Detection rate of 18F-Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with non-metastatic hormone sensitive and castrate resistant prostate cancer.


Journal

The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...
ISSN: 1827-1936
Titre abrégé: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101213861

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
medline: 29 5 2023
pubmed: 4 9 2021
entrez: 3 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the detection rate of 18F-choline PET/CT in non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (hsPCa) and non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa), based on the criteria proposed in the phase III SPARTAN trial and with high Gleason Score (GS). Between October 2008 and September 2019, data from a retrospective multicenter study (N.=4 centers), involving patients undergoing One hundred forty patients were included. Of these, 82 patients were affected by hsPCa, and 58 had a CRPCa. Overall, 18F-Choline PET/CT was positive in 99/140 (70.7%). It was positive in 55/82 (67.1%) hsPCa patients and in 44/58 (75.9%) CRPCa subjects, respectively. The site of recurrence at 18F-Choline PET/CT were: 16 (27.6%) and 20 (24.4%) in prostatic bed, 25 (43.1%) and 24 (29.3%) in loco-regional lymph nodes and in 27 (46.6%) and 28 (34.1%) in distant organs, respectively for CRPCa and hsPCa patients. The optimal cut-off values for PSA at the time of PET/CT for the prediction or recurrence were 0.5 vs. 2.5 ng/mL for all site of recurrence (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.72), 0.48 vs. 3.4 ng/mL for prostatic bed (AUC: 0.60 vs. 0.59), 0.5 vs. 1.5 for loco-regional lymph nodes (AUC: 0.62 vs. 0.57) and 2.2 vs. 2.8 ng/mL for distant metastasis (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.71), respectively in CRPCa and hsPCa (all P=NS). Sensitivities and specificities of 18F-Choline PET/CT for the identification of recurrence disease in all patient population, in hsPCa and CRPCa were 83.7% and 87.5%, 78.9% and 88.9%, 91.4% and 85.7%, respectively. The rate of positive 18F-Choline PET/CT is similar in patients with a hsPCa and CRPCa, in case of low PSAdt and high GS. Therefore, non-metastatic PCa patients should be assessed by molecular imaging, in order to adapt the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To assess the detection rate of 18F-choline PET/CT in non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (hsPCa) and non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa), based on the criteria proposed in the phase III SPARTAN trial and with high Gleason Score (GS).
METHODS METHODS
Between October 2008 and September 2019, data from a retrospective multicenter study (N.=4 centers), involving patients undergoing
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred forty patients were included. Of these, 82 patients were affected by hsPCa, and 58 had a CRPCa. Overall, 18F-Choline PET/CT was positive in 99/140 (70.7%). It was positive in 55/82 (67.1%) hsPCa patients and in 44/58 (75.9%) CRPCa subjects, respectively. The site of recurrence at 18F-Choline PET/CT were: 16 (27.6%) and 20 (24.4%) in prostatic bed, 25 (43.1%) and 24 (29.3%) in loco-regional lymph nodes and in 27 (46.6%) and 28 (34.1%) in distant organs, respectively for CRPCa and hsPCa patients. The optimal cut-off values for PSA at the time of PET/CT for the prediction or recurrence were 0.5 vs. 2.5 ng/mL for all site of recurrence (AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.72), 0.48 vs. 3.4 ng/mL for prostatic bed (AUC: 0.60 vs. 0.59), 0.5 vs. 1.5 for loco-regional lymph nodes (AUC: 0.62 vs. 0.57) and 2.2 vs. 2.8 ng/mL for distant metastasis (AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.71), respectively in CRPCa and hsPCa (all P=NS). Sensitivities and specificities of 18F-Choline PET/CT for the identification of recurrence disease in all patient population, in hsPCa and CRPCa were 83.7% and 87.5%, 78.9% and 88.9%, 91.4% and 85.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The rate of positive 18F-Choline PET/CT is similar in patients with a hsPCa and CRPCa, in case of low PSAdt and high GS. Therefore, non-metastatic PCa patients should be assessed by molecular imaging, in order to adapt the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34477346
pii: S1824-4785.21.03366-5
doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.21.03366-5
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77
fluoromethylcholine 0
Choline N91BDP6H0X
Hormones 0

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

167-173

Auteurs

Fabio Zattoni (F)

Urology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Paolo Artioli (P)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Marta Burei (M)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV), Padua, Italy.

Agostino Chiaravalloti (A)

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.

Franca Chierichetti (F)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

Davide Donner (D)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

Stefano Panareo (S)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Ilaria Rambaldi (I)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Orazio Schillaci (O)

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Unit of Nuclear Medicine, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

Fabrizio Dal Moro (F)

Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Laura Evangelista (L)

Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy - laura.evangelista@unipd.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH