Comparison of 2-year outcomes with CAR T cells (ZUMA-1) vs salvage chemotherapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
Journal
Blood advances
ISSN: 2473-9537
Titre abrégé: Blood Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101698425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 10 2021
26 10 2021
Historique:
received:
18
11
2020
accepted:
20
05
2021
pubmed:
4
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
3
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The SCHOLAR-1 international retrospective study highlighted poor clinical outcomes and survival among patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with conventional chemotherapy. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, demonstrated durable responses in patients with refractory LBCL in the pivotal phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 study (NCT02348216). Here, we compared SCHOLAR-1 with the 2-year outcomes of ZUMA-1. Prior to comparison of clinical outcomes, propensity scoring (based on a broad set of prognostic covariates) was used to create balance between ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 patients. In the pivotal phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1, 101 patients received axi-cel and were evaluable for response and survival. In SCHOLAR-1, 434 and 424 patients were evaluable for response and survival, respectively. ZUMA-1 patients were more heavily pretreated than were SCHOLAR-1 patients. The median follow-up was 27.1 months in ZUMA-1. The objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate were 83% and 54% in ZUMA-1 vs 34% and 12% in SCHOLAR-1, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 54% in ZUMA-1 and 20% in SCHOLAR-1, and a 73% reduction in the risk of death was observed in ZUMA-1 vs SCHOLAR-1. These results were consistent with those of an additional standardization analysis in which strata were limited to 2 prognostic factors (refractory categorization and presence/absence of stem cell transplant after refractoriness to chemotherapy) to conserve sample size. Despite the limitations of a nonrandomized analysis, these results indicate that axi-cel produces durable responses and a substantial survival benefit vs non-CAR T-cell salvage regimens for patients with refractory LBCL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34478487
pii: S2473-9529(21)00502-4
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003848
pmc: PMC8945634
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4149-4155Informations de copyright
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
Références
Blood. 2017 Oct 19;130(16):1800-1808
pubmed: 28774879
Oncologist. 2020 Oct;25(10):894-902
pubmed: 32339368
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244
pubmed: 10561185
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):931-42
pubmed: 25030467
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86
pubmed: 17242396
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90
pubmed: 20660832
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):155-165
pubmed: 31693429
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 15;23(19):2937-60
pubmed: 15351954
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852
pubmed: 32888407
Mol Ther. 2017 Jan 4;25(1):285-295
pubmed: 28129122
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3506-12
pubmed: 25267745
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):281-290
pubmed: 31697310
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan;51(1):51-7
pubmed: 26367239
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3373-87
pubmed: 23526267
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3490-6
pubmed: 25267740
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Nov 12;66(6):443-459
pubmed: 27618563
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):45-56
pubmed: 30501490
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e321-e327
pubmed: 32043764
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):830-9
pubmed: 24117096
Ann Hematol. 2012 Jun;91(6):931-9
pubmed: 22245922
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2531-2544
pubmed: 29226797
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 May;10(5):267-76
pubmed: 23546520
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 1;32(10):1066-73
pubmed: 24550425
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4462-9
pubmed: 23091101