Region of interest optimization for radiation therapy of breast cancer.
breast cancer
radiation therapy
surface guided radiation therapy
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
revised:
11
05
2021
received:
20
10
2020
accepted:
06
08
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
14
10
2021
entrez:
20
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The goal of this study was to investigate how the choice of the region of interest (ROI) affects the registration results of surface imaging for daily positioning of breast cancer patients. The AlignRT system (VisionRT, London) and the XVI Cone beam CT (CBCT; Elekta, Stockholm) installed on two Versa HD linacs (Elekta) were used in this study, which included 28 patients (160 fractions). In the clinical workflow, patients were prepositioned with AlignRT and then shifted in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) according to the CBCT. A new reference capture was taken immediately afterward. Retrospectively, the surface capture resulting from prepositioning was registered to the latest reference capture. By varying the ROI used for registration, the surface-based results were optimized in terms of minimizing the deviation to the clinically applied CBCT shifts. Two sets of ROIs were used: one obtained by applying a variable margin to the breast surface, another by combining ROIs of anatomical structures, including the sternum and contralateral breast. Registration results showed significant differences from one ROI to another. Generally, the results improved with increasing ROI size, especially for rotational DOFs. ROIs, including the axilla or supraclavicular lymph drainage region, did not yield an improved registration result. On the other hand, an ROI comprising the breast surface, sternum, and a belt caudal to the breasts decreased the average magnitude of the translational and rotational deviations by 6.6% and 30.8% (p < 0.01), respectively, compared to the breast surface only results. The influence of the ROI choice on surface imaging registration results was analyzed and the surface-based shifts were compared to clinically applied CBCT shifts. An optimal ROI for the treatment of breast cancer patients, consisting of the breast surface, sternum, and a belt, was identified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34543500
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13410
pmc: PMC8504613
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152-160Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Apr 04;12(3):3422
pubmed: 21844852
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):143
pubmed: 27784326
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Feb;197(2):150-157
pubmed: 33047151
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jan;19(1):25-38
pubmed: 29139223
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Nov;18(6):58-61
pubmed: 28901684
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Oct;22(10):152-160
pubmed: 34543500
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Sep 08;15(5):4921
pubmed: 25207578
Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:151-69
pubmed: 11910059
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 08;17(5):200-211
pubmed: 27685103
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Mar;20(3):97-104
pubmed: 30861276
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):239-247
pubmed: 30914270
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Nov;195(11):964-971
pubmed: 31332457
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun;28(3):185-193
pubmed: 29933878
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Sep;20(9):61-68
pubmed: 31478615
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 24;15(1):244
pubmed: 33099305
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jan-Mar;3(1):16-25
pubmed: 24674259
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 1;85(2):536-42
pubmed: 22652107