Update: Gender differences in CABG outcomes-Have we bridged the gap?
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
08
02
2021
accepted:
11
07
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Appreciation of unique presentation, patterns and underlying pathophysiology of coronary artery disease in women has driven gender based risk stratification and risk reduction efforts over the last decade. Data regarding whether these advances have resulted in unequivocal improvements in outcomes of CABG in women is conflicting. The objective of our study was to assess gender differences in post-operative outcomes following CABG. Retrospective analyses of institutional data housed in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database for patients undergoing CABG between 2002 and 2020 were conducted. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to investigate gender differences in post-operative outcomes. P-values were adjusted using Bonferroni correction to reduce type-I errors. Our final cohort of 6,250 patients had fewer women than men (1,339 vs. 4,911). more women were diabetic (52.0% vs. 41.2%, p<0.001) and hypertensive (89.1% vs. 84.0%, p<0.001). Women had higher adjusted odds of developing ventilator dependence >48 hours (OR: 1.65 [1.21, 2.45], p = 0.002) and cardiac readmissions (OR: 1.56 [1.27, 2.30], p = 0.003). After adjustment for comorbidity burden, mortality rates in women were comparable to those of age-matched men. The findings of our study indicate that despite apparent reduction of differences in mortality, the burden of postoperative morbidity is still high among women.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Appreciation of unique presentation, patterns and underlying pathophysiology of coronary artery disease in women has driven gender based risk stratification and risk reduction efforts over the last decade. Data regarding whether these advances have resulted in unequivocal improvements in outcomes of CABG in women is conflicting. The objective of our study was to assess gender differences in post-operative outcomes following CABG.
METHODS
Retrospective analyses of institutional data housed in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database for patients undergoing CABG between 2002 and 2020 were conducted. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to investigate gender differences in post-operative outcomes. P-values were adjusted using Bonferroni correction to reduce type-I errors.
RESULTS
Our final cohort of 6,250 patients had fewer women than men (1,339 vs. 4,911). more women were diabetic (52.0% vs. 41.2%, p<0.001) and hypertensive (89.1% vs. 84.0%, p<0.001). Women had higher adjusted odds of developing ventilator dependence >48 hours (OR: 1.65 [1.21, 2.45], p = 0.002) and cardiac readmissions (OR: 1.56 [1.27, 2.30], p = 0.003). After adjustment for comorbidity burden, mortality rates in women were comparable to those of age-matched men.
CONCLUSION
The findings of our study indicate that despite apparent reduction of differences in mortality, the burden of postoperative morbidity is still high among women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34525123
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255170
pii: PONE-D-21-04316
pmc: PMC8443029
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0255170Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Jun;27(4):319-26
pubmed: 26945187
Med J Aust. 2018 Aug 6;209(3):118-123
pubmed: 30025513
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;45(6):832-7
pubmed: 15766815
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jun;32(11):1331-6
pubmed: 21317147
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Dec;80(6):876-87
pubmed: 6968859
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 May;101(5):1677-82
pubmed: 26588866
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Jan;36(1):69-78
pubmed: 31740167
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):169-74
pubmed: 10921703
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1887-95
pubmed: 24613159
Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1993 Summer;8(1):6-12
pubmed: 8372090
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):412-9
pubmed: 23313544
Circulation. 1981 Apr;63(4):793-802
pubmed: 6970631
Circulation. 2002 Mar 12;105(10):1176-81
pubmed: 11889010
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):605-13
pubmed: 9718051
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(Suppl 18):S2157-S2159
pubmed: 30123548
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jul;62(1):63-9
pubmed: 8678687
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):633-41
pubmed: 20031902
Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):816-25, 825.e1
pubmed: 19061693
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054
pubmed: 21873419
Circulation. 2003 Nov 25;108(21):2642-7
pubmed: 14597590
Circulation. 2008 Dec 16;118(25):2803-10
pubmed: 19064680
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 Dec;18(12):73
pubmed: 27807732
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2317-22; discussion 2323-5
pubmed: 19029494
Heart. 2002 Jul;88(1):7-9
pubmed: 12067929
Circulation. 1993 Nov;88(5 Pt 1):2104-10
pubmed: 8222104
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Dec;10(7):839-43
pubmed: 8969387
World J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 26;7(1):10-8
pubmed: 25632314
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Jun;65(6):627-33; discussion 634
pubmed: 17629824
Am J Crit Care. 2001 Mar;10(2):112-6
pubmed: 11244668