Comparison of whole breast dosimetry techniques - From 3DCRT to VMAT and the impact on heart and surrounding tissues.
Breast < clinical site
planning < radiation therapy
technique < general
Journal
Journal of medical radiation sciences
ISSN: 2051-3909
Titre abrégé: J Med Radiat Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620352
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
revised:
07
07
2021
received:
10
02
2021
accepted:
07
08
2021
pubmed:
26
8
2021
medline:
5
3
2022
entrez:
25
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Various techniques for whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) have been reported to increase dose to contralateral tissues. Heart dose is of critical importance as there is no apparent dose threshold below which there is no risk. The aim of this study was to compare planning techniques for WBRT that achieves the best target dosimetry and lowest organ at risk (OAR) dose. Thirty early-stage whole breast patient datasets, 15 each left- and right-sided cases, were retrospectively selected. Five techniques were generated for each data set: three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy (HYI), hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) - (HYV), reduced arc VMAT - bowtie (BT), and BT flattening filter free (FFF) - (BTFFF). Plan goals and OARs were evaluated and compared between techniques. BT had the highest median conformity index (CI) values (0.82, IQR: 0.80-0.85 left and 0.83, IQR 0.80-0.86 right). BT recorded lower mean heart doses (median value 1.19Gy, IQR: 0.90-1.55), and BTFFF recorded lower heart V2.5 Overall BT and BTFFF techniques produced lower OAR doses and equivalent PTV coverage for WBRT. BT and BTFFF techniques increased contralateral lung and breast doses; however, these were within prescribed tolerances and comparable to results published in the literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34432386
doi: 10.1002/jmrs.541
pmc: PMC8892436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
98-107Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.
Références
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017 Sep;40(3):729-736
pubmed: 28523470
Springerplus. 2016 May 28;5(1):688
pubmed: 27350922
Med Dosim. 2012 Autumn;37(3):287-92
pubmed: 22284640
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1073-1081
pubmed: 32585334
Radiol Med. 2019 Jun;124(6):546-554
pubmed: 30701385
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Jul-Sep;14(5):1005-1009
pubmed: 30197339
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jan;122(1):72-78
pubmed: 27866849
Phys Med. 2018 Jan;45:82-87
pubmed: 29472095
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Dec;20(12):36-44
pubmed: 31680445
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 18;14(1):109
pubmed: 31215458
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):394-400
pubmed: 21036489
Med Dosim. 2012 Summer;37(2):131-7
pubmed: 21945169
Acta Oncol. 2018 Oct;57(10):1325-1330
pubmed: 30264635
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190317
pubmed: 31295011
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):83-8
pubmed: 12694826
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep 2;14(1):156
pubmed: 31477165
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Oct 26;19(10):2929-2934
pubmed: 30362326
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):684-693
pubmed: 30125454
Eur J Breast Health. 2019 Apr 01;15(2):85-89
pubmed: 31001609
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98
pubmed: 23484825