Considering the type and timing of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Qualitative insights into women's decision-making.

Breast cancer Breast reconstruction Decision-making Post-mastectomy radiotherapy Qualitative research

Journal

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society
ISSN: 1532-2122
Titre abrégé: Eur J Oncol Nurs
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 100885136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 17 01 2021
revised: 05 05 2021
accepted: 26 08 2021
pubmed: 19 9 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
entrez: 18 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The information women receive about the type and timing of breast reconstruction (BR) from healthcare providers is crucial to help them make an informed decision, and this is particularly important in complex cases and/or high-risk cases. This study sought to provide qualitative insights into Australian women's BR decision-making experiences. Twenty-nine women who had received a mastectomy and made decisions about BR, including the type (expander, implant and/or autologous) and timing (immediate, delayed or immediate-delayed), participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Interviews were analysed thematically using the Framework method. Seven themes were identified: 1) information provision and needs; 2) values and preferences; 3) pressure to decide; 4) feasibility (e.g. clinical and/or financial factors); 5) social influence and support; 6) multidisciplinary team and organisational structures; and 7) decision implementation and outcomes. Breast care nurse support, as well as collaboration and communication within multidisciplinary teams were perceived by women as facilitating the BR decision-making process. The identified themes offer an in-depth explanation of how a sample of Australian women make BR decisions. The current findings highlight the often limited clinician-patient information-sharing and demonstrate the overarching influence of the multidisciplinary medical team and organisational structures on BR decision-making. Development of in-consult decision-aids and strategies to improve multidisciplinary care are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34536790
pii: S1462-3889(21)00130-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102024
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102024

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sarah Giunta (S)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia.

Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell (R)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Lorna Huang (L)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.

Natasha Hatcher (N)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia.

Haryana Dhillon (H)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Danielle M Muscat (DM)

Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Susan Carroll (S)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.

Catriona McNeil (C)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Lucinda Burke (L)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sydney Medical School, NSW, Australia; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Pamela Howson (P)

Strathfield Private Hospital, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.

Belinda Chan (B)

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Strathfield Private Hospital, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.

Ilona Juraskova (I)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: ilona.juraskova@sydney.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH