Disparities in Physician Compensation by Gender in Ontario, Canada.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2021
01 09 2021
Historique:
entrez:
21
9
2021
pubmed:
22
9
2021
medline:
22
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Men and women should earn equal pay for equal work. An examination of the magnitude of pay disparities could inform strategies for remediation. To examine gender-based differences in pay within a large, comprehensive physician population practicing within a variety of payment systems. This cross-sectional study used data from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) in the 2017 to 2018 fiscal year to estimate differences in gross payments between men and women physicians in Ontario, Canada. Pay gaps were calculated annually and daily. Regression analyses were used to control for observable practice characteristics that could account for individual differences in daily pay. In Canada's largest province, Ontario, medical services are predominantly provided by self-employed physicians who bill the province's single payer, OHIP. All physicians who submitted claims to OHIP were included. Data were analyzed from January 2020 to July 2021. Physician gender, obtained from the OHIP Corporate Provider Database. Gender is recorded as male or female. Gross clinical payments were tabulated for individual physicians on a daily and annual basis in conjunction with each physician's practice characteristics, setting, and specialty. A total of 31 481 physicians were included in the study sample (12 604 [40.0%] women; 18 877 [60.0%] men; mean [SD] time since graduation, 23.3 [13.6] years), representing 99% of active physicians in Ontario. The unadjusted differences in clinical payments between male and female physicians were 32.8% (95% CI, 30.8%-34.6%) annually and 22.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-23.8%) daily. After accounting for practice characteristics, region, and specialty, the overall daily payment gap was 13.5% (95% CI, 12.3%-14.8%). The pay gap persisted with differing magnitudes when examined by specialty (ranging from 6.6% to 37.6%), practice setting (8.3% to 17.2%), payment model (13.4% to 22.8% for family medicine; 8.0% to 11.6% for other specialties), and rurality (8.0% to 16.5%). This cross-sectional study examined differences in magnitude of annual and daily payment gaps and between unadjusted and adjusted gaps. Comparing the gaps for different specialties, geography, and payment systems illustrated the complexity of the issue by showing that the pay gap varied for physicians in different practice settings. As such, multiple directed interventions will be necessary to ensure that all physicians are paid equally for equal work, regardless of gender.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34546369
pii: 2784395
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26107
pmc: PMC8456385
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2126107Références
Healthc Policy. 2012 Nov;8(2):30-6
pubmed: 23968613
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 31;192(35):E1011-E1017
pubmed: 32868274
Health Econ. 2016 Oct;25(10):1326-40
pubmed: 26239311
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:17-25
pubmed: 23931941
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):22
pubmed: 27271177
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1574-1581
pubmed: 29752581
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):450-5
pubmed: 26384452
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):486-90
pubmed: 26122400
Health Econ. 2015 Sep;24(9):1229-42
pubmed: 26190516
Health Econ. 2011 Oct;20(10):1184-200
pubmed: 20853520
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;26(3):286-292
pubmed: 30664286
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Sep 21;13:94
pubmed: 22998173
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1349-1357
pubmed: 32997909
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;197:23-35
pubmed: 30236775
JAMA Surg. 2019 Dec 1;154(12):1134-1142
pubmed: 31577348