The performance costs of interruption during visual search are determined by the type of search task.
Interruptions
Medical image perception
Visual search
Working memory
Journal
Cognitive research: principles and implications
ISSN: 2365-7464
Titre abrégé: Cogn Res Princ Implic
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 08 2021
20 08 2021
Historique:
received:
29
10
2020
accepted:
05
08
2021
entrez:
20
8
2021
pubmed:
21
8
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prior research has shown that interruptions lead to a variety of performance costs. However, these costs are heterogenous and poorly understood. Under some circumstances, interruptions lead to large decreases in accuracy on the primary task, whereas in others task duration increases, but task accuracy is unaffected. Presently, the underlying cause of these costs is unclear. The Memory for Goals model suggests that interruptions interfere with the ability to represent the current goal of the primary task. Here, we test the idea that working memory (WM) may play a critical role in representing the current goal and thus may underlie the observed costs associated with interruption. In two experiments, we utilized laboratory-based visual search tasks, which differed in their WM demands, in order to assess how this difference influenced the observed interruption costs. Interruptions led to more severe performance costs when the target of the search changed on each trial. When the search target was consistent across trials, the cost of interruption was greatly reduced. This suggests that the WM demands associated with the primary task play an important role in determining the performance costs of interruption. Our findings suggest that it is important for research to consider the cognitive processes a task engages in order to predict the nature of the adverse effects of interruption in applied settings such as radiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34414487
doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00322-0
pii: 10.1186/s41235-021-00322-0
pmc: PMC8377126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
58Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203
pubmed: 30734206
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):269-74
pubmed: 15260192
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):128-49
pubmed: 25214306
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
pubmed: 7605061
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Jun;169(1-4):24-31
pubmed: 26656078
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):314-28
pubmed: 19102615
Psychol Sci. 2005 Sep;16(9):684-8
pubmed: 16137253
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90
pubmed: 20421552
Acad Radiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1623-8
pubmed: 25281360
J Vis. 2009 Oct 06;9(11):8.1-13
pubmed: 20053071
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):299-313
pubmed: 19102614
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Nov 15;12:460
pubmed: 30519166
Psychol Rev. 2005 Apr;112(2):291-328
pubmed: 15783288
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):124-31
pubmed: 22006527
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jun;11(6):589-93
pubmed: 24775910
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):357-371
pubmed: 29943810
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14325-9
pubmed: 18787113
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):1904-14
pubmed: 19459137
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9315-22
pubmed: 21697381
Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
pubmed: 2247540
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):215-26
pubmed: 23294345
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):361-72
pubmed: 23973792
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):1086-1102
pubmed: 29620379
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 1:i118-24
pubmed: 17725994
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):790-8
pubmed: 27056975
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):77
pubmed: 21227076
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
pubmed: 2756067
Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):212-5
pubmed: 21193780
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):12
pubmed: 28275705
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Jun;15(2):125-39
pubmed: 19586251
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):275-81
pubmed: 15260193
J Vis. 2013 Feb 25;13(3):
pubmed: 23444390
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Dec;23(4):369-385
pubmed: 28541075
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1480-8
pubmed: 26882286