Biofilm microbiome in extracorporeal membrane oxygenator catheters.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
accepted:
01
09
2021
entrez:
16
9
2021
pubmed:
17
9
2021
medline:
24
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the formation of biofilms on catheters for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), some patients do not show bacteremia. To elucidate the specific linkage between biofilms and bacteremia in patients with ECMO, an improved understanding of the microbial community within catheter biofilms is necessary. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the biofilm microbiome of ECMO catheters from adults with (n = 6) and without (n = 15) bacteremia. The microbiomes of the catheter biofilms were evaluated by profiling the V3 and V4 regions of bacterial 16s rRNA genes using the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. In total, 2,548,172 reads, with an average of 121,341 reads per sample, were generated. Although alpha diversity was slightly higher in the non-bacteremic group, the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, there was no difference in beta diversity between the two groups. We found 367 different genera, of which 8 were present in all samples regardless of group; Limnohabitans, Flavobacterium, Delftia, Massilia, Bacillus, Candidatus, Xiphinematobacter, and CL0-1 showed an abundance of more than 1% in the sample. In particular, Arthrobacter, SMB53, Neisseria, Ortrobactrum, Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia, Deefgae, Dyella, Paracoccus, and Pedobacter were highly abundant in the bacteremic group. Network analysis indicated that the microbiome of the bacteremic group was more complex than that of the non-bacteremic group. Flavobacterium and CL0.1, which were abundant in the bacteremic group, were considered important genera because they connected different subnetworks. Biofilm characteristics in ECMO catheters varied according to the presence or absence of bacteremia. There were no significant differences in diversity between the two groups, but there were significant differences in the community composition of the biofilms. The biofilm-associated community was dynamic, with the bacteremic group showing very complex network connections within the microbiome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34529734
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257449
pii: PONE-D-21-05687
pmc: PMC8445415
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0257449Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Aug;34(8):1908-13
pubmed: 8818879
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;22(7):537-540
pubmed: 30111931
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 25;17:138
pubmed: 27015812
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002687
pubmed: 23028285
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016 Nov 23;2:3
pubmed: 28649397
Pathogens. 2021 Apr 08;10(4):
pubmed: 33917709
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Feb;60(Pt 2):246-248
pubmed: 20965913
IDCases. 2019 Jan 09;15:e00486
pubmed: 30701158
Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60
pubmed: 21702898
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0227967
pubmed: 31945114
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21
pubmed: 23975157
Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1318-22
pubmed: 10334980
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;13(8):1266-7
pubmed: 17953113
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 15;52(8):1038-45
pubmed: 21460321
Braz J Microbiol. 2016 Dec;47 Suppl 1:86-98
pubmed: 27825606
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Sep 3;8(8):367-377
pubmed: 31537994
J Artif Organs. 2016 Jun;19(2):128-33
pubmed: 26721824
ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):e48-e54
pubmed: 29356690
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;23(3):550-5
pubmed: 8879779