Optimal Spatial Sensor Design for Magnetic Tracking in a Myokinetic Control Interface.

Magnetic sensors Magnetic tracking Myokinetic control interface Prosthetic hand Sensor optimization

Journal

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
ISSN: 1872-7565
Titre abrégé: Comput Methods Programs Biomed
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8506513

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
received: 10 12 2020
accepted: 03 09 2021
pubmed: 20 9 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
entrez: 19 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Magnetic tracking involves the use of magnetic sensors to localize one or more magnetic objectives, in those applications in which a free line-of-sight between them and the operator is hampered. We applied this concept to prosthetic hands, which could be controlled by tracking permanent magnets implanted in the forearm muscles of amputees (the myokinetic control interface). Concerning the system design, the definition of a sensor distribution which maximizes the information, while minimizing the computational cost of localization, is still an open problem. We present a simple yet effective strategy to define an optimal sensor set for tracking multiple magnets, which we called the Peaks method. We simulated a proximal amputation using a 3D CAD model of a human forearm, and the implantation of 11 magnets in the residual muscles. The Peaks method was applied to select a subset of sensors from an initial grid of 480 elements. The approach involves setting an appropriate threshold to select those sensors associated with the peaks in the magnetic flux density and its gradient distributions. Selected sensors were used to track the magnets during muscle contraction. For validating our strategy, an alternative method based on state-of-the-art solutions was implemented. We finally proposed a calibration phase to customize the sensor distribution on the specific patient's anatomy. 80 sensors were selected with the Peaks method, and 101 with the alternative one. A localization accuracy below 0.22 mm and 1.86° for position and orientation, respectively, was always achieved. Unlike alternative methods from the literature, neither iterative or analytical solution, nor a-priori knowledge on the magnet positions or trajectories were required, and yet the outcomes achieved with the two strategies proved statistically comparable. The calibration phase proved useful to adapt the sensors to the patient's stump and to increase the signal-to-noise ratio against intrinsic noise. We demonstrated an efficient and general solution for solving the design optimization problem (i.e. identifying an optimal sensor set) and reducing the computational cost of localization. The optimal sensor distribution mirrors the field shape traced by the magnets on the sensing surface, being an intuitive and fast way of achieving the same results of more complex and application-specific methods. Several applications in the (bio)medical field involving magnetic tracking will benefit from the outcomes of this work.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Magnetic tracking involves the use of magnetic sensors to localize one or more magnetic objectives, in those applications in which a free line-of-sight between them and the operator is hampered. We applied this concept to prosthetic hands, which could be controlled by tracking permanent magnets implanted in the forearm muscles of amputees (the myokinetic control interface). Concerning the system design, the definition of a sensor distribution which maximizes the information, while minimizing the computational cost of localization, is still an open problem. We present a simple yet effective strategy to define an optimal sensor set for tracking multiple magnets, which we called the Peaks method.
METHODS METHODS
We simulated a proximal amputation using a 3D CAD model of a human forearm, and the implantation of 11 magnets in the residual muscles. The Peaks method was applied to select a subset of sensors from an initial grid of 480 elements. The approach involves setting an appropriate threshold to select those sensors associated with the peaks in the magnetic flux density and its gradient distributions. Selected sensors were used to track the magnets during muscle contraction. For validating our strategy, an alternative method based on state-of-the-art solutions was implemented. We finally proposed a calibration phase to customize the sensor distribution on the specific patient's anatomy.
RESULTS RESULTS
80 sensors were selected with the Peaks method, and 101 with the alternative one. A localization accuracy below 0.22 mm and 1.86° for position and orientation, respectively, was always achieved. Unlike alternative methods from the literature, neither iterative or analytical solution, nor a-priori knowledge on the magnet positions or trajectories were required, and yet the outcomes achieved with the two strategies proved statistically comparable. The calibration phase proved useful to adapt the sensors to the patient's stump and to increase the signal-to-noise ratio against intrinsic noise.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrated an efficient and general solution for solving the design optimization problem (i.e. identifying an optimal sensor set) and reducing the computational cost of localization. The optimal sensor distribution mirrors the field shape traced by the magnets on the sensing surface, being an intuitive and fast way of achieving the same results of more complex and application-specific methods. Several applications in the (bio)medical field involving magnetic tracking will benefit from the outcomes of this work.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34537492
pii: S0169-2607(21)00481-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106407
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106407

Subventions

Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 679820
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Marta Gherardini (M)

The Biorobotics Institute Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: marta.gherardini@santannapisa.it.

Andrea Mannini (A)

The Biorobotics Institute Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.

Christian Cipriani (C)

The Biorobotics Institute Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH