Glucose control using fast-acting insulin aspart in a real-world setting: A 1-year, two-centre study in people with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring.


Journal

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
ISSN: 1463-1326
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Obes Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883645

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
revised: 29 07 2021
received: 31 05 2021
accepted: 13 08 2021
pubmed: 18 8 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 17 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from traditional mealtime insulins to fast-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) in a "real-world" clinical practice setting in adult people with type 1 diabetes (PWD1) who were using intermittently scanned or real-time continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM or rtCGM, respectively). Data from 438 adult PWD1 (60% men, age 44.6 ± 16.2 years, diabetes duration 21.5 ± 14.0 years, isCGM/rtCGM: 391/47, multiple daily injections/continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: 409/29), who initiated Fiasp from January 2018 to May 2020, were analysed. The primary objective was the evolution of time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary objectives included change in HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), insulin doses, time below range (<70 and <54 mg/dL), and time above range (>180 and >250 mg/dL). TIR improved from 50.3% ± 15.6% to 54.3% ± 15.1% at 6 months (n = 425) and to 55.5% ± 15.2% at 12 months (n = 385) (P < .001), corresponding to 57 min/d at 6 months and 75 min/d at 12 months. Time spent below 54 mg/dL evolved from 3.1% ± 3.3% to 3.1% ± 3.7% and 2.5% ± 3.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively (P = .011). Also, time spent above 180 mg/dL decreased from 42.3% ± 16.7% at start by 4.2% at 6 months and by 4.6% at 12 months (P < .001). The proportion of people reaching TIR more than 70% increased from 11.0% to 14.8% (P = .002), and those spending less than 4% at time less than 70 mg/dL increased from 36.1% to 42.1% (P = .002). After 12 months, HbA1c, insulin doses, and BMI did not change significantly. In a Belgian real-world setting of adult PWD1, switching to Fiasp was associated with a 5% increased TIR after 12 months, corresponding to 75 min/d, in combination with less time spent below and above range.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34402157
doi: 10.1111/dom.14527
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0
Glycated Hemoglobin A 0
Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Insulin 0
Insulin Aspart D933668QVX

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2716-2727

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

DiMeglio LA, Evans-Molina C, Oram RA. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2018;391(10138):2449-2462.
de Ridder F, den Brinker M, de Block C. The road from intermittently scanned glucose monitoring to hybrid closed-loop systems: part A, keys to success: subject profiles, choice of systems, education. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2019;10:2042018819865399.
de Ridder F, den Brinker M, de Block C. The road from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring to hybrid closed-loop systems. Part B: results from randomized controlled trials. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2019;10:2042018819871903.
Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A, et al. Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on metrics of glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(5):1146-1156.
Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.
Nathan DM. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9-16.
Charleer S, de Block C, Nobels F, et al. Sustained impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy: results after the 24-month RESCUE study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(12):3016-3023.
Charleer S, de Block C, van Huffel L, et al. Quality of life and glucose control after 1 year of nationwide reimbursement of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults living with type 1 diabetes (FUTURE): a prospective observational real-world cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(2):389-397.
Charleer S, Mathieu C, Nobels F, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, acute admissions, and quality of life: a real-world study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(3):1224-1232.
Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Laffel LM, Pickup JC. Advances in technology for management of type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1265-1273.
Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1367-1377.
van Beers CA, DeVries JH, Kleijer SJ, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(11):893-902.
Šoupal J, Petruželková L, Grunberger G, et al. Glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the COMISAIR study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(1):37-43.
Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: the GOLD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):379-387.
Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):371-378.
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(8):1593-1603.
Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD, et al. Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(3):400-405.
Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66-72.
Lavens A, Nobels F, de Block C, et al. Effect of an integrated, multidisciplinary nationwide approach to T1D care on metabolic outcomes: an observational real-world study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23:565-576.
International Diabetes Federation Guideline Development Group. Guideline for management of postmeal glucose in diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):256-268.
Home PD. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(9):780-788.
Kildegaard J, Buckley ST, Nielsen RH, et al. Elucidating the mechanism of absorption of fast-acting insulin aspart: the role of niacinamide. Pharm Res. 2019;36(3):49.
Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T, Erichsen L, Haahr H. A pooled analysis of clinical pharmacology trials investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast-acting insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(5):551-559.
Heise T, Zijlstra E, Nosek L, Rikte T, Haahr H. Pharmacological properties of faster-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(2):208-215.
Russell-Jones D, Bode BW, de Block C, et al. Fast-acting insulin aspart improves glycemic control in basal-bolus treatment for type 1 diabetes: results of a 26-week multicenter, active-controlled, treat-to-target, randomized, parallel-group trial (onset 1). Diabetes Care. 2017;40(7):943-950.
Buse JB, Carlson AL, Komatsu M, et al. Fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in the setting of insulin degludec-treated type 1 diabetes: efficacy and safety from a randomized double-blind trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(12):2885-2893.
Klonoff DC, Evans ML, Lane W, et al. A randomized, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in adults with type 1 diabetes (Onset 5). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(4):961-967.
Danne T, Axel Schweitzer M, Keuthage W, et al. Impact of fast-acting insulin aspart on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes using intermittent-scanning continuous glucose monitoring within a real-world setting: the GoBolus study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23(3):203-212.
Dovc K, Battelino T. Time in range centered diabetes care. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2021;30(1):1-10.
Geddes J, Schopman JE, Zammitt NN, Frier BM. Prevalence of impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Med. 2008;25:501-504.
Gold AE, MacLeod KM, Frier BM. Frequency of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type I diabetes with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:697-703.
Baru A, Amir S, Ekelund M, Montagnoli R, da Rocha Fernandes JD. A survey of physician experience and treatment satisfaction using fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2020;132(4):320-327.
El Malahi A, van Elsen M, Charleer S, et al. Chronic complications versus glycaemic variability, time in range and HbA1c in people with type 1 diabetes: sub study of the RESCUE-trial. Diabetologia. 2020;63:19.
Ranjan AG, Rosenlund SV, Hansen TW, Rossing P, Andersen S, Nørgaard K. Improved time in range over 1 year is associated with reduced albuminuria in individuals with sensor-augmented insulin pump-treated type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(11):2882-2885.
Picconi F, Parravano M, Ylli D, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the role of glycemic variability. Acta Diabetol. 2017;54(5):489-497.
Sartore G, Chilelli NC, Burlina S, Lapolla A. Association between glucose variability as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50(3):437-442.
Šoupal J, Škrha J Jr, Fajmon M, et al. Glycemic variability is higher in type 1 diabetes patients with microvascular complications irrespective of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(4):198-203.
Zijlstra E, Demissie M, Graungaard T, Heise T, Nosek L, Bode B. Investigation of pump compatibility of fast-acting insulin aspart in subjects with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12:145-151.
Freckmann G, Pleus S, Schauer S, et al. Choice of continuous glucose monitoring systems may affect metrics: clinically relevant differences in times in ranges [published online ahead of print, January 28, 2021]. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1347-2550
Visser MM, Charleer S, Fieuws S, et al. A randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2021;397(10291):2275-2283.

Auteurs

Lisa Billion (L)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Sara Charleer (S)

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Laurens Verbraeken (L)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Mira Sterckx (M)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Kato Vangelabbeek (K)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Nathalie De Block (N)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Charlien Janssen (C)

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Kristof Van Dessel (K)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Eveline Dirinck (E)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Frida Peiffer (F)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Nancy Bolsens (N)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Chantal Mathieu (C)

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Pieter Gillard (P)

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Christophe De Block (C)

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH