Prognostic significance of chromosomal abnormalities at relapse in children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study of the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study.
chromosomal instability
clonal evolution
core-binding factor leukemia
cytogenetics
karyotypic change(s)
pediatric acute myeloid leukemia/pediatric AML
relapsed AML
Journal
Pediatric blood & cancer
ISSN: 1545-5017
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Blood Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101186624
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
revised:
30
07
2021
received:
15
02
2021
accepted:
18
08
2021
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
4
3
2022
entrez:
17
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In addition to treatment response, cytogenetic and molecular aberrations are the most important prognostic factors in children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, little is known about cytogenetics at the time of relapse. This international study analyzed the prognostic value of cytogenetic profiles and karyotypic changes in pediatric relapsed AML in relation to the probability of event-free (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS). For this purpose, cytogenetic reports from all patients registered on the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study were reviewed and classified. Cytogenetic information at relapse was available for 403 (71%) of 569 registered patients. Frequently detected aberrations at relapse were t(8;21)(q22;q22) (n = 60) and inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) (n = 24), both associated with relatively good outcome (4-year pOS 59% and 71%, respectively). Monosomy 7/7q-, t(9;11)(p22;q23), t(10;11)(p12;q23), and complex karyotypes were associated with poor outcomes (4-year pOS 17%, 19%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). Of 261 (65%) patients for whom cytogenetic data were reliable at both diagnosis and relapse, pEFS was inferior for patients with karyotypic instability (n = 128, 49%), but pOS was similar. Unstable karyotypes with both gain and loss of aberrations were associated with inferior outcome. Early treatment response, time to relapse, and cytogenetic profile at time of relapse were the most important prognostic factors, both outweighing karytoypic instability per se. The cytogenetic subgroup at relapse is an independent risk factor for (event-free) survival. Cytogenetic assessment at the time of relapse is of high importance and may contribute to improved risk-adapted treatment for children with relapsed AML.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In addition to treatment response, cytogenetic and molecular aberrations are the most important prognostic factors in children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, little is known about cytogenetics at the time of relapse.
METHODS
This international study analyzed the prognostic value of cytogenetic profiles and karyotypic changes in pediatric relapsed AML in relation to the probability of event-free (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS). For this purpose, cytogenetic reports from all patients registered on the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study were reviewed and classified.
RESULTS
Cytogenetic information at relapse was available for 403 (71%) of 569 registered patients. Frequently detected aberrations at relapse were t(8;21)(q22;q22) (n = 60) and inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) (n = 24), both associated with relatively good outcome (4-year pOS 59% and 71%, respectively). Monosomy 7/7q-, t(9;11)(p22;q23), t(10;11)(p12;q23), and complex karyotypes were associated with poor outcomes (4-year pOS 17%, 19%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). Of 261 (65%) patients for whom cytogenetic data were reliable at both diagnosis and relapse, pEFS was inferior for patients with karyotypic instability (n = 128, 49%), but pOS was similar. Unstable karyotypes with both gain and loss of aberrations were associated with inferior outcome. Early treatment response, time to relapse, and cytogenetic profile at time of relapse were the most important prognostic factors, both outweighing karytoypic instability per se.
CONCLUSION
The cytogenetic subgroup at relapse is an independent risk factor for (event-free) survival. Cytogenetic assessment at the time of relapse is of high importance and may contribute to improved risk-adapted treatment for children with relapsed AML.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e29341Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Blood. 2000;96(13):4075-4083.
Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998;92(7):2322-2333.
Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood. 2002;100(13):4325-4336.
von Neuhoff C, Reinhardt D, Sander A, et al. Prognostic impact of specific chromosomal aberrations in a large group of pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated uniformly according to trial AML-BFM 98. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2682-2689.
Harrison CJ, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al. Cytogenetics of childhood acute myeloid leukemia: United Kingdom Medical Research Council Treatment trials AML 10 and 12. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2674-2681.
Weltermann A, Fonatsch C, Haas OA, et al. Impact of cytogenetics on the prognosis of adults with de novo AML in first relapse. Leukemia. 2004;18(2):293-302.
Kumar CC. Genetic abnormalities and challenges in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(2):95-107.
Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010;116(3):354-365.
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391-2405.
Creutzig U, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Gibson B, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in children and adolescents: recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2012;120(16):3187-3205.
Zwaan CM, Kolb EA, Reinhardt D, et al. Collaborative efforts driving progress in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):2949-2962.
Kaspers G. How I treat paediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2014;166(5):636-645.
Kaspers GJ, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, et al. Improved outcome in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized trial on liposomal daunorubicin by the International BFM Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(5):599-607.
Kern W, Haferlach T, Schnittger S, Ludwig WD, Hiddemann W, Schoch C. Karyotype instability between diagnosis and relapse in 117 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for resistance against therapy. Leukemia. 2002;16(10):2084-2091.
Kim Y, Jang J, Hyun SY, et al. Karyotypic change between diagnosis and relapse as a predictor of salvage therapy outcome in AML patients. Blood Res. 2013;48(1):24-30.
Testa JR, Mintz U, Rowley JD, Vardiman JW, Golomb HM. Evolution of karyotypes in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Res. 1979;39(9):3619-3627.
Estey E, Keating MJ, Pierce S, Stass S. Change in karyotype between diagnosis and first relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia. 1995;9(6):972-976.
Garson OM, Hagemeijer A, Sakurai M, et al. Cytogenetic studies of 103 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia in relapse. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1989;40(2):187-202.
Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Dworzak MN, et al. The prognostic significance of early treatment response in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01. Haematologica. 2014;99(9):1472-1478.
Webb DK, Wheatley K, Harrison G, Stevens RF, Hann IM. Outcome for children with relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia following initial therapy in the Medical Research Council (MRC) AML 10 trial. MRC Childhood Leukaemia Working Party. Leukemia. 1999;13(1):25-31.
Sandahl JD, Coenen EA, Forestier E, et al. t(6;9)(p22;q34)/DEK-NUP214-rearranged pediatric myeloid leukemia: an international study of 62 patients. Haematologica. 2014;99(5):865-872.
Tarlock K, Alonzo TA, Moraleda PP, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t(6;9)(p23;q34) is associated with poor outcome in childhood AML regardless of FLT3-ITD status: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2014;166(2):254-259.
Gupta M, Ashok Kumar J, Sitaram U, et al. The t(6;9)(p22;q34) in myeloid neoplasms: a retrospective study of 16 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010;203(2):297-302.
Rubnitz JE, Raimondi SC, Tong X, et al. Favorable impact of the t(9;11) in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(9):2302-2309.
Balgobind BV, Raimondi SC, Harbott J, et al. Novel prognostic subgroups in childhood 11q23/MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia: results of an international retrospective study. Blood. 2009;114(12):2489-2496.
Breems DA, Van Putten WL, De Greef GE, et al. Monosomal karyotype in acute myeloid leukemia: a better indicator of poor prognosis than a complex karyotype. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(29):4791-4797.
Lee NH, Choi YB, Yi ES, et al. Monosomal karyotype is not a predictor of dismal outcome in childhood de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2016;50:57-62.
Rasche M, von Neuhoff C, Dworzak M, et al. Genotype-outcome correlations in pediatric AML: the impact of a monosomal karyotype in trial AML-BFM 2004. Leukemia. 2017;31(12):2807-2814.
Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, et al. Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature. 2012;481(7382):506-510.
Greaves M, Maley CC. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature. 2012;481(7381):306-313.
Chucrallah AE, Stass SA, Huh YO, Albitar M, Kantarjian HM. Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia at relapse. Cytogenetic, immunophenotypic, and molecular changes. Cancer. 1995;76(6):985-991.
Vora AJ, Potter AM, Anderson LM, Lilleyman JS. Frequency and importance of change in blast cell karyotype in relapsing childhood lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1994;11(4):379-386.
de Rooij JD, Zwaan CM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M. Pediatric AML: from biology to clinical management. J Clin Med. 2015;4(1):127-149.
Bachas C, Schuurhuis GJ, Reinhardt D, et al. Clinical relevance of molecular aberrations in paediatric acute myeloid leukaemia at first relapse. Br J Haematol. 2014;166(6):902-910.
Bachas C, Schuurhuis GJ, Hollink IH, et al. High-frequency type I/II mutational shifts between diagnosis and relapse are associated with outcome in pediatric AML: implications for personalized medicine. Blood. 2010;116(15):2752-2758.
Bullinger L, Dohner K, Bair E, et al. Use of gene-expression profiling to identify prognostic subclasses in adult acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(16):1605-1616.
Farrar JE, Schuback HL, Ries RE, et al. Genomic profiling of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals a changing mutational landscape from disease diagnosis to relapse. Cancer Res. 2016;76(8):2197-2205.
Klein K, de Haas V, Kaspers GJL. Clinical challenges in de novo pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(3):277-293