Digital Workflow for Double Complete Arch Zirconia Prostheses Utilizing a Novel Scan Body.
CAD/CAM
Digital workflow
all on four
complete arch
dental implants
digital dentistry
full arch
intraoral scanner
scan bodies
zirconia prosthesis
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
accepted:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
29
8
2021
medline:
15
1
2022
entrez:
28
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this clinical report is to present a complete digital workflow for the fabrication of complete arch fixed zirconia implant restorations. An intraoral scanner was used to capture the implants' position at the abutment level and also the patient's existing interim prostheses with the double digital scanning technique. A novel scan body and impression pin were utilized throughout the scanning process which allowed for the accurate and reproducible superimposition of the generated Standard Tesselation Language (STL) files. Prosthesis prototypes were digitally designed and fabricated, tried in, and verified intraorally. The definitive zirconia prostheses were then fabricated and delivered to the patient. This technique can be utilized in both arches overcoming the absence of stable intraoral landmarks for superimposition of STL files.
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4-8Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Lee DJ, Saponaro PC: Management of edentulous patients. Dent Clin North Am 2019;63:249-261
Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L: Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:5-8
Felton DA: Complete edentulism and comorbid diseases: an update. J Prosthodont 2016;25:5-20
Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P, Gauthier M: Clinical outcomes of full arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:35-45
Papaspyridakos P, Lal K: Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:659-665
Caramês J, Marques D, Barbosa JM: Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: a prospective study comparing porcelain veneered zirconia frameworks to monolithic zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:68-78
Tischler M, Patch C, Bidra AS: Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: an up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:204-209
Chochlidakis K, Einarsdottir E, Tsigarida A, et al: Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: an up to 5-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:539-546
Bidra AS, Tischler M, Patch C: Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:220-224
Rojas Vizcaya F: Retrospective 2- to 7-year follow-up study of 20 double full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses: measurements and recommendations for optimal design. J Prosthodont 2018;27:501-508
Papaspyridakos P, Chochlidakis K, Kang K, et al: Digital workflow for implant rehabilitation with double full-arch monolithic zirconia prostheses. J Prosthodont 2020;29:460-465
Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, et al: Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:465-472
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, et al: Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont 2020;29:660-678
Albayrak B, Sukotjo K, Wee AG et al: Three-dimensional accuracy of conventional versus digital complete arch implant impressions. J Prosthodont 2021;30:163-170
Gherlone E, Capparé P, Vinci R, et al: Conventional versus digital impressions for “All-on-Four” restorations. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:324-330
Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P, Tsigarida A et al: Digital versus conventional full-arch implant impressions: a prospective study on 16 edentulous maxillae. J Prosthodont 2020;29:281-286
Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Bathija A et al: Complete digital workflow for mandibular full-arch implant rehabilitation in 3 appointments. J Prosthodont 2021;30:548-552
Fang JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al: Digital intraoral scanning technique for edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:733-735
Papaspyridakos P, Chen YW, Gonzalez-Gusmao I, et al: Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabrication for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: a technique. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:189-192
Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, et al. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:287-290
Tartaglia GM, Farronato M, Sforza C, et al: Implant-supported immediately loaded complete arch rehabilitations with mean follow up of 10 years: a prospective clinical study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:951-957
Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al: Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15
Pan Y, Tsoi J, Lam W, et al: Implant framework misfit: a systematic review on assessment methods and clinical complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;23:244-258
Ercoli C, Geminiani A, Feng C, et al: The influence of verification jig on framework fit for non segmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:188-195
Buzayann MM, Yunus NB. Passive fit in screw retained multi-unit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving: a review of the literature. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14:16-23
Jemt T: In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:151-158
Roberts M, Shull F, Schiner B: Maxillary full-arch reconstruction using a sequenced digital workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32:336-356
Schmidt A, Jan-Wilhelm Billig JW, Schlenz MA, et al: The influence of using different types of scan bodies on the transfer accuracy of implant position: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2021;34:254-260