Intraosseous Regional Prophylactic Antibiotics Decrease the Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary TKA: A Multicenter Study.
Administration, Intravenous
Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
/ methods
Arthritis, Infectious
/ etiology
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Infusions, Intraosseous
Male
Prosthesis-Related Infections
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
received:
17
02
2021
accepted:
08
07
2021
pubmed:
17
8
2021
medline:
30
11
2021
entrez:
16
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent studies have demonstrated that the administration of regional prophylactic antibiotics by intraosseous (IO) injection achieves tissue concentrations around the knee that are 10- to 15-fold higher than intravenous (IV) delivery of prophylactic antibiotics. It is currently unknown whether the use of regional prophylactic antibiotics for primary TKA would result in a lower risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). (1) Is IO injection of prophylactic antibiotics associated with a decreased risk of early (< 12 months) deep PJI compared with traditional IV prophylactic antibiotics? (2) What other patient factors are associated with an increased risk of early PJI after TKA, and do regional prophylactic antibiotics influence these risk factors? (3) Can IO antibiotics be administered to all patients, and what complications occurred from the delivery of IO prophylactic antibiotics? A retrospective comparative study of all primary TKAs (1909 TKAs) over a 5-year period (January 2013 to December 2017) was performed to determine the risk of early PJI. Three primary TKAs did not meet the study inclusion criteria and were excluded from the study, leaving a total of 1906 TKAs (725 IO, 1181 IV) for analysis at a minimum of 12 months after index procedure. Both cohorts exhibited similar ages, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades; however, a greater proportion of patients in the IO cohort were smokers (p = 0.01), while a greater proportion of patients were diabetic in the IV cohort (p = 0.006). The PJI risk between IO and IV delivery techniques was compared while adjusting for patient demographics and medical comorbidities. Complications related to IO delivery-inability to administer via IO technique, compartment syndrome, fat embolism, and red man syndrome with vancomycin use-were recorded. The delivery of regional prophylactic antibiotics by the IO technique resulted in a lower PJI risk than IV prophylactic antibiotics (0.1% [1 of 725] compared with 1.4% [16 of 1181]; relative risk 0.10 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.77]; p = 0.03). BMI (β = -0.17; standard error = 0.08; p = 0.02), diabetes (β = -1.80; standard error = 0.75; p = 0.02), and renal failure (β = -2.37; standard error = 0.84; p = 0.01) were factors associated with of PJI, while smoking, sex, and ASA score were not contributing factors (p > 0.05). Although BMI, diabetes, and renal failure were identified as infection risk factors, the use of IO antibiotics in these patients did not result in a lower PJI risk compared with IV antibiotics (p > 0.05). IO antibiotics were able to be successfully administered to all patients in this cohort, and there were no complications related to the delivery of IO antibiotics. Surgeons should consider administering regional prophylactic antibiotics in primary TKA to reduce the risk of early PJI. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy of regional prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the PJI risk in primary TKA. Level III, therapeutic study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have demonstrated that the administration of regional prophylactic antibiotics by intraosseous (IO) injection achieves tissue concentrations around the knee that are 10- to 15-fold higher than intravenous (IV) delivery of prophylactic antibiotics. It is currently unknown whether the use of regional prophylactic antibiotics for primary TKA would result in a lower risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI).
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
(1) Is IO injection of prophylactic antibiotics associated with a decreased risk of early (< 12 months) deep PJI compared with traditional IV prophylactic antibiotics? (2) What other patient factors are associated with an increased risk of early PJI after TKA, and do regional prophylactic antibiotics influence these risk factors? (3) Can IO antibiotics be administered to all patients, and what complications occurred from the delivery of IO prophylactic antibiotics?
METHODS
A retrospective comparative study of all primary TKAs (1909 TKAs) over a 5-year period (January 2013 to December 2017) was performed to determine the risk of early PJI. Three primary TKAs did not meet the study inclusion criteria and were excluded from the study, leaving a total of 1906 TKAs (725 IO, 1181 IV) for analysis at a minimum of 12 months after index procedure. Both cohorts exhibited similar ages, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades; however, a greater proportion of patients in the IO cohort were smokers (p = 0.01), while a greater proportion of patients were diabetic in the IV cohort (p = 0.006). The PJI risk between IO and IV delivery techniques was compared while adjusting for patient demographics and medical comorbidities. Complications related to IO delivery-inability to administer via IO technique, compartment syndrome, fat embolism, and red man syndrome with vancomycin use-were recorded.
RESULTS
The delivery of regional prophylactic antibiotics by the IO technique resulted in a lower PJI risk than IV prophylactic antibiotics (0.1% [1 of 725] compared with 1.4% [16 of 1181]; relative risk 0.10 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.77]; p = 0.03). BMI (β = -0.17; standard error = 0.08; p = 0.02), diabetes (β = -1.80; standard error = 0.75; p = 0.02), and renal failure (β = -2.37; standard error = 0.84; p = 0.01) were factors associated with of PJI, while smoking, sex, and ASA score were not contributing factors (p > 0.05). Although BMI, diabetes, and renal failure were identified as infection risk factors, the use of IO antibiotics in these patients did not result in a lower PJI risk compared with IV antibiotics (p > 0.05). IO antibiotics were able to be successfully administered to all patients in this cohort, and there were no complications related to the delivery of IO antibiotics.
CONCLUSION
Surgeons should consider administering regional prophylactic antibiotics in primary TKA to reduce the risk of early PJI. Future randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy of regional prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the PJI risk in primary TKA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, therapeutic study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34397615
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001919
pii: 00003086-202111000-00030
pmc: PMC8509941
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2504-2512Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Références
AlBuhairan B, Hind D, Hutchinson A. Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 2008;90:915-919.
Alijanipour P, Heller S, Parvizi J. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection: what are the effective strategies? J Knee Surg. 2014;27:251-258.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2019. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2019 . Accessed March 20, 2020.
Bratzler DW, Houck PM; Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1706-1715.
Chin SJ, Moore GA, Zhang M, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ, Young SW. The AAHKS clinical research award: Intraosseous regional prophylaxis provides higher tissue concentrations in high BMI patients in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:S13-S18.
Chui SY, Onishko C, Turner S, Coulthard K, McKinnon R. Incidence of vancomycin‐induced red man syndrome in a women’s and children’s hospital. J Pharm Pract Res. 2007;37:124-126.
de Lalla F, Viola R, Pellizzer G, Lazzarini L, Tramarin A, Fabris P. Regional prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement: an open study. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2000;44:316-319.
Fiallos M, Kissoon N, Abdelmoneim T, et al. Fat embolism with the use of intraosseous infusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Medical Sci. 1997;314:73-79.
Friedman RJ, Friedrich LV, White RL, Kays MB, Brundage DM, Graham J. Antibiotic prophylaxis and tourniquet inflation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:17-23.
Hasan MY, Kissoon N, Khan TM, Saldajeno V, Goldstein J, Murphy SP. Intraosseous infusion and pulmonary fat embolism. Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2001;2:133-138.
Jämsen E, Nevalainen P, Kalliovalkama J, Moilanen T. Preoperative hyperglycemia predicts infected total knee replacement. Eur J Intern Med. 2010;21:196-201.
Kasteren MEE van, Manniën J, Ott A, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Gyssens IC. Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:921-927.
Klasan A, Patel CK, Young SW. Intraosseous regional administration of vancomycin in primary total knee arthroplasty does not increase the risk of vancomycin-associated complications. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:1633-1637.
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:61-5.e1.
Marchant MH, Viens NA, Cook C, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. The impact of glycemic control and diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1621-1629.
Mraovic B, Suh D, Jacovides C, Parvizi J. Perioperative hyperglycemia and postoperative infection after lower limb arthroplasty. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:412-418.
Nickinson RSJ, Board TN, Gambhir AK, Porter ML, Kay PR. The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2010;34:505-510.
Orlowski JP, Julius CJ, Petras RE, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM. The safety of intraosseous infusions: risks of fat and bone marrow emboli to the lungs. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:1062-1067.
Parvizi J, Cavanaugh PK, Diaz-Ledezma C. Periprosthetic knee infection: ten strategies that work. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013;25:155.
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992-2994.
Petitpas F, Guenezan J, Vendeuvre T, Scepi M, Oriot D, Mimoz O. Use of intra-osseous access in adults: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20:102.
Ravi S, Zhu M, Luey C, Young SW. Antibiotic resistance in early periprosthetic joint infection. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:1014-1018.
Rezapoor M, Parvizi J. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:902-907.
Sivagnanam S, Deleu D. Red man syndrome. Crit Care. 2002;7:119.
Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:302-345.
Tyllianakis ME, Karageorgos AC, Marangos MN, Saridis AG, Lambiris EE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison between cefuroxime and two specific antistaphylococcal agents. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1078-1082.
Wyles CC, Hevesi M, Osmon DR, et al. 2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin. Bone Joint J. 2019;101:9-15.
Yamada K, Matsumoto K, Tokimura F, Okazaki H, Tanaka S. Are bone and serum cefazolin concentrations adequate for antimicrobial prophylaxis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3486-3494.
Young SW, Roberts T, Johnson S, Dalton JP, Coleman B, Wiles S. Regional intraosseous administration of prophylactic antibiotics is more effective than systemic administration in a mouse model of TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3573-3584.
Young SW, Zhang M, Freeman JT, Mutu-Grigg J, Pavlou P, Moore GA. The Mark Coventry Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin with low-dose intraosseous regional versus systemic prophylaxis in TKA: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:57-65.
Young SW, Zhang M, Freeman JT, Vince KG, Coleman B. Higher cefazolin concentrations with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:244-249.
Young SW, Zhang M, Moore GA, Pitto RP, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. The John N. Insall Award: Higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin achieved with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in revision TKA: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:66-74.