Same Day Discharge Versus Overnight Observation Protocols - Similar Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Surgery.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 02 07 2021
revised: 03 08 2021
accepted: 11 08 2021
pubmed: 27 8 2021
medline: 25 2 2022
entrez: 26 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To analyze our institutional experience transitioning from overnight observation (OBS) to same day surgery (SDS) for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) procedures. Prior research has questioned the need for OBS following AUS surgery. We retrospectively reviewed AUS surgeries performed by a single surgeon at our tertiary academic medical center between 08/2013 and 01/2020. Patients were grouped based on discharge status: OBS vs SDS. Cost savings associated with SDS were estimated using room and bed charges from a contemporary group of AUS patients. We identified 525 AUS cases that met inclusion criteria. Men in the SDS group (n = 318) were more likely to have undergone a virgin AUS insertion and were slightly younger and healthier. Men in the OBS group (n = 207) were more likely to suffer an immediate postoperative complication (1% vs 0%, P < .01) and to be readmitted within 90 days of surgery (15% vs 5%, P < .01). The groups did not vary with respect to multiple other perioperative outcomes measures. Among patients who underwent AUS surgery between 09/2017 and 08/2020, those with OBS status (n = 39) had mean additional room and bed charges of $ 745 ± 302 vs none for SDS patients (n = 183). SDS for AUS insertion is safe, effective, and associated with significant cost savings. Routine overnight observation after AUS insertion appears to be unnecessary.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34437897
pii: S0090-4295(21)00795-0
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.016
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

206-210

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Benjamin M Dropkin (BM)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Sarah C Sanders (SC)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Mehraban Kavoussi (M)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Aziz Shaaban (A)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Gregory A Joice (GA)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Steven J Hudak (SJ)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Yair Lotan (Y)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Allen F Morey (AF)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: Allen.Morey@utsouthwestern.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH