In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 Against Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli and Identification of Novel Probiotic-Derived Bioactive Peptides.


Journal

Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins
ISSN: 1867-1314
Titre abrégé: Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101484100

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2022
Historique:
accepted: 23 08 2021
pubmed: 31 8 2021
medline: 22 11 2022
entrez: 30 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC), an extra-intestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), causes colibacillosis in poultry and is also a potential foodborne zoonotic pathogen. Currently, APEC infections in poultry are controlled by antibiotic medication; however, the emergence of multi-drug-resistant APEC strains and increased restrictions on the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals necessitate the development of new antibiotic alternative therapies. Here, we tested the anti-APEC activity of multiple commensal and probiotic bacteria in an agar-well diffusion assay and identified Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 producing strong zone of inhibition against APEC. In co-culture assay, L. rhamnosus GG and B. lactis Bb12 completely inhibited the APEC growth by 24 h. Further investigation revealed that antibacterial product(s) in the culture supernatants of L. rhamnosus GG and B. lactis Bb12 were responsible for the anti-APEC activity. The analysis of culture supernatants using LC-MS/MS identified multiple novel bioactive peptides (VQAAQAGDTKPIEV, AFDNTDTSLDSTFKSA, VTDTSGKAGTTKISNV, and AESSDTNLVNAKAA) in addition to the production of lactic acid. The oral administration (10

Identifiants

pubmed: 34458959
doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09840-1
pii: 10.1007/s12602-021-09840-1
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Peptides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1012-1028

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Lutful Kabir SM (2010) Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7(1):89–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010089
doi: 10.3390/ijerph7010089 pubmed: 20195435 pmcid: 2819778
Kathayat D, Lokesh D, Ranjit S, Rajashekara G (2021) Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC): an overview of virulence and pathogenesis factors, zoonotic potential, and control strategies. Pathogens 10(4):467. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040467
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10040467 pubmed: 33921518 pmcid: 8069529
Johnson TJ, Wannemuehler Y, Doetkott C, Johnson SJ, Rosenberger SC, Nolan LK (2008) Identification of minimal predictors of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli virulence for use as a rapid diagnostic tool. J Clin Microbiol 46(12):3987–3996. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00816-08
doi: 10.1128/jcm.00816-08 pubmed: 18842938 pmcid: 2593276
Mellata M (2013) Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10(11):916–932. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1533
doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1533 pubmed: 23962019 pmcid: 3865812
Liu CM, Stegger M, Aziz M, Johnson TJ, Waits K, Nordstrom L, Gauld L, Weaver B, Rolland D, Statham S, Horwinski J, Sariya S, Davis GS, Sokurenko E, Keim P, Johnson JR, Price LB (2018) Escherichia coli ST131-H22 as a foodborne uropathogen. MBio 9(4):e00470-e518. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00470-18
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00470-18 pubmed: 30154256 pmcid: 6113624
Osman KM, Kappell AD, Elhadidy M, ElMougy F, El-Ghany WAA, Orabi A, Mubarak AS, Dawoud TM, Hemeg HA, Moussa IMI, Hessain AM, Yousef HMY (2018) Poultry hatcheries as potential reservoirs for antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli: a risk to public health and food safety. Sci Rep 8(1):5859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23962-7
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23962-7 pubmed: 29643424 pmcid: 5895583
Kathayat D, Helmy YA, Deblais L, Rajashekara G (2018) Novel small molecules affecting cell membrane as potential therapeutics for avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci Rep 8(1):15329. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33587-5
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33587-5 pubmed: 30333507 pmcid: 6193035
Dho-Moulin M, Fairbrother JM (1999) Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Vet Res 30(2–3):299–316
pubmed: 10367360
Nhung NT, Chansiripornchai N, Carrique-Mas JJ (2017) Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: a review. Fron Vet Sci 4:126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00126
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00126
Gyles CL (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in selected bacteria from poultry. Anim Health Res Rev 9(2):149–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252308001552
doi: 10.1017/S1466252308001552 pubmed: 19102788
Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Robinson TP, Teillant A, Laxminarayan R (2015) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(18):5649–5654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112 pubmed: 25792457 pmcid: 4426470
Hao H, Cheng G, Iqbal Z, Ai X, Hussain HI, Huang L, Dai M, Wang Y, Liu Z, Yuan Z (2014) Benefits and risks of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals. Front Microbiol 5:288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00288
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00288 pubmed: 24971079 pmcid: 4054498
Fijan S (2014) Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(5):4745–4767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504745
doi: 10.3390/ijerph110504745 pubmed: 24859749 pmcid: 4053917
Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Díaz J, Muñoz-Quezada S, Gómez-Llorente C, Gil A (2012) Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann Nutr Metab 61(2):160–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342079
doi: 10.1159/000342079 pubmed: 23037511
Sánchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Míguez A, Lourenço A, Gueimonde M, Margolles A (2017) Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600240
Servin AL (2004) Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28(4):405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003 pubmed: 15374659
Ciorba MA (2012) A gastroenterologist’s guide to probiotics. Clin Gastroentero Hepatol 10(9):960–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.024
Lievin-Le Moal V, Servin AL (2014) Anti-infective activities of Lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 27(2):167–199. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00080-13
doi: 10.1128/cmr.00080-13 pubmed: 24696432 pmcid: 3993101
Vlasova AN, Kandasamy S, Chattha KS, Rajashekara G, Saif LJ (2016) Comparison of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria effects, immune responses and rotavirus vaccines and infection in different host species. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 172:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.01.003
doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.01.003 pubmed: 26809484 pmcid: 4818210
Carter A, Adams M, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ (2017) Colonisation of poultry by Salmonella Enteritidis S1400 is reduced by combined administration of Lactobacillus salivarius 59 and Enterococcus faecium PXN-33. Vet Microbiol 199:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.029
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.029 pubmed: 28110775
Van Coillie E, Goris J, Cleenwerck I, Grijspeerdt K, Botteldoorn N, Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, Herman L, Heyndrickx M (2007) Identification of lactobacilli isolated from the cloaca and vagina of laying hens and characterization for potential use as probiotics to control Salmonella Enteritidis. J Appl Microbiol 102(4):1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03164.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03164.x pubmed: 17381753
Saint-Cyr MJ, Haddad N, Taminiau B, Poezevara T, Quesne S, Amelot M, Daube G, Chemaly M, Dousset X, Guyard-Nicodeme M (2017) Use of the potential probiotic strain Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51 to control Campylobacter jejuni in broilers. Int J Food Microbiol 247:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.003
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.003 pubmed: 27432696
Wang S, Peng Q, Jia HM, Zeng XF, Zhu JL, Hou CL, Liu XT, Yang FJ, Qiao SY (2017) Prevention of Escherichia coli infection in broiler chickens with Lactobacillus plantarum B1. Poult Sci 96(8):2576–2586. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex061
doi: 10.3382/ps/pex061 pubmed: 28482103
Foltz KL, Ritzi MM, Barrett NW, Evans NP, Collins D, Sriranganathan N, Mahsoub H, Dalloul RA, Sewell J, Persia ME (2017) Efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation in broilers challenged with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium. J Appl Poult Res 26(3):316–324. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfw074
doi: 10.3382/japr/pfw074
Ding S, Wang Y, Yan W, Li A, Jiang H, Fang J (2019) Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum 15–1 and fructooligosaccharides on the response of broilers to pathogenic Escherichia coli O78 challenge. PLoS One 14(6):e0212079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212079
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212079 pubmed: 31194771 pmcid: 6563962
Forkus B, Ritter S, Vlysidis M, Geldart K, Kaznessis YN (2017) Antimicrobial probiotics reduce Salmonella enterica in turkey gastrointestinal tracts. Sci Rep 7:40695. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40695
doi: 10.1038/srep40695 pubmed: 28094807 pmcid: 5240571
Mañes-Lázaro R, Van Diemen PM, Pin C, Mayer MJ, Stevens MP, Narbad A (2017) Administration of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 to chickens affects colonisation by Campylobacter jejuni and the intestinal microbiota. Br Poult Sci 58(4):373–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322
doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322 pubmed: 28318296
Nakphaichit M, Sobanbua S, Siemuang S, Vongsangnak W, Nakayama J, Nitisinprasert S (2019) Protective effect of Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 against Salmonella Enteritidis challenge in chickens. Benef Microbes 10(1):43–54. https://doi.org/10.3920/bm2018.0034
doi: 10.3920/bm2018.0034 pubmed: 30406695
Tabashsum Z, Peng M, Alvarado-Martinez Z, Aditya A, Bhatti J, Romo PB, Young A, Biswas D (2020) Competitive reduction of poultry-borne enteric bacterial pathogens in chicken gut with bioactive Lactobacillus casei. Sci Rep 10(1):16259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73316-5
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73316-5 pubmed: 33004922 pmcid: 7530658
Mangiamele P, Nicholson B, Wannemuehler Y, Seemann T, Logue CM, Li G, Tivendale KA, Nolan LK (2013) Complete genome sequence of the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain APEC O78. Genome Announc 1(2):e0002613. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00026-13
doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00026-13 pubmed: 23516182
Fijan S (2016) Antimicrobial effect of probiotics against common pathogens. In: Rao V, Rao LG (eds) Probiotics and prebiotics in human nutrition and health. InTech, Rijeka, p Ch. 10.  https://doi.org/10.5772/63141
De Keersmaecker SC, Verhoeven TL, Desair J, Marchal K, Vanderleyden J, Nagy I (2006) Strong antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG against Salmonella Typhimurium is due to accumulation of lactic acid. FEMS Microbiol Lett 259(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00250.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00250.x pubmed: 16684107
Fayol-Messaoudi D, Berger CN, Coconnier-Polter M-H, Liévin-Le Moal V, Servin AL (2005) pH-, lactic acid-, and non-lactic acid-dependent activities of probiotic lactobacilli against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):6008–6013. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.10.6008-6013
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6008-6013 pubmed: 16204515 pmcid: 1266002
Xu Y, Zhao Z, Tong W, Ding Y, Liu B, Shi Y, Wang J, Sun S, Liu M, Wang Y, Qi Q, Xian M, Zhao G (2020) An acid-tolerance response system protecting exponentially growing Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 11(1):1496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15350-5
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15350-5 pubmed: 32198415 pmcid: 7083825
Shokryazdan P, Sieo CC, Kalavathy R, Liang JB, Alitheen NB, Faseleh Jahromi M, Ho YW (2014) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with antimicrobial activity against some human pathogenic strains. BioMed Res Int 2014:927268. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/927268
doi: 10.1155/2014/927268 pubmed: 25105147 pmcid: 4106073
Zhang Y, Zhang L, Du M, Yi H, Guo C, Tuo Y, Han X, Li J, Zhang L, Yang L (2011) Antimicrobial activity against Shigella sonnei and probiotic properties of wild lactobacilli from fermented food. Microbiol Res 167(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2011.02.006
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2011.02.006 pubmed: 21466951
Han J, Lin K, Sequeira C, Borchers CH (2015) An isotope-labeled chemical derivatization method for the quantitation of short-chain fatty acids in human feces by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 854:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.11.015
doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.11.015 pubmed: 25479871
Connor RI (2016) Bioactive molecules produced by probiotic bacteria and methods for isolating and using the same. United States trustees of Dartmouth College US20160024149A1
Helmy YA, Kassem II, Kumar A, Rajashekara G (2017) In vitro evaluation of the impact of the probiotic E. coli Nissle (1917) on Campylobacter jejuni’s invasion and intracellular survival in human colonic cells. Front Microbiol 8:1588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01588
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01588
He X, Zeng Q, Puthiyakunnon S, Zeng Z, Yang W, Qiu J, Du L, Boddu S, Wu T, Cai D, Huang S-H, Cao H (2017) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supernatant enhance neonatal resistance to systemic Escherichia coli K1 infection by accelerating development of intestinal defense. Sci Rep 7:43305. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43305
doi: 10.1038/srep43305 pubmed: 28262688 pmcid: 5338013
Zhang L, Zhang L, Xa Z, Zeng X, Zhou L, Cao G, Ag C, Yang C (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 7:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4
doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4 pubmed: 26819705 pmcid: 4728939
Dommels YEM, Kemperman RA, Zebregs YEMP, Draaisma RB, Jol A, Wolvers DAW, Vaughan EE, Albers R (2009) Survival of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the human gastrointestinal tract with daily consumption of a low-fat probiotic spread. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(19):6198–6204. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01054-09
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01054-09 pubmed: 19684171 pmcid: 2753077
Deblais L, Helmy YA, Kathayat D, Huang H-c, Miller SA, Rajashekara G (2018) Novel imidazole and methoxybenzylamine growth inhibitors affecting Salmonella cell envelope integrity and its persistence in chickens. Sci Rep 8(1):13381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31249-0
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31249-0 pubmed: 30190570 pmcid: 6127322
Helmy YA, Kathayat D, Ghanem M, Jung K, Closs G Jr, Deblais L, Srivastava V, El-Gazzar M, Rajashekara G (2020) Identification and characterization of novel small molecule inhibitors to control Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens. Vet Microbiol 247:108799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108799
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108799 pubmed: 32768201
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille MGI, Lee J, Ley R, Liu Y-X, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin BD, McDonald D, McIver LJ, Melnik AV, Metcalf JL, Morgan SC, Morton JT, Naimey AT, Navas-Molina JA, Nothias LF, Orchanian SB, Pearson T, Peoples SL, Petras D, Preuss ML, Pruesse E, Rasmussen LB, Rivers A, Robeson MS, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song SJ, Spear JR, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Torres PJ, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh PJ, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft JJJ, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber KC, Williamson CHD, Willis AD, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Knight R, Caporaso JG (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37(8):852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 pubmed: 31341288 pmcid: 7015180
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13(7):581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 pubmed: 27214047 pmcid: 4927377
Yang G-Y, Yu J, Su J-H, Jiao L-G, Liu X, Zhu Y-H (2017) Oral administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ameliorates Salmonella infantis-induced inflammation in a pig model via activation of the IL-22BP/IL-22/STAT3 pathway. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00323
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00323 pubmed: 28770173 pmcid: 5514694
Splichalova A, Jenistova V, Splichalova Z, Splichal I (2019) Colonization of preterm gnotobiotic piglets with probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and its interference with Salmonella Typhimurium. Clin Exp Immunol 195(3):381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13236
doi: 10.1111/cei.13236 pubmed: 30422309
Liu J, Hu D, Chen Y, Huang H, Zhang H, Zhao J, Gu Z, Chen W (2018) Strain-specific properties of Lactobacillus plantarum for prevention of Salmonella infection. Food Funct 9(7):3673–3682. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fo00365c
doi: 10.1039/c8fo00365c pubmed: 29956713
Yu J, Zhu Y-H, Yang G-Y, Zhang W, Zhou D, Su J-H, Wang J-F (2017) Anti-inflammatory capacity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in monophasic variant Salmonella infected piglets is correlated with impeding NLRP6-mediated host inflammatory responses. Vet Microbiol 210:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.08.008 pubmed: 29103703
Khailova L, Frank DN, Dominguez JA, Wischmeyer PE (2013) Probiotic administration reduces mortality and improves intestinal epithelial homeostasis in experimental sepsis. Anesthesiology 119(1):166–177. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318291c2fc
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318291c2fc pubmed: 23571641
Sewaka M, Trullas C, Chotiko A, Rodkhum C, Chansue N, Boonanuntanasarn S, Pirarat N (2019) Efficacy of synbiotic Jerusalem artichoke and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-supplemented diets on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, immune parameters and protection against Aeromonas veronii in juvenile red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 86:260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.11.026
doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.11.026 pubmed: 30439500
Zhang W, Zhu Y-H, Yang G-Y, Liu X, Xia B, Hu X, Su J-H, Wang J-F (2018) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG affects microbiota and suppresses autophagy in the intestines of pigs ahallenged with Salmonella infantis. Front Microbiol 8:2705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02705
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02705 pubmed: 29403451 pmcid: 5785727
Chen L, Li H, Li J, Chen Y, Yang Y (2019) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG treatment improves intestinal permeability and modulates microbiota dysbiosis in an experimental model of sepsis. Int J Mol Med 43(3):1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2019.4050
doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4050 pubmed: 30628657 pmcid: 6365041
Huang S-H, He L, Zhou Y, Wu C-H, Jong A (2009) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG suppresses meningitic E. coli K1 penetration across human intestinal epithelial cells in vitro and protects neonatal rats against experimental hematogenous meningitis. Int J Microbiol 647862.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/647862
Gao J, Li Y, Wan Y, Hu T, Liu L, Yang S, Gong Z, Zeng Q, Wei Y, Yang W, Zeng Z, He X, Huang S-H, Cao H (2019) A novel postbiotic from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG with a beneficial effect on intestinal barrier function. Front Microbiol 10:477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00477
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00477 pubmed: 30923519 pmcid: 6426789
Lu R, Fasano S, Madayiputhiya N, Morin NP, Nataro J, Fasano A (2009) Isolation, identification, and characterization of small bioactive peptides from Lactobacillus GG conditional media that exert both anti-Gram-negative and Gram-positive bactericidal activity. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181924d1e
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181924d1e pubmed: 19465870
Kathayat D, Closs G Jr, Helmy YA, Lokesh D, Ranjit S, Rajashekara G (2021) Peptides affecting outer membrane lipid asymmetry (MlaA-OmpC/F) system reduce avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) colonization in chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 87(17):e0056721. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00567-21
doi: 10.1128/aem.00567-21 pubmed: 34132592
Claes IJ, Schoofs G, Regulski K, Courtin P, Chapot-Chartier MP, Rolain T, Hols P, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, de Vos WM, Palva A, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC, Lebeer S (2012) Genetic and biochemical characterization of the cell wall hydrolase activity of the major secreted protein of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. PLoS One 7(2):e31588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031588
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031588 pubmed: 22359601 pmcid: 3281093
Zanfardino A, Criscuolo G, Di Luccia B, Pizzo E, Ciavatta ML, Notomista E, Carpentieri A, Pezzella A, Varcamonti M (2017) Identification of a new small bioactive peptide from Lactobacillus gasseri supernatant. Benef Microbes 8(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.3920/bm2016.0098
doi: 10.3920/bm2016.0098 pubmed: 27824276
Mkrtchyan H, Gibbons S, Heidelberger S, Zloh M, Limaki HK (2010) Purification, characterisation and identification of acidocin LCHV, an antimicrobial peptide produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus n.v. Er 317/402 strain Narine. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35(3):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.017
Luz C, Saladino F, Luciano FB, Mañes J, Meca G (2017) In vitro antifungal activity of bioactive peptides produced by Lactobacillus plantarum against Aspergillus parasiticus and Penicillium expansum. LWT 81:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.053
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.053
Diaz Carrasco JM, Casanova NA, Fernández Miyakawa ME (2019) Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: what is the connection? Microorganisms 7(10):374. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100374
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100374 pmcid: 6843312
Chen L, Li H, Chen Y, Yang Y (2020) Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces mortality of septic mice by modulating gut microbiota composition and metabolic profiles. Nutr 78:110863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110863
doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110863
Wang Y, Gong L, Wu Y-P, Cui Z-W, Wang Y-Q, Huang Y, Zhang X-P, Li W-F (2019) Oral administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG to newborn piglets augments gut barrier function in pre-weaning piglets. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 20(2):180–192. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800022
doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800022 pubmed: 30666850 pmcid: 6381001
Korpela K, Salonen A, Virta LJ, Kumpu M, Kekkonen RA, de Vos WM (2016) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG intake modifies preschool children’s intestinal microbiota, alleviates penicillin-associated changes, and reduces antibiotic use. PLoS One 11(4):e0154012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154012
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154012 pubmed: 27111772 pmcid: 4844131
Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Geier MS, Moore RJ (2016) Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria. Front Microbiol 7:187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00187
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00187 pubmed: 26925052 pmcid: 4760072
Khan S, Chousalkar KK (2020) Salmonella Typhimurium infection disrupts but continuous feeding of Bacillus based probiotic restores gut microbiota in infected hens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 11:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7
doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7 pubmed: 32211190 pmcid: 7087389
Mohammedsaeed W, McBain AJ, Cruickshank SM, O’Neill CA (2014) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG inhibits the toxic effects of Staphylococcus aureus on epidermal keratinocytes. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(18):5773–5781. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00861-14
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00861-14 pubmed: 25015889 pmcid: 4178598
Kalaycı Yüksek F, Gümüş D, Gündoğan Gİ, Anğ Küçüker M (2020) Cell-free Lactobacillus sp supernatants modulate Staphylococcus aureus growth, adhesion and invasion to human osteoblast (HOB) cells. Curr Microbiol 78(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02247-1
doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02247-1 pubmed: 33108492
Šikić Pogačar M, Langerholc T, Mičetić-Turk D, Možina SS, Klančnik A (2020) Effect of Lactobacillus spp. on adhesion, invasion, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken and pig small-intestinal epithelial cell lines. BMC Vet Res 16(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-2238-5
Hartmann M, Berditsch M, Hawecker J, Ardakani MF, Gerthsen D, Ulrich AS (2010) Damage of the bacterial cell envelope by antimicrobial peptides gramicidin S and PGLa as revealed by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54(8):3132–3142. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00124-10
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00124-10 pubmed: 20530225 pmcid: 2916356

Auteurs

Dipak Kathayat (D)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Gary Closs (G)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Yosra A Helmy (YA)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Loic Deblais (L)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Vishal Srivastava (V)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Gireesh Rajashekara (G)

Center for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA. rajashekara.2@osu.edu.

Articles similaires

Vancomycin-associated DRESS demonstrates delay in AST abnormalities.

Ahmed Hussein, Kateri L Schoettinger, Jourdan Hydol-Smith et al.
1.00
Humans Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome Vancomycin Female Male
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH