Nonresponder bias in hand surgery: analysis of 1945 cases lost to follow-up over a 6-year period.
Nonresponder bias
dogma
registry
Journal
The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
ISSN: 2043-6289
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Eur Vol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101315820
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
9
2021
medline:
9
3
2022
entrez:
16
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary aim of this study was to identify factors associated with nonresponse to routinely collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after hand surgery. The secondary aim was to investigate the impact of nonresponder bias on postoperative PROMs. We identified 4357 patient episodes for which the patients received pre- and 1-year postoperative questionnaires. The response rate was 55%. Univariate and regression analyses were undertaken to determine factors predicting nonresponse. We developed a predictive model for the postoperative Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores for nonresponders using imputation. Younger age, increasing deprivation, higher comorbidity, worse preoperative QuickDASH scores and unemployment predicted nonresponse. No significant difference in mean postoperative QuickDASH score was observed between the responders, and the scores for the responders combined with the predicted scores for the nonresponders. Preoperative function was the primary predictor of postoperative outcome. These results challenge the dogma that 'loss to follow-up' automatically invalidates the results of a study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34525852
doi: 10.1177/17531934211045627
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM