Reaching higher: External scapula assistance can improve upper limb function in humans with irreversible scapula alata.
Daily life
Muscle weakness
Muscular dystrophy
Scapula Assistance Test
Scapula alata
Scapula orthosis
Scapular fusion
Winging scapula
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2021
03 09 2021
Historique:
received:
09
04
2021
accepted:
23
08
2021
entrez:
4
9
2021
pubmed:
5
9
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Scapular dyskinesis, i.e., the deviant mobility or function of the scapula, hampers upper limb function in daily life. A typical sign of scapular dyskinesis is a scapula alata-a protrusion of the shoulder blade during arm elevation. While some reversible causes of scapula alata can be treated with therapy, other, irreversible causes require invasive surgical interventions. When surgery is not an option, however, severe limitations arise as standard approaches for assisting the scapula in daily life do not exist. The aim of this study was to quantify functional improvements when external, i.e., non-invasive, scapula assistance is provided. The study was designed as a randomized controlled crossover trial. Eight participants with a scapula alata due to muscular dystrophy performed arm elevations in shoulder flexion and abduction while unassisted (baseline), externally assisted by a trained therapist, and externally assisted by a novel, textile-based scapula orthosis. With therapist assistance, average arm elevation increased by 17.3° in flexion (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval of the mean [Formula: see text]), and by 11.2° in abduction (p < 0.01, [Formula: see text]), constituting the potential of external scapula assistance. With orthosis assistance, average arm elevation increased by 6.2° in flexion ([Formula: see text]) and by 5.8° in abduction ([Formula: see text]). Remarkably, in three participants, the orthosis was at least as effective as the therapist. Moreover, orthosis assistance reduced average perceived exertion by 1.25 points (Borg Scale) when elevating a filled bottle during a simulated daily living task. These findings indicate a large potential for future advancements in orthotics. Already now, the textile-based scapula orthosis presented here is a feasible tool for leveraging the benefits of external scapula assistance when a therapist is unavailable, as encountered in daily life scenarios. Trial Registration ClincalTrials.gov (ID NCT04154098). Registered: November 6th 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04154098?term=scapula+orthosis&draw=2&rank=1.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Scapular dyskinesis, i.e., the deviant mobility or function of the scapula, hampers upper limb function in daily life. A typical sign of scapular dyskinesis is a scapula alata-a protrusion of the shoulder blade during arm elevation. While some reversible causes of scapula alata can be treated with therapy, other, irreversible causes require invasive surgical interventions. When surgery is not an option, however, severe limitations arise as standard approaches for assisting the scapula in daily life do not exist. The aim of this study was to quantify functional improvements when external, i.e., non-invasive, scapula assistance is provided.
METHODS
The study was designed as a randomized controlled crossover trial. Eight participants with a scapula alata due to muscular dystrophy performed arm elevations in shoulder flexion and abduction while unassisted (baseline), externally assisted by a trained therapist, and externally assisted by a novel, textile-based scapula orthosis.
RESULTS
With therapist assistance, average arm elevation increased by 17.3° in flexion (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval of the mean [Formula: see text]), and by 11.2° in abduction (p < 0.01, [Formula: see text]), constituting the potential of external scapula assistance. With orthosis assistance, average arm elevation increased by 6.2° in flexion ([Formula: see text]) and by 5.8° in abduction ([Formula: see text]). Remarkably, in three participants, the orthosis was at least as effective as the therapist. Moreover, orthosis assistance reduced average perceived exertion by 1.25 points (Borg Scale) when elevating a filled bottle during a simulated daily living task.
CONCLUSION
These findings indicate a large potential for future advancements in orthotics. Already now, the textile-based scapula orthosis presented here is a feasible tool for leveraging the benefits of external scapula assistance when a therapist is unavailable, as encountered in daily life scenarios. Trial Registration ClincalTrials.gov (ID NCT04154098). Registered: November 6th 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04154098?term=scapula+orthosis&draw=2&rank=1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34479574
doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00926-z
pii: 10.1186/s12984-021-00926-z
pmc: PMC8414749
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04154098']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
131Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Mar;75(3):372-6
pubmed: 8444915
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Mar;24(3):246-53
pubmed: 19200628
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2014 Jun 25;4(2):e12
pubmed: 30775119
Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Jan;6(1):4-11
pubmed: 27582902
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;17(6):943-6
pubmed: 18804388
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Nov;60-B(4):547-51
pubmed: 711807
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955 Jun;37-A(3):567-74
pubmed: 14381453
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
pubmed: 15844264
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995 Nov;3(6):319-325
pubmed: 10790670
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 May-Jun;5(3):201-5
pubmed: 8816339
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 7;95(15):1404-8
pubmed: 23925745
Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233-7
pubmed: 15676628
J Neurosci. 1984 Nov;4(11):2745-54
pubmed: 6502203
J Biomech. 2007;40(10):2119-29
pubmed: 17222853
J Appl Physiol. 1976 Apr;40(4):597-600
pubmed: 931880
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jan;72(1):78-84
pubmed: 2295676
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 09;12:112
pubmed: 26651329
Clin Med Res. 2007 Oct;5(3):155-62
pubmed: 18056023
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81
pubmed: 7154893
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2650-7
pubmed: 25910775
Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):868-74
pubmed: 25935796
Neurology. 1989 Apr;39(4):475-81
pubmed: 2927672
Brain Res. 2011 Mar 25;1382:137-46
pubmed: 21276425
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:423-428
pubmed: 31374666
Biol Cybern. 1983;46(2):135-47
pubmed: 6838914
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jun;60(4):476-80
pubmed: 670269
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1995;209(4):215-23
pubmed: 8907215
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):390-7
pubmed: 26231154
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Mar;24(3):482-90
pubmed: 25306492
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Mar;29(3):248-56
pubmed: 24451064
J Med Life. 2010 Apr-Jun;3(2):149-53
pubmed: 20968200
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jan;29(1):68-78
pubmed: 31378683
Obere Extrem. 2017;12(2):103-108
pubmed: 28868087
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Aug;30(7):635-46
pubmed: 26510934
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Feb 22;16(1):29
pubmed: 30791919
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Oct;79(10):1226-30
pubmed: 9779675
J Hand Ther. 2009 Oct-Dec;22(4):328-42; quiz 343
pubmed: 19665864
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD003278
pubmed: 20091543
J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):749-51
pubmed: 8245200