Description of oral behavior during the oral processing of heterogeneous apple purees: An application of the temporal check-all-that-apply method.
TCATA
food oral processing
heterogeneous foods
individual variability
oral behavior
Journal
Journal of texture studies
ISSN: 1745-4603
Titre abrégé: J Texture Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0252052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
08
09
2021
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
pubmed:
24
9
2021
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
23
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to assess the potential of the temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA) method to describe oral behavior from the introduction of products into the mouth until swallowing. In particular, we wanted to test the feasibility of the task, the ability to show differences between composite products, and the possibility of segmenting the panel based on the data collected. Terms referring to actions performed during food oral processing (FOP) were used instead of classical sensory descriptors. The evaluation consisted, for a panel of 54 subjects, of checking the boxes corresponding to the actions in progress throughout the consumption of the products. The five products studied were an apple puree and four heterogeneous mixtures that were obtained by adding gel pieces varying in size (two sizes) and firmness (two levels of firmness). The participants did not encounter any particular difficulty in describing in real time the actions in progress during the consumption of the products. Data collected made it possible to describe the sequences of actions carried out during the FOP and to determine the influence of the presence of pieces of gels, their size and their firmness. We highlighted two groups of subjects presenting different behaviors. The subjects in the first one exhibited little difference in processing between the four samples containing the gel pieces, while the subjects in the second group adapted their behavior according to the firmness of the gel pieces. Overall, this exploratory study suggests the ability of TCATA in describing oral behavior during FOP. Future studies should aim at validating it with objective measurements of FOP.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-173Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Aguayo-Mendoza, M., Santagiuliana, M., Ong, X., Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Scholten, E., & Stieger, M. (2020). How addition of peach gel particles to yogurt affects oral behavior, sensory perception and liking of consumers differing in age. Food Research International, 134, 109213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109213
Aktar, T., Upadhyay, R., & Chen, J. (2019). Sensory and oral processing of semisolid foods. In H. Joyner (Ed.), Rheology of semisolid foods. Food engineering series. (pp. 231-247). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ares, G., Castura, J. C., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B., … Jaeger, S. R. (2016). Comparison of two TCATA variants for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Quality and Preference, 54, 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.006
Carvalho-da-Silva, A. M., Van Damme, I., Wolf, B., & Hort, J. (2011). Characterisation of chocolate eating behaviour. Physiology & Behavior, 104(5), 929-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.001
Castura, J. C., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2016). Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference, 47, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.017
Chen, J. (2009). Food oral processing-A review. Food Hydrocolloids, 23(1), 1-25.
Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., Derks, J. A. M., Ketel, E. C., de Wijk, R. A., & Stieger, M. (2015). Eating behaviour explains differences between individuals in dynamic texture perception of sausages. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.12.006
Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., Tournier, C., Bertrand, D., Salles, C., van de Velde, F., & Stieger, M. (2016). Dynamic texture perception, oral processing behaviour and bolus properties of emulsion-filled gels with and without contrasting mechanical properties. Food Hydrocolloids, 52, 648-660. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015
Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van Delft, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Stieger, M. (2015). Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi-solid food gels: Part 1: Comparison between QDA, progressive profiling and TDS. Food Hydrocolloids, 43, 207-217. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.05.020
Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Stieger, M. (2015). Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi-solid food gels: Part 2: Impact of breakdown behaviour on bolus properties and dynamic texture perception. Food Hydrocolloids, 49, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.037
Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van de Velde, F., & Stieger, M. (2017). Bolus matters: The influence of food oral breakdown on dynamic texture perception. Food and Function, 8(2), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FO01005A
de Wijk, R. A., Janssen, A. M., & Prinz, J. F. (2011). Oral movements and the perception of semi-solid foods. Physiology & Behavior, 104(3), 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.037
Dijksterhuis, G. B., & Piggott, J. R. (2000). Dynamic methods of sensory analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 11(8), 284-290.
Duizer, L. M., Gullett, E. A., & Findlay, C. J. (1996). The relationship between sensory time-intensity, physiological electromyography and instrumental texture profile analysis measurements of beef tenderness. Meat Science, 42(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00022-4
Fuentes, V., Estévez, M., Grebol, N., Ventanas, J., & Ventanas, S. (2014). Application of time-intensity method to assess the sensory properties of Iberian dry-cured ham: Effect of fat content and high-pressure treatment. European Food Research and Technology A, 238, 408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-2113-8
Hutchings, S. C., Foster, K. D., Bronlund, J. E., Lentle, R. G., Jones, J. R., & Morgenstern, M. P. (2011). Mastication of heterogeneous foods: Peanuts inside two different food matrices. Food Quality and Preference, 22(4), 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.12.004
Jeltema, M., Beckley, J., & Vahalik, J. (2015). Model for understanding consumer textural food choice. Food Science & Nutrition, 3(3), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.205
Larsen, D. S., Tang, J., Ferguson, L., Morgenstern, M. P., & James, B. J. (2016). Oral breakdown of texturally complex gel-based model food. Journal of Texture Studies, 47(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12146
Lenfant, F., Loret, C., Pineau, N., Hartmann, C., & Martin, N. (2009). Perception of oral food breakdown. The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite, 52(3), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.03.003
Lorido, L., Estévez, M., Ventanas, J., & Ventanas, S. (2015). Salt and intramuscular fat modulate dynamic perception of flavour and texture in dry-cured hams. Meat Science, 107, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.025
Makame, J., Cronje, T., Emmambux, N. M., & De Kock, H. (2019). Dynamic oral texture properties of selected indigenous complementary porridges used in African communities. Food, 8(6), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060221
Matsuo, K., & Palmer, J. B. (2016). Video fluoroscopic techniques for the study of oral food processing. Current Opinion in Food Science, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.03.004
Panouillé, M., Saint-Eve, A., Déléris, I., Le Bleis, F., & Souchon, I. (2014). Oral processing and bolus properties drive the dynamics of salty and texture perceptions of bread. Food Research International, 62, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.031
Peyron, M.-A., Maskawi, K., Woda, A., Tanguay, R., & Lund, J. P. (1997). Effects of food texture and sample thickness on mandibular movement and hardness assessment during biting in man. Journal of Dental Research, 76, 789-795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760031201
Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., … Köster, E. (2009). Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 450-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.04.005
Saint-Eve, A., Mathieu, V., Mantelet, M., Morgenstern, M. P., & Souchon, I. (2018). Temporal dominance of motions: A new concept to enlighten the links between texture perceptions and oral processing. In 5th international conference on food oral processing. Nottingham, UK.
Salles, C., Chagnon, M.-C., Feron, G., Guichard, E., Laboure, H., Morzel, M., … Yven, C. (2011). In-mouth mechanisms leading to flavor release and perception. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 51(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390903044693
Sharma, M., & Duizer, L. (2019). Characterizing the dynamic textural properties of hydrocolloids in pureed foods-A comparison between TDS and TCATA. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 8(6), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060184
van Eck, A., & Stieger, M. (2020). Oral processing behavior, sensory perception and intake of composite foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 106, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.008
Wilson, A., Jeltema, M., Morgenstern, M. P., Motoi, L., Kim, E., & Hedderley, D. (2018). Comparison of physical chewing measures to consumer typed mouth behavior. Journal of Texture Studies, 49, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12328
Yven, C., Patarin, J., Magnin, A., Labouré, H., Repoux, M., Guichard, E., & Feron, G. (2012). Consequences of individual chewing strategies on bolus rheological properties at the swallowing threshold. Journal of Texture Studies, 43(4), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.2011.00340.x