Periprocedural changes in natriuretic peptide levels and clinical outcome after transcatheter mitral valve repair.
Mitral regurgitation
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
Transcatheter mitral valve repair
Journal
ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
revised:
16
08
2021
received:
23
06
2021
accepted:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
15
9
2021
medline:
22
3
2022
entrez:
14
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This multicentre study investigated the association of periprocedural changes in the levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with clinical outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR). Patients were retrospectively analysed who underwent TMVR with the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and had available sequential NT-proBNP testing at baseline and 2 months after TMVR. Periprocedural changes in NT-proBNP following TMVR were assessed as the percent change in NT-proBNP between baseline and the 2 month follow-up, and the significant reduction in NT-proBNP was defined as a decrease of >30% in the follow-up NT-proBNP compared with the pre-procedural NT-proBNP level. Primary outcome was defined as a composite outcome consisting of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure from 2 months to 2 years after TMVR. Additionally, we identified the cut-off value of pre-procedural NT-proBNP to predict the composite outcome using a receiver operating characteristic analysis (cut-off: 2485 pg/mL). Of 485 patients undergoing TMVR (age: 76.2 ± 9.2 years, female: 42.1%, secondary mitral regurgitation: 67.2%), 150 patients (30.9%) had the significant reduction in NT-proBNP (>30%) following the procedure. Patients with the NT-proBNP reduction had a lower incidence of the composite outcome, compared with those without the reduction in NT-proBNP (31.4% vs. 40.2%; log-rank P = 0.03). The significant reduction in NT-proBNP was also associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.97; P = 0.04], independently of pre-procedural NT-proBNP levels and other clinical parameters. The percent change in NT-proBNP was associated with a linear trend of the incidence of the composite outcome (adjusted HR per 10% decrease: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98; P < 0.001). A stratified analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of the significant reduction in NT-proBNP was consistent among clinical subgroups, including aetiology of mitral regurgitation (P for interaction = 0.99). Higher pre-procedural NT-proBNP level (>2485 pg/mL) was associated with the increased risk of the composite outcome (adjusted HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.03-2.17; P = 0.03); however, patients with a higher pre-procedural NT-proBNP who achieved the significant reduction in NT-proBNP had a similar risk of the composite outcome to those with a lower pre-procedural NT-proBNP. Changes in sequential NT-proBNP measurements were associated with clinical outcomes within 2 years after TMVR. The assessment of NT-proBNP dynamics may be valuable to assess the residual risk for patients undergoing TMVR and could assist with post-procedural management after TMVR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34519444
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13603
pmc: PMC8712850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5237-5247Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 1;119(9):1443-1449
pubmed: 28274574
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Oct;13(10):1096-103
pubmed: 21715446
EuroIntervention. 2021 Nov 19;17(10):827-834
pubmed: 33646125
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2297-2306
pubmed: 30145927
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25;12(6):569-578
pubmed: 30898255
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):797-805
pubmed: 21366472
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;54(12):1099-106
pubmed: 19744620
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 11;55(19):2034-48
pubmed: 20447526
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Feb;13(2):163-9
pubmed: 21051463
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):353-362
pubmed: 30553663
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 14;364(15):1395-406
pubmed: 21463154
Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):384-92
pubmed: 27296161
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
J Card Fail. 2018 Mar;24(3):137-145
pubmed: 29292112
Circulation. 2003 Mar 11;107(9):1278-83
pubmed: 12628948
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 3;74(9):1205-1217
pubmed: 31466618
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 18;50(25):2357-68
pubmed: 18154959
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 2;64(9):875-84
pubmed: 25169171
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5237-5247
pubmed: 34519444
Circulation. 2005 May 10;111(18):2391-7
pubmed: 15883225
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2307-2318
pubmed: 30280640
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 16;56(21):1712-9
pubmed: 21070922
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;7(2):158-168
pubmed: 30611722
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 23;12(24):2562-2564
pubmed: 31857031
Int Heart J. 2017 Apr 6;58(2):225-231
pubmed: 28216549
EuroIntervention. 2014 Oct;10(6):746-52
pubmed: 24469474
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 1;115(1):69-74
pubmed: 25456879
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):303-371
pubmed: 28314623
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 21;66(3):308-321
pubmed: 26184623
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 6;68(22):2425-2436
pubmed: 27908347
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1150-1158
pubmed: 30191666
J Cardiol. 2015 Oct;66(4):279-85
pubmed: 25851471