Association of COVID-19 Lockdown With the Tumor Burden in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Adult
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ blood
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Cohort Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Communicable Disease Control
/ organization & administration
Controlled Before-After Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pandemics
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SARS-CoV-2
Tumor Burden
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2021
01 09 2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
9
2021
pubmed:
9
9
2021
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with substantial reduction in screening, case identification, and hospital referrals among patients with cancer. However, no study has quantitatively examined the implications of this correlation for cancer patient management. To evaluate the association of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown with the tumor burden of patients who were diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) before vs after lockdown. This cohort study analyzed participants in the screening procedure of the PANIRINOX (Phase II Randomized Study Comparing FOLFIRINOX + Panitumumab vs FOLFOX + Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Stratified by RAS Status from Circulating DNA Analysis) phase 2 randomized clinical trial. These newly diagnosed patients received care at 1 of 18 different clinical centers in France and were recruited before or after the lockdown was enacted in France in the spring of 2020. Patients underwent a blood-sampling screening procedure to identify their RAS and BRAF tumor status. mCRC. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis was used to identify RAS and BRAF status. Tumor burden was evaluated by the total plasma ctDNA concentration. The median ctDNA concentration was compared in patients who underwent screening before (November 11, 2019, to March 9, 2020) vs after (May 14 to September 3, 2020) lockdown and in patients who were included from the start of the PANIRINOX study. A total of 80 patients were included, of whom 40 underwent screening before and 40 others underwent screening after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. These patients included 48 men (60.0%) and 32 women (40.0%) and had a median (range) age of 62 (37-77) years. The median ctDNA concentration was statistically higher in patients who were newly diagnosed after lockdown compared with those who were diagnosed before lockdown (119.2 ng/mL vs 17.3 ng/mL; P < .001). Patients with mCRC and high ctDNA concentration had lower median survival compared with those with lower concentration (14.7 [95% CI, 8.8-18.0] months vs 20.0 [95% CI, 14.1-32.0] months). This finding points to the potential adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and related lockdown. This cohort study found that tumor burden differed between patients who received an mCRC diagnosis before vs after the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. The findings of this study suggest that CRC is a major area for intervention to minimize pandemic-associated delays in screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34495337
pii: 2784019
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24483
pmc: PMC8427376
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2124483Références
BMC Med. 2018 Oct 2;16(1):166
pubmed: 30285732
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1088-1095
pubmed: 31046124
Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 01;28(9):2149-2159
pubmed: 28911069
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e043828
pubmed: 33203640
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2017267
pubmed: 32749465
Front Oncol. 2018 Jul 24;8:275
pubmed: 30087854
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1023-1034
pubmed: 32702310
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Dec 22;:1-17
pubmed: 31865831
Nat Cancer. 2020 May;1(5):473-476
pubmed: 35121981
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 14;10(1):13809
pubmed: 32796872
BMJ. 2020 Nov 4;371:m4087
pubmed: 33148535
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 26;9(1):5220
pubmed: 30914716
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Apr;17(4):223-238
pubmed: 28233803
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jun;96:115-124
pubmed: 29729562
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Nov;5(11):845-56
pubmed: 16239904
Nat Cancer. 2020 Jun;1(6):565-567
pubmed: 35121972
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4578-4591
pubmed: 28400427
J Clin Pathol. 2021 Mar;74(3):187-189
pubmed: 32561524
Mol Carcinog. 2020 Dec;59(12):1362-1370
pubmed: 33051887
Clin Chem. 2019 May;65(5):623-633
pubmed: 30792266
Mol Oncol. 2014 Jul;8(5):927-41
pubmed: 24698732
Science. 2020 Jun 19;368(6497):1290
pubmed: 32554570
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):1035-1044
pubmed: 32702311
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020 Jul 29;7(18):2000486
pubmed: 32999827
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236860
pubmed: 32726361
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):3067-77
pubmed: 26847055
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1995-2005
pubmed: 28982739
Lancet. 2005 Jan 8-14;365(9454):153-65
pubmed: 15639298
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 16;20(1):1006
pubmed: 33066758
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):579-86
pubmed: 24449238
Mol Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan;18(1):196-203
pubmed: 30301865
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;18(1):3-4
pubmed: 33097915
Future Oncol. 2019 May;15(15):1745-1758
pubmed: 31038364
Oncologist. 2011;16(9):1228-38
pubmed: 21859820
Oncologist. 2021 Feb;26(2):e338-e341
pubmed: 33111460
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jan;56(1):7-16
pubmed: 28010185
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):750-751
pubmed: 32359403
ESMO Open. 2020 May;5(Suppl 3):
pubmed: 32457036
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9
pubmed: 25046131
Nat Med. 2014 Apr;20(4):430-5
pubmed: 24658074
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Sep;35(3):347-76
pubmed: 27392603