Measuring the accuracy of gridded human population density surfaces: A case study in Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
03
2021
accepted:
03
08
2021
entrez:
1
9
2021
pubmed:
2
9
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Geospatial datasets of population are becoming more common in models used for health policy. Publicly-available maps of human population make a consistent picture from inconsistent census data, and the techniques they use to impute data makes each population map unique. Each mapping model explains its methods, but it can be difficult to know which map is appropriate for which policy work. High quality census datasets, where available, are a unique opportunity to characterize maps by comparing them with truth. We use census data from a bed-net mass-distribution campaign on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, conducted by the Bioko Island Malaria Elimination Program as a gold standard to evaluate LandScan (LS), WorldPop Constrained (WP-C) and WorldPop Unconstrained (WP-U), Gridded Population of the World (GPW), and the High-Resolution Settlement Layer (HRSL). Each layer is compared to the gold-standard using statistical measures to evaluate distribution, error, and bias. We investigated how map choice affects burden estimates from a malaria prevalence model. Specific population layers were able to match the gold-standard distribution at different population densities. LandScan was able to most accurately capture highly urban distribution, HRSL and WP-C matched best at all other lower population densities. GPW and WP-U performed poorly everywhere. Correctly capturing empty pixels is key, and smaller pixel sizes (100 m vs 1 km) improve this. Normalizing areas based on known district populations increased performance. The use of differing population layers in a malaria model showed a disparity in results around transition points between endemicity levels. The metrics in this paper, some of them novel in this context, characterize how these population maps differ from the gold standard census and from each other. We show that the metrics help understand the performance of a population map within a malaria model. The closest match to the census data would combine LandScan within urban areas and the HRSL for rural areas. Researchers should prefer particular maps if health calculations have a strong dependency on knowing where people are not, or if it is important to categorize variation in density within a city.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Geospatial datasets of population are becoming more common in models used for health policy. Publicly-available maps of human population make a consistent picture from inconsistent census data, and the techniques they use to impute data makes each population map unique. Each mapping model explains its methods, but it can be difficult to know which map is appropriate for which policy work. High quality census datasets, where available, are a unique opportunity to characterize maps by comparing them with truth.
METHODS
We use census data from a bed-net mass-distribution campaign on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, conducted by the Bioko Island Malaria Elimination Program as a gold standard to evaluate LandScan (LS), WorldPop Constrained (WP-C) and WorldPop Unconstrained (WP-U), Gridded Population of the World (GPW), and the High-Resolution Settlement Layer (HRSL). Each layer is compared to the gold-standard using statistical measures to evaluate distribution, error, and bias. We investigated how map choice affects burden estimates from a malaria prevalence model.
RESULTS
Specific population layers were able to match the gold-standard distribution at different population densities. LandScan was able to most accurately capture highly urban distribution, HRSL and WP-C matched best at all other lower population densities. GPW and WP-U performed poorly everywhere. Correctly capturing empty pixels is key, and smaller pixel sizes (100 m vs 1 km) improve this. Normalizing areas based on known district populations increased performance. The use of differing population layers in a malaria model showed a disparity in results around transition points between endemicity levels.
DISCUSSION
The metrics in this paper, some of them novel in this context, characterize how these population maps differ from the gold standard census and from each other. We show that the metrics help understand the performance of a population map within a malaria model. The closest match to the census data would combine LandScan within urban areas and the HRSL for rural areas. Researchers should prefer particular maps if health calculations have a strong dependency on knowing where people are not, or if it is important to categorize variation in density within a city.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34469444
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248646
pii: PONE-D-21-07292
pmc: PMC8409626
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0248646Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 2;10(1):3939
pubmed: 31477710
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1504
pubmed: 30496048
Adv Parasitol. 2000;47:1-35
pubmed: 10997203
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 28;13(6):e1002056
pubmed: 27351744
Malar J. 2019 Mar 22;18(1):90
pubmed: 30902070
Malar J. 2018 Feb 5;17(1):62
pubmed: 29402288
Adv Parasitol. 2000;47:173-215
pubmed: 10997207
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 25;775:145836
pubmed: 33631578
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Jan;3(1):81-90
pubmed: 15608702
BMC Med. 2018 May 23;16(1):71
pubmed: 29788968
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0107042
pubmed: 25689585
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Oct;10(10):1073-86
pubmed: 16185243
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Feb 07;9:4
pubmed: 21299885
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):207-211
pubmed: 26375008
Nat Commun. 2019 May 27;10(1):2332
pubmed: 31133635
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 30;14(11):e1002456
pubmed: 29190300
Malar J. 2019 Aug 22;18(1):283
pubmed: 31438979