Combining Multiple Assays Improves Detection and Serotyping of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. A Practical Example with Field Samples from East Africa.


Journal

Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
Titre abrégé: Viruses
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101509722

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 08 2021
Historique:
received: 09 07 2021
revised: 29 07 2021
accepted: 06 08 2021
entrez: 28 8 2021
pubmed: 29 8 2021
medline: 28 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Multiple serotypes and topotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) circulate in endemic areas, posing considerable impacts locally. In addition, introductions into new areas are of great concern. Indeed, in recent years, multiple FMDV outbreaks, caused by topotypes that have escaped from their original areas, have been recorded in various parts of the world. In both cases, rapid and accurate diagnosis, including the identification of the serotype and topotype causing the given outbreaks, plays an important role in the implementation of the most effective and appropriate measures to control the spread of the disease. In the present study, we describe the performance of a range of diagnostic and typing tools for FMDV on a panel of vesicular samples collected in northern Tanzania (East Africa, EA) during 2012-2018. Specifically, we tested these samples with a real-time RT-PCR targeting 3D sequence for pan-FMDV detection; an FMDV monoclonal antibody-based antigen (Ag) detection and serotyping ELISA kit; virus isolation (VI) on LFBKαVβ6 cell line; and a panel of four topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs, specifically tailored for circulating strains in EA. The 3D real-time RT-PCR showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity, but it lacked typing capacity. Ag-ELISA detected and typed FMDV in 71% of sample homogenates, while VI combined with Ag-ELISA for typing showed an efficiency of 82%. The panel of topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs identified and typed FMDV in 93% of samples. However, the SAT1 real-time RT-PCR had the highest (20%) failure rate. Briefly, topotype-specific real-time RT-PCRs had the highest serotyping capacity for EA FMDVs, although four assays were required, while the Ag-ELISA, which was less sensitive, was the most user-friendly, hence suitable for any laboratory level. In conclusion, when the four compared tests were used in combination, both the diagnostic and serotyping performances approached 100%.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34452448
pii: v13081583
doi: 10.3390/v13081583
pmc: PMC8412026
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Viral 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/H009302/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

J Virol Methods. 2002 Aug;105(1):67-80
pubmed: 12176143
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Oct;64(5):1569-1578
pubmed: 27484792
Vet Rec. 2012 Jun 23;170(25):637-9
pubmed: 22730497
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Jun 1;220(11):1636-42
pubmed: 12051502
J Virol Methods. 2018 Feb;252:37-41
pubmed: 29113733
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1968;22:201-44
pubmed: 4301615
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):161-73
pubmed: 23958457
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 09;10(2):e0114811
pubmed: 25664876
Vet Res. 2013 Dec 05;44:116
pubmed: 24308718
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Dec;38(12):4604-13
pubmed: 11101603
J Virol Methods. 2016 Nov;237:114-120
pubmed: 27575682
Arch Virol. 2001 Dec;146(12):2421-34
pubmed: 11811689
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Dec;35(3):741-755
pubmed: 28332654
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;2(9):1449-1457
pubmed: 30082738
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012 Dec;59(6):476-81
pubmed: 23025522
J Virol Methods. 2014 Oct;207:146-53
pubmed: 25016065
Vaccine. 2014 Jun 30;32(31):3902-8
pubmed: 24785105
Virus Genes. 2019 Jun;55(3):304-313
pubmed: 30771081
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0135559
pubmed: 26270532
J Comp Pathol. 2003 Jul;129(1):1-36
pubmed: 12859905
Rev Sci Tech. 2011 Apr;30(1):63-85
pubmed: 21809754
Dev Biol Stand. 1976;35:167-74
pubmed: 198283
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2009 May;21(3):321-30
pubmed: 19407083
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Apr;17(2):465-93
pubmed: 15084510
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Nov;67(6):3005-3015
pubmed: 32530134
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Jan;19(1):9-20
pubmed: 17459827
Rev Med Virol. 1997 Jul;7(2):87-96
pubmed: 10398474
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1714-20
pubmed: 23515553

Auteurs

Efrem Alessandro Foglia (EA)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Tiziana Lembo (T)

The Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.

Rudovick Kazwala (R)

The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha 23306, Tanzania.

Divine Ekwem (D)

The Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.

Gabriel Shirima (G)

The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha 23306, Tanzania.

Santina Grazioli (S)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Emiliana Brocchi (E)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Giulia Pezzoni (G)

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), 25124 Brescia, Italy.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH