COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at a tertiary care hospital.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ diagnosis
Delayed Diagnosis
Female
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Pandemics
Patients
/ psychology
Retrospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
/ isolation & purification
Survival Rate
Telemedicine
Tertiary Care Centers
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
02
2021
accepted:
10
08
2021
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
9
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represent a vulnerable population potentially negatively affected by COVID-19-associated reallocation of healthcare resources. Here, we report the impact of COVID-19 on the management of HCC patients in a large tertiary care hospital. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of HCC patients who presented at the Vienna General Hospital, between 01/DEC/2019 and 30/JUN/2020. We compared patient care before (period 1) and after (period 2) implementation of COVID-19-associated healthcare restrictions on 16/MAR/2020. Of 126 patients, majority was male (n = 104, 83%) with a mean age of 66±11 years. Half of patients (n = 57, 45%) had impaired liver function (Child-Pugh stage B/C) and 91 (72%) had intermediate-advanced stage HCC (BCLC B-D). New treatment, was initiated in 68 (54%) patients. Number of new HCC diagnoses did not differ between the two periods (n = 14 vs. 14). While personal visits were reduced, an increase in teleconsultation was observed (period 2). Number of patients with visit delays (n = 31 (30%) vs. n = 10 (10%); p = 0.001) and imaging delays (n = 25 (25%) vs. n = 7 (7%); p = 0.001) was higher in period 2. Accordingly, a reduced number of patients was discussed in interdisciplinary tumor boards (lowest number in April (n = 24), compared to a median number of 57 patients during period 1). Median number of elective/non-elective admissions was not different between the periods. One patient contracted COVID-19 with lethal outcome. Changes in patient care included reduced personal contacts but increased telephone visits, and delays in diagnostic procedures. The effects on long-term outcome need to be determined.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represent a vulnerable population potentially negatively affected by COVID-19-associated reallocation of healthcare resources. Here, we report the impact of COVID-19 on the management of HCC patients in a large tertiary care hospital.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of HCC patients who presented at the Vienna General Hospital, between 01/DEC/2019 and 30/JUN/2020. We compared patient care before (period 1) and after (period 2) implementation of COVID-19-associated healthcare restrictions on 16/MAR/2020.
RESULTS
Of 126 patients, majority was male (n = 104, 83%) with a mean age of 66±11 years. Half of patients (n = 57, 45%) had impaired liver function (Child-Pugh stage B/C) and 91 (72%) had intermediate-advanced stage HCC (BCLC B-D). New treatment, was initiated in 68 (54%) patients. Number of new HCC diagnoses did not differ between the two periods (n = 14 vs. 14). While personal visits were reduced, an increase in teleconsultation was observed (period 2). Number of patients with visit delays (n = 31 (30%) vs. n = 10 (10%); p = 0.001) and imaging delays (n = 25 (25%) vs. n = 7 (7%); p = 0.001) was higher in period 2. Accordingly, a reduced number of patients was discussed in interdisciplinary tumor boards (lowest number in April (n = 24), compared to a median number of 57 patients during period 1). Median number of elective/non-elective admissions was not different between the periods. One patient contracted COVID-19 with lethal outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
Changes in patient care included reduced personal contacts but increased telephone visits, and delays in diagnostic procedures. The effects on long-term outcome need to be determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34437610
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256544
pii: PONE-D-21-05369
pmc: PMC8389415
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0256544Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
K.P. has nothing to declare; B.S. received travel support from Gilead, Ipsen and AbbVie; L.H. has nothing to declare; L.B. has nothing to declare; T.M. has nothing to declare; M.M. served as a speaker and/or consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Collective Acumen, Gilead, and W. L. Gore & Associates and received travel support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Gilead; T.R. received travel support from Gilead, Roche, MSD, and Gore; grant support from Gilead, Abbvie, Philips, Boehringer Ingelheim, Phenex Pharmaceuticals, and Gore, and served as a consultant for MSD, Gilead, Abbvie, and Boehringer Ingelheim; C.M. has nothing to declare; M.T. received grant support from Albireo, Cymabay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Takeda, honoraria for consulting from BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Falk, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Regulus and Shire, speaker fees from BMS, Falk, Gilead, Intercept and MSD, as well as travel support from Abbvie, Falk, Gilead and Intercept; M.P. is an investigator for Bayer, BMS, Lilly, and Roche; he received speaker honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, and MSD; he is a consultant for Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Eisai, Lilly, MSD, and Roche; he received travel support from Bayer and BMS. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jun;10(6):783-791
pubmed: 32345594
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1919-1926
pubmed: 32473682
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059
pubmed: 32320003
Lancet. 2020 Jun 20;395(10241):1907-1918
pubmed: 32473681
Hepatology. 2020 Jul;72(1):287-304
pubmed: 32298473
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jul;10(7):935-941
pubmed: 32357994
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679-1681
pubmed: 32160451
JHEP Rep. 2021 Feb;3(1):100199
pubmed: 33163949
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1084-1085
pubmed: 32330540
Obes Facts. 2008;1(2):106-16
pubmed: 20054170
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;18(1):1-2
pubmed: 33060841
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 2;6(2):e18810
pubmed: 32238336
Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):571-573
pubmed: 32275485
ESMO Open. 2016 Mar 17;1(2):e000042
pubmed: 27843598
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 20;38(30):3547-3554
pubmed: 32795227
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;19(7):1469-1479.e19
pubmed: 32950749
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1108-1110
pubmed: 32211820
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):893-903
pubmed: 32479790
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;17(9):523-525
pubmed: 32528138
Dig Dis. 2014;32(6):664-9
pubmed: 25376282
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 May 8;22(5):53
pubmed: 32385672
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1627-1633
pubmed: 33184937
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236
pubmed: 29628281
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):335-337
pubmed: 32066541
JHEP Rep. 2020 Oct;2(5):100169
pubmed: 32835190
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 27;69(12):343-346
pubmed: 32214079
Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1088-1089
pubmed: 32330541