Efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine for analgesia after lower joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis.


Journal

Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
accepted: 30 07 2021
pubmed: 28 8 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 27 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Widespread adoption of intrathecal morphine into clinical practice is hampered by concerns about its potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis with the primary objective of determining the efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine. Our secondary objective was to determine the dose associated with greatest efficacy and safety. We also assessed the impact of intrathecal morphine on respiratory depression. We systematically searched the literature for trials comparing intrathecal morphine with a control group in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. Our primary efficacy outcome was rest pain score (0-10) at 8-12 hours; our primary safety outcome was the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. Twenty-nine trials including 1814 patients were identified. Rest pain score at 8-12 hours was significantly reduced in the intrathecal morphine group, with a mean difference (95%CI) of -1.7 (-2.0 to -1.3), p < 0.0001 (19 trials; 1420 patients; high-quality evidence), without sub-group differences between doses (p = 0.35). Intrathecal morphine increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 1.4 (1.3-1.6), p < 0.0001 (24 trials; 1603 patients; high-quality evidence). However, a sub-group analysis by dose revealed that rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours were similar between groups at a dose of 100 µg, while the risk significantly increased with larger doses (p value for sub-group difference = 0.02). Patients receiving intrathecal morphine were no more likely to have respiratory depression, the risk ratio (95%CI) being 0.9 (0.5-1.7), p = 0.78 (16 trials; 1173 patients; high-quality evidence). In conclusion, there is good evidence that intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia after lower limb arthroplasty, without an increased risk of respiratory depression, but at the expense of an increased rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A dose of 100 µg is a 'ceiling' dose for analgesia and a threshold dose for increased rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34448492
doi: 10.1111/anae.15569
pmc: PMC9292760
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Morphine 76I7G6D29C

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1648-1658

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Références

J Pain Res. 2017 May 09;10:1059-1069
pubmed: 28533694
J Knee Surg. 2019 Sep;32(9):934-939
pubmed: 30372781
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):589-96
pubmed: 20707248
Anaesthesia. 2019 May;74(5):651-662
pubmed: 30802933
Anesthesiology. 2014 Jun;120(6):1505-12
pubmed: 24845921
Anesthesiology. 1984 Sep;61(3):276-310
pubmed: 6206753
Anesth Analg. 2003 Apr;96(4):1083-1088
pubmed: 12651665
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429
pubmed: 28186223
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e54-e61
pubmed: 31903577
Anesthesiology. 2016 Mar;124(3):535-52
pubmed: 26655725
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Jul;57(1):69-77
pubmed: 30625833
Anaesthesist. 2008 Apr;57(4):347-54
pubmed: 18414916
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Anaesthesia. 2021 Mar;76(3):393-403
pubmed: 32621529
Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1709-1715
pubmed: 14633547
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 16;16(1):38
pubmed: 27422406
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jul;62(7):702-7
pubmed: 17567346
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):811-817
pubmed: 32900508
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(7):1473-1484
pubmed: 33690856
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):94-105
pubmed: 27339124
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Mar;73(3):424-8
pubmed: 1705938
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):1000-1005
pubmed: 32900985
Anesth Analg. 1988 Nov;67(11):1082-8
pubmed: 3189898
Br J Anaesth. 1993 Nov;71(5):661-4
pubmed: 8251275
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Aug;63:109745
pubmed: 32113076
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):643-51
pubmed: 19462494
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
J Anesth. 2009;23(4):504-7
pubmed: 19921358
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Aug;26(8):683-8
pubmed: 19307970
Anaesthesist. 2003 Mar;52(3):204-9
pubmed: 12666001
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):154-64
pubmed: 27089000
Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):793-800
pubmed: 30950522
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Sep;23(5):801-806
pubmed: 30213365
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Aug;85(2):233-7
pubmed: 10992830
Anaesthesia. 2018 Apr;73(4):480-489
pubmed: 29226971
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):62-66
pubmed: 33103526
Anesthesiology. 1979 Feb;50(2):149-51
pubmed: 373503
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84
pubmed: 26030634
Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):411-448
pubmed: 32467512
Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1368-70
pubmed: 24257387
Anesth Analg. 1995 Jan;80(1):86-91
pubmed: 7802307
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jul;43(4):454-60
pubmed: 26099756
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):27
pubmed: 29486720
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):695-705
pubmed: 22404241
Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):532-534
pubmed: 28213890
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Feb;97(2):195-202
pubmed: 24765899
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;48(6):551-6
pubmed: 11444449
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Nov;73(5):628-33
pubmed: 7826791
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999 Dec;46(10):433-7
pubmed: 10670264
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):154-160
pubmed: 29315129
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;45(8):735-40
pubmed: 9793662
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1384-93
pubmed: 23928707
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):166-173
pubmed: 29219935
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):503-8
pubmed: 24249988
Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1452-1457
pubmed: 14570664
Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76(1):101-117
pubmed: 32385856

Auteurs

E Gonvers (E)

Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

K El-Boghdadly (K)

Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London, London, UK.

S Grape (S)

Department of Anaesthesia, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland.

E Albrecht (E)

Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lausanne and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH