What is the current practice for managing patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia in vascular surgery services? A survey of UK vascular surgeons.
Access and evaluation
Critical pathways
Health care quality
Peripheral arterial disease
Time-to-treatment
Vascular surgical procedures
Journal
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
10
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland (VSGBI) Peripheral Arterial Disease Quality Improvement Framework (PAD QIF) stipulates targets for managing patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI); however, it is unknown whether these are achievable. This survey aims to evaluate contemporary practice for managing CLTI in the UK. A questionnaire was developed in conjunction with the VSGBI to survey the management of CLTI and canvass opinions on the PAD QIF. The survey was distributed to all consultant members of the VSGBI and through a targeted social media campaign. Forty-seven consultant vascular surgeons based at 36 arterial centres across the UK responded (response rate from arterial centres = 46%). Only 14.3% of centres provided outpatient consultation within the target of seven days from referral, with only one centre providing revascularisation within the target of seven days from consultation. For inpatient management, 31.6% provided surgical and 23.8% endovascular revascularisation within the target of three days from assessment. While 60% of participants believe the PAD QIF's 5-day 'admitted care' pathway is achievable, only 28.6% thought the 14-day 'non-admitted care' pathway was feasible. Challenges to meeting these targets include the availability of theatre space and angiography lists, and availability of outpatient appointments for patient assessment. The opinion of UK vascular surgeons indicates that achieving the targets of the PAD QIF represents a major challenge based upon current services. Adapting existing services with a greater focus on providing an 'urgent' model of care may help to potentially overcome these challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34448653
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0075
pmc: PMC10335170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
694-700Références
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Apr 21;:e3326
pubmed: 32314493
J R Soc Med. 2014 Dec;107(12):483-9
pubmed: 25389229
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1396-1400
pubmed: 33405234
Br J Surg. 2020 Aug;107(9):1097-1103
pubmed: 32293715
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Sep 28;23:28-31
pubmed: 29098077
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 09;15:32
pubmed: 25888346
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33
pubmed: 31182334
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1440-1449
pubmed: 32395848
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Jul;102(6):412-417
pubmed: 32306742
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3276
pubmed: 31958217
Diabetologia. 2012 Jul;55(7):1919-25
pubmed: 22398645
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):669-681.e2
pubmed: 31676182
BMJ. 2020 Jun 12;369:m2386
pubmed: 32532710
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;46(4):404-10
pubmed: 23973275