Plasma phosphorylated tau 217 and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a retrospective diagnostic performance study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease
/ blood
Amyloid beta-Peptides
/ metabolism
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cognitive Dysfunction
/ blood
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
/ blood
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphorylation
/ physiology
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
tau Proteins
/ blood
Journal
The Lancet. Neurology
ISSN: 1474-4465
Titre abrégé: Lancet Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
09
12
2020
revised:
02
06
2021
accepted:
29
06
2021
pubmed:
22
8
2021
medline:
3
9
2021
entrez:
21
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) are associated with Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. We compared the diagnostic value of both biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease syndromes, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) syndromes. In this retrospective multicohort diagnostic performance study, we analysed plasma samples, obtained from patients aged 18-99 years old who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (Alzheimer's disease dementia, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, or posterior cortical atrophy), FTLD syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia), or mild cognitive impairment; the participants were from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco, CA, USA, and the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium (ARTFL; 17 sites in the USA and two in Canada). Participants from both cohorts were carefully characterised, including assessments of CSF p-tau181, amyloid-PET or tau-PET (or both), and clinical and cognitive evaluations. Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 were measured using electrochemiluminescence-based assays, which differed only in the biotinylated antibody epitope specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of both plasma markers using clinical diagnosis, neuropathological findings, and amyloid-PET and tau-PET measures as gold standards. Difference between two area under the curve (AUC) analyses were tested with the Delong test. Data were collected from 593 participants (443 from UCSF and 150 from ARTFL, mean age 64 years [SD 13], 294 [50%] women) between July 1 and Nov 30, 2020. Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 were correlated (r=0·90, p<0·0001). Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 concentrations were increased in people with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75, mean age 65 years [SD 10]) relative to cognitively unimpaired controls (n=118, mean age 61 years [SD 18]; AUC=0·98 [95% CI 0·95-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·97 [0·94-0·99] for p-tau181; p Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 had excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes from other neurodegenerative disorders. There was some evidence in favour of p-tau217 compared with p-tau181 for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease syndromes versus FTLD syndromes, as an indication of amyloid-PET-positivity, and for stronger correlations with tau-PET signal. Pending replication in independent, diverse, and older cohorts, plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 could be useful screening tools to identify individuals with underlying amyloid and Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. US National Institutes of Health, State of California Department of Health Services, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Michael J Fox foundation, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, Alzheimer's Association.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) are associated with Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. We compared the diagnostic value of both biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease syndromes, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) syndromes.
METHODS
In this retrospective multicohort diagnostic performance study, we analysed plasma samples, obtained from patients aged 18-99 years old who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (Alzheimer's disease dementia, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, or posterior cortical atrophy), FTLD syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia), or mild cognitive impairment; the participants were from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco, CA, USA, and the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium (ARTFL; 17 sites in the USA and two in Canada). Participants from both cohorts were carefully characterised, including assessments of CSF p-tau181, amyloid-PET or tau-PET (or both), and clinical and cognitive evaluations. Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 were measured using electrochemiluminescence-based assays, which differed only in the biotinylated antibody epitope specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of both plasma markers using clinical diagnosis, neuropathological findings, and amyloid-PET and tau-PET measures as gold standards. Difference between two area under the curve (AUC) analyses were tested with the Delong test.
FINDINGS
Data were collected from 593 participants (443 from UCSF and 150 from ARTFL, mean age 64 years [SD 13], 294 [50%] women) between July 1 and Nov 30, 2020. Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 were correlated (r=0·90, p<0·0001). Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 concentrations were increased in people with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75, mean age 65 years [SD 10]) relative to cognitively unimpaired controls (n=118, mean age 61 years [SD 18]; AUC=0·98 [95% CI 0·95-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·97 [0·94-0·99] for p-tau181; p
INTERPRETATION
Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 had excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes from other neurodegenerative disorders. There was some evidence in favour of p-tau217 compared with p-tau181 for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease syndromes versus FTLD syndromes, as an indication of amyloid-PET-positivity, and for stronger correlations with tau-PET signal. Pending replication in independent, diverse, and older cohorts, plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 could be useful screening tools to identify individuals with underlying amyloid and Alzheimer's disease tau pathology.
FUNDING
US National Institutes of Health, State of California Department of Health Services, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Michael J Fox foundation, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, Alzheimer's Association.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34418401
pii: S1474-4422(21)00214-3
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00214-3
pmc: PMC8711249
mid: NIHMS1760878
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Biomarkers
0
MAPT protein, human
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
739-752Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG023501
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : L30 AG069301
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG045333
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U24 AG021886
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG016574
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K24 AG053435
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG038791
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG063911
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG062422
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG019724
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG045390
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U54 NS092089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG045611
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23 AG073514
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K99 AG065501
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23 AG059888
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests JLD and NKP are employees of Eli Lilly and Company, which is exploring commercial development opportunities for p-tau assays. JLD is listed as an inventor on a patent related to reagents used in the p-tau assays. HZ has served at scientific advisory boards for Denali, Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Pinteon Therapeutics, and CogRx, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Fujirebio, Alzecure, and Biogen, and is a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions (BBS) in Gothenburg AB, which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program. OH has acquired research support (for the institution) from AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, GE Healthcare, Pfizer, and Roche. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy or speaker fees from AC Immune, Alzpath, Biogen, Cerveau, and Roche. KB served as a consultant, at advisory boards, or at data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu, Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, and is a cofounder of BBS in Gothenburg AB, outside the submitted work. LTG receives research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly. She has received consulting fees from the Simon Foundation and Cura Sen, and serves as associate editor for Frontiers in Aging Neurosciences, Frontiers in Dementia, and the Journal of Alzheimer Disease. HR has received research support from Biogen Pharmaceuticals, has consulting agreements with Wave Neuroscience and Ionis Pharmaceuticals, and receives research support from US National Institutes of Health (NIH). BFB receives research support from NIH, the Mangurian Foundation, and the Little Family Foundation. He is on the Scientific Advisory Board for the Tau Consortium, and has received grant support for clinical trials from Biogen, Alector, and EIP Pharma. GDR receives research support from NIH, Alzheimer's Association, American College of Radiology, Rainwater Charitable Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, GE Healthcare, and Life Molecular Imaging. He has served as a consultant for Eisai, Merck, Axon Neurosciences, and Johnson & Johnson, and has received speaking honoraria from GE Healthcare. He serves as Associate Editor for JAMA Neurology. JCR is a site principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Eli Lilly and receives support from NIH. ALB receives research support from the NIH, the Rainwater Charitable Foundation, the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, Bluefield Project to Cure Frontotemporal Dementia, the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, and the Alzheimer's Association. He has served as a consultant for Alector, AGTC, Arkuda, Arvinas, AZTherapies, GSK, Oligomerix, Ono, Regeneron, Roche, Samumed, Stealth, Third Rock, Transposon, and Wave, and received research support from Biogen, Eisai, and Regeneron. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9
pubmed: 21514249
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2015 Feb;41(1):24-46
pubmed: 25556536
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):387-397
pubmed: 32123386
Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1121-e1135
pubmed: 30700592
Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14
pubmed: 21325651
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Aug;17(8):1353-1364
pubmed: 33580742
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):379-386
pubmed: 32123385
Ann Neurol. 2009 Aug;66(2):200-8
pubmed: 19743450
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Mar 17;12(1):26
pubmed: 32183883
Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Jul;122(1):111-3
pubmed: 21644037
BMC Neurol. 2015 Aug 20;15:146
pubmed: 26289075
Neurology. 2017 Jul 4;89(1):88-100
pubmed: 28592453
Mov Disord. 2017 Jun;32(6):853-864
pubmed: 28467028
J Exp Med. 2020 Nov 2;217(11):
pubmed: 32725127
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1151-1162
pubmed: 30326496
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21(1):40-3
pubmed: 16254429
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jan;131(1):87-102
pubmed: 26659578
Ann Neurol. 2011 Aug;70(2):327-40
pubmed: 21823158
Brain. 2011 Sep;134(Pt 9):2456-77
pubmed: 21810890
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):772-781
pubmed: 32722745
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1503-1527
pubmed: 31039256
Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Feb;15(2):205-216
pubmed: 30347188
Neurobiol Aging. 2003 Mar-Apr;24(2):197-211
pubmed: 12498954
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 3;11(1):1683
pubmed: 32246036
Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1635-e1646
pubmed: 31597710
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1034-1042
pubmed: 34031605
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jan;16(1):55-65
pubmed: 27979356
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(3):e0121945
pubmed: 25835001
Lancet Neurol. 2020 May;19(5):422-433
pubmed: 32333900
Cell. 2020 Dec 10;183(6):1699-1713.e13
pubmed: 33188775
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jan;123(1):1-11
pubmed: 22101365
Brain. 2020 Dec 5;143(11):3234-3241
pubmed: 33068398
Neurology. 2020 Dec 1;95(22):e3026-e3035
pubmed: 32973122
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):398-407
pubmed: 32161412