The risks and benefits of using social media to engage consumers in service design and quality improvement in Australian public hospitals: findings from an interview study of key stakeholders.
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Aug 2021
26 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
28
04
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
1
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Engaging consumers - patients, families, carers and community members who are current or potential service users - in the planning, design, delivery, and improvement of health services is a requirement of public hospital accreditation in Australia. There is evidence of social media being used for consumer engagement in hospitals internationally, but in Australia this use is uncommon and stakeholders' experiences have not been investigated. The aim of the study was to explore the experiences and beliefs of key Australian public hospital stakeholders around using social media as a consumer engagement tool. This article focuses on the study findings relating to methods, risks, and benefits of social media use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Australian public hospital stakeholders in consumer representative, consumer engagement/patient experience, communications or quality improvement roles. Qualitative data were analysed using a deductive content analysis method. An advisory committee of consumer and service provider stakeholders provided input into the design and conduct of this study. Twenty-six Australian public hospital service providers and consumers were interviewed. Participants described social media being used to: recruit consumers for service design and quality improvement activities; as an online space to conduct consultations or co-design; and, to gather feedback and patient experience data. The risks and benefits discussed by interview participants were grouped into five themes: 1) overcoming barriers to engagement, 2) consumer-initiated engagement; 3) breadth vs depth of engagement, 4) organisational transparency vs control and 5) users causing harm. Social media can be used to facilitate consumer engagement in hospital service design and quality improvement. However, social media alone is unlikely to solve broader issues commonly experienced within health consumer engagement activities, such as tokenistic engagement methods, and lack of clear processes for integrating consumer and patient feedback into quality improvement activities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Engaging consumers - patients, families, carers and community members who are current or potential service users - in the planning, design, delivery, and improvement of health services is a requirement of public hospital accreditation in Australia. There is evidence of social media being used for consumer engagement in hospitals internationally, but in Australia this use is uncommon and stakeholders' experiences have not been investigated. The aim of the study was to explore the experiences and beliefs of key Australian public hospital stakeholders around using social media as a consumer engagement tool. This article focuses on the study findings relating to methods, risks, and benefits of social media use.
METHODS
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Australian public hospital stakeholders in consumer representative, consumer engagement/patient experience, communications or quality improvement roles. Qualitative data were analysed using a deductive content analysis method. An advisory committee of consumer and service provider stakeholders provided input into the design and conduct of this study.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-six Australian public hospital service providers and consumers were interviewed. Participants described social media being used to: recruit consumers for service design and quality improvement activities; as an online space to conduct consultations or co-design; and, to gather feedback and patient experience data. The risks and benefits discussed by interview participants were grouped into five themes: 1) overcoming barriers to engagement, 2) consumer-initiated engagement; 3) breadth vs depth of engagement, 4) organisational transparency vs control and 5) users causing harm.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Social media can be used to facilitate consumer engagement in hospital service design and quality improvement. However, social media alone is unlikely to solve broader issues commonly experienced within health consumer engagement activities, such as tokenistic engagement methods, and lack of clear processes for integrating consumer and patient feedback into quality improvement activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34445972
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06927-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06927-x
pmc: PMC8393819
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
876Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:244-8
pubmed: 23388291
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:366-373
pubmed: 31132544
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):317-326
pubmed: 31016863
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32
pubmed: 26993640
Digit Health. 2021 Feb 24;7:2055207621996870
pubmed: 33717499
Qual Manag Health Care. 1996 Winter;4(2):55-67
pubmed: 10154537
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 10;19(10):e320
pubmed: 29017993
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2017;30(2):71-83
pubmed: 29083295
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):373-382
pubmed: 28230545
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 25;15:81
pubmed: 27225519
Reprod Health Matters. 2013 May;21(41):57-68
pubmed: 23684188
Public Health Rep. 2017 Mar/Apr;132(2):140-148
pubmed: 28135430
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Jul;16(7):504
pubmed: 24947833
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):29-36
pubmed: 29681040
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1982-94
pubmed: 25366992
Patient. 2018 Apr;11(2):155-166
pubmed: 29030831
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004563
pubmed: 16856050
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Nov;25(8):632-639
pubmed: 28736934
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):379-386
pubmed: 28960630
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520
pubmed: 25083128
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282
pubmed: 29204457
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1335-50
pubmed: 26159633
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):106-15
pubmed: 24019507
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
pubmed: 23615206
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):817-27
pubmed: 26113295
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(5):
pubmed: 29695038
Oman Med J. 2014 Jan;29(1):3-7
pubmed: 24501659
Nurse Res. 2006;13(3):7-21
pubmed: 16594366
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 11;16(2):e13
pubmed: 24518354
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:19-27
pubmed: 28189820
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):389-91
pubmed: 26658773
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1661-1674
pubmed: 30192686
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 26;16:442
pubmed: 27562728
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 10;18(1):628
pubmed: 30097008