Nintedanib in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Subgroup Analyses by Autoantibody Status and Modified Rodnan Skin Thickness Score.
Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2326-5205
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
revised:
16
06
2021
received:
13
07
2020
accepted:
31
08
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
13
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Using data from the SENSCIS trial, these analyses were undertaken to assess the effects of nintedanib versus placebo in subgroups of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), based on characteristics previously identified as being associated with the progression of SSc-ILD. Patients with SSc-ILD were randomized to receive either nintedanib or placebo, stratified by anti-topoisomerase I antibody (ATA) status. We assessed the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (expressed in ml/year) over 52 weeks in subgroups based on baseline ATA status, modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) (<18 versus ≥18), and SSc subtype (limited cutaneous SSc [lcSSc] versus diffuse cutaneous SSc [dcSSc]). At baseline, 60.8% of 576 patients who received treatment with either nintedanib or placebo were positive for ATA, 51.9% had dcSSc, and 77.5% of 574 patients with MRSS data available had an MRSS of <18. The effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) was numerically more pronounced in ATA-negative patients compared to ATA-positive patients (adjusted difference in the rate of FVC decline, 57.2 ml/year [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -3.5, 118.0] versus 29.9 ml/year [95% CI -19.1, 78.8]), in patients with a baseline MRSS ≥18 compared to those with a baseline MRSS of <18 (adjusted difference in the rate of FVC decline, 88.7 ml/year [95% CI 7.7, 169.8] versus 26.4 ml/year [95% CI -16.8, 69.6]), and in patients with dcSSc compared to those with lcSSc (adjusted difference in the rate of FVC decline, 56.6 ml/year [95% CI 3.2, 110.0] versus 25.3 ml/year [95% CI -28.9, 79.6]). However, all exploratory interaction P values were nonsignificant (all P > 0.05), indicating that there was no heterogeneity in the effect of nintedanib versus placebo between these subgroups of patients. In patients with SSc-ILD, reduction in the annual rate of decline in FVC among patients receiving nintedanib compared to those receiving placebo was not found to be heterogenous across subgroups based on ATA status, MRSS, or SSc subtype.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34514739
doi: 10.1002/art.41965
pmc: PMC9306495
doi:
Substances chimiques
Autoantibodies
0
Indoles
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
nintedanib
G6HRD2P839
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
518-526Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(5):R166
pubmed: 20813056
J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):202-5
pubmed: 3361530
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):96-106
pubmed: 33412120
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;69(8):1670-1678
pubmed: 28426895
Autoimmun Rev. 2020 Feb;19(2):102452
pubmed: 31838157
Eur Respir J. 2010 Jan;35(1):112-7
pubmed: 19541715
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38
pubmed: 16055882
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 3;197(5):644-652
pubmed: 29099620
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jun;66(6):754-63
pubmed: 17234652
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1355-60
pubmed: 22615460
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):465-476
pubmed: 31682743
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Mar;38(3):363-374
pubmed: 29322341
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1743-8
pubmed: 27016052
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 May;78(5):648-656
pubmed: 30852552
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2020 Mar;5(2 Suppl):31-40
pubmed: 33693056
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul 15;61(7):958-65
pubmed: 19565553
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Apr;73(4):671-676
pubmed: 33142016
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;66(6):1625-35
pubmed: 24591477
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov 15;200(10):1258-1266
pubmed: 31310156
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1285-92
pubmed: 26232495
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Aug;35(1):35-42
pubmed: 16084222
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2019 Oct;4(3):212-218
pubmed: 35382502
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2737-47
pubmed: 24122180
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2017 Jan-Apr;2(1):11-18
pubmed: 28516167
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Sep 1;57(9):1623-1631
pubmed: 29868924
J Nippon Med Sch. 2017;84(2):56-63
pubmed: 28502960
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Nov;43(11):2445-54
pubmed: 11083267
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518-2528
pubmed: 31112379
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1897-1905
pubmed: 28835464
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):184-9
pubmed: 25959492