. [Accessed 4 May 2021.] Available from URL: https://fpnotebook.com/surgery/Derm/FrgnBdsOfThSkn.htm
Norfolk GA, Gray SF. Intravenous drug users and broken needles-a hidden risk? Addiction 2003; 98: 1163-6.
Ebrahimi A, Radmanesh M, Rabiei S, Kavoussi H. Surgical removal of neglected soft tissue foreign bodies by needle-guided technique. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 25: 29-36.
Halaas GW. Management of foreign bodies in the skin. Am Fam Physician 2007; 76: 683-8.
Bray PW, Mahoney JL, Campbell JP. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of foreign bodies in the hand. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20: 661-6.
Park HJ, Lee SM, Lee SY et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous removal of wooden foreign bodies in the extremities with hydro-dissection technique. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16: 1326-31.
Del Cura JL, Aza I, Zabala RM, Sarabia M, Korta I. US-guided localization and removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies. Radiographics 2020; 40: 1188-95.
Callegari L, Leonardi A, Bini A et al. Ultrasound-guided removal of foreign bodies: personal experience. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1273-9.
Rooks VJ, Shiels WE 3rd, Murakami JW. Soft tissue foreign bodies: a training manual for sonographic diagnosis and guided removal. J Clin Ultrasound 2020; 48: 330-6.
Skinner EJ, Morrison CA. Wound Foreign Body Removal. [Updated 2021 Jan 30]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021 Jan. Available from URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554447/
de Boer HL, Houpt P. Rubber glove tourniquet: perhaps not so simple or safe? Eur J Plast Surg 2007; 30: 91-2.
Durrant C, Townley WA, Ramkumar S, Khoo CT. Forgotten digital tourniquet: salvage of an ischaemic finger by application of medicinal leeches. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 462-4.
Lane JC, Mabvuure NT, Hindocha S, Khan W. Current concepts of prophylactic antibiotics in trauma: a review. Open Orthop J 2012; 6: 511-7.
Medeiros I, Saconato H. Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD001738. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001738
Australia Immunisation Handbook, 2021. Tetanus. [online]. [Accessed 4 May 2021.] Available from URL: https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/vaccine-preventable-diseases/tetanus#accordion-para-10261-184583

Auteurs

Roland Z White (RZ)

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Pouria Rezaian (P)

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Benson Radiology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Amaran Parasuramar (A)

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Matthew J Sampson (MJ)

Benson Radiology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH