The Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties in the Working Context of Malaysia.
cognitive processes
confirmatory factor analysis
executive functioning
psychometric
reliability
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 08 2021
26 08 2021
Historique:
received:
11
07
2021
revised:
08
08
2021
accepted:
13
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Executive functions (EFs) are a set of high-level cognitive and behavioral monitoring skills that are important to employees' work performance. The 25-item Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised (ESQ-R) measures executive dysfunction in five dimensions (e.g., emotional regulation). Nevertheless, the usability of this newly developed scale for employees remains unclear. The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the adopted ESQ-R for working adults in Malaysia. A total of 325 employees responded to an online survey consisted of the ESQ-R, Executive Function Index (EFI), self-rated creativity scale (SRCS), and 9-item Utretch Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) and Employee Well-being Scale. Several CFAs were conducted to compare three competing models. While all models showed a good fit, the 5-factor second-order model that is in line with the theoretical structure is preferable. The ESQ-R showed excellent internal consistency. Moreover, the ESQ-R score was negatively correlated with EFI, creativity, and UWES-9 scores, supporting the convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. The ESQ-R score also explained incremental variance in well-being above and beyond scores of the UWES-9 and SRCS. Taken together, the ESQ-R is a useful tool for assessing employees' executive dysfunction and suggesting intervention programs helping employees with deficits in EFs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34501571
pii: ijerph18178978
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178978
pmc: PMC8430784
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:122-41
pubmed: 17717092
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 30;7:1524
pubmed: 27746759
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1):
pubmed: 28497641
Emotion. 2010 Oct;10(5):739-44
pubmed: 21038959
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Apr;53(2):365-82
pubmed: 20360462
Work. 2010;36(4):389-98
pubmed: 20714094
Front Psychol. 2019 May 15;10:1097
pubmed: 31156513
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:1048-1054
pubmed: 33601677
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):300-312
pubmed: 29154579
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):159-164
pubmed: 29694315
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14
pubmed: 22773897
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jan;91(1):185-92
pubmed: 16435948
Int J Neurosci. 2005 May;115(5):649-67
pubmed: 15823930
Neuropsychology. 2019 Feb;33(2):212-221
pubmed: 30589284
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;17(6):
pubmed: 32204436
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 21;5:346
pubmed: 29312919
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):73-80
pubmed: 30664414
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25
pubmed: 17535464
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):369-87
pubmed: 27571021
Autism. 2017 Aug;21(6):690-702
pubmed: 27899710
Pers Individ Dif. 2012 Sep;53-334(4):480-485
pubmed: 22945970
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
pubmed: 11283309
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:1-7
pubmed: 25556812
Psychol Aging. 2019 Nov;34(7):1005-1020
pubmed: 31580088
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;46(11):1437-44
pubmed: 18049293
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Aug;28(5):425-34
pubmed: 23676185
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Feb;68:47-56
pubmed: 30634127
Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1480-1492
pubmed: 27690176