Cyclophosphamide added to glucocorticoids in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (EXAFIP): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
05
06
2021
revised:
05
07
2021
accepted:
22
07
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
22
3
2022
entrez:
10
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group. In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population.
METHODS
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m
FINDINGS
Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group.
INTERPRETATION
In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients.
FUNDING
Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34506761
pii: S2213-2600(21)00354-4
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00354-4
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glucocorticoids
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02460588']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26-34Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests J-MN reports grants from the French Ministry of Health and Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim. SJ reports personal fees from Actelion, Association pour les Insuffisants Respiratoires de Bretagne, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galacto Biotech, Genzyme, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, LVL Medical, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Savara-Serendex; and received funding for clinical trials from Bellorophon Therapeutics, Biogen, Olam Pharm, and Pliant Therapeutics. RB reports grants from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche; and personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Roche, Sanofi, and SAvara. AB has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron; has provided consultancy for Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, MedinCell, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Regeneron; and has acted as an investigator or co-investigator for trials sponsored by Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Vertex. PB reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Chiesi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Stallergene, and Teva. SM-A reports personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche. FG reports grants from Resmed; personal fees from Actelion, Cidelec, Novartis, Nyxoah, Resmed, and Sefam; and non-financial support from Asten, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Nyxoah, and Sefam. SD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. AT reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Chiesi; and travel accomodation fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and Vitalaire. PYB reports grants from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche; and personal fees from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche. MPD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. GB reports non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim France, Novartis Pharma, and Roche. LW-S reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. CC reports grants from Santelys; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. DV reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. BC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genzyme, Roche, and Sanofi; non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. VC reports personal fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Fibrogen, Galapagos, Galecto, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Promedior, Roche, Sanofi, and Shionogi; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Promedior, and Roche. TS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. HN reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech; personal fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, and Roche/Genentech; and was the investigator of a clinical trial for Galecto Biotech AB, Gilead, Novartis, and Sanofi, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.