Diastolic function grading by American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and prediction of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality in a community-based cohort.
diastolic function
heart failure
heart failure readmission
mortality
Journal
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1540-8175
Titre abrégé: Echocardiography
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8511187
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
revised:
25
06
2021
received:
20
10
2020
accepted:
25
08
2021
pubmed:
24
9
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
23
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diastolic function (DF) guidelines have been simplified but lack extensive outcome data. Using a rural university heart failure (HF) database, we assessed whether DF grading could predict HF, HF readmission, and all-cause mortality (ACM). In this single-center retrospective study that included 613 patients in sinus rhythm hospitalized for HF (HF with preserved-254 patients, with mid-range-216 patients, and reduced ejection fraction-143 patients), we recorded demographics, Doppler-echo, Framingham HF score, laboratories, HF readmission, and ACM with follow-up to 2167 days. Diastolic dysfunction (Ddys) parameters (left atrial volume index [LAVI] > 34 ml/m The findings of this study highlight the clinical and prognostic relevance of determining the severity of LV Ddys in patients with HF with regard to HF verification and HF readmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Diastolic function (DF) guidelines have been simplified but lack extensive outcome data. Using a rural university heart failure (HF) database, we assessed whether DF grading could predict HF, HF readmission, and all-cause mortality (ACM).
METHODS
In this single-center retrospective study that included 613 patients in sinus rhythm hospitalized for HF (HF with preserved-254 patients, with mid-range-216 patients, and reduced ejection fraction-143 patients), we recorded demographics, Doppler-echo, Framingham HF score, laboratories, HF readmission, and ACM with follow-up to 2167 days.
RESULTS
Diastolic dysfunction (Ddys) parameters (left atrial volume index [LAVI] > 34 ml/m
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study highlight the clinical and prognostic relevance of determining the severity of LV Ddys in patients with HF with regard to HF verification and HF readmission.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1988-1998Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:107-133.
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1321-1360.
Prasad SB, Lin AK, Guppy-Coles KB, et al. Diastolic dysfunction assessed using contemporary guidelines and prognosis following myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(10):1127-1136.
Sanchis L, Andrea R, Falces C, Poyatos S, Vidal B, Sitges M. Differential clinical implications of current recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(11):1203-1208.
Andersen OS, Smiseth OA, Dokainish H, et al. Estimating Left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(15):1937-1948.
Burgess DC, Hunt D, Li L, et al. Incidence and predictors of silent myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes and the effect of fenofibrate: an analysis from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(1):92-99.
Bonaca MP, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology/World Heart Federation universal definition of myocardial infarction classification system and the risk of cardiovascular death: observations from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38). Circulation. 2012;125:577-583.
Mckee PA, Castelli WP, Mcnamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1441-1446.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233-270.
Vanoverschelde J-LJ, Raphael DA, Robert AR, Cosyns JR. Left ventricular filling in dilated cardiomyopathy: relation to functional class and hemodynamics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1288-1295.
Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Redfield MM, Ilstrup DM, Holmes DR, Tajik AJ. Noninvasive Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with cardiomyopathies: a simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1226-1233.
Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quiñones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a non-invasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1527-1533.
Kim Y-J, Sohn D-W. Mitral annulus velocity in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: prospective study in 200 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:980-985.
Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102:1788-1794.
Mansencal N, Bouvier E, Joseph T, et al. Value of tissue Doppler imaging to predict left ventricular filling pressure in patients with coronary artery disease. Echocardiography. 2004;21:133-138.
Lavine SJ, Sivaganam K, Strom JA. Indexing peak rapid filling velocity to both relaxation and filling volume to estimate left ventricular filling pressures. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(6):646-654.
Whalley GA, Doughty RN, Gamble GD, et al. Pseudonormal mitral filling pattern predicts hospital re-admission in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1787-1795.
Pozzoli M, Capomolla S, Sanarico M, Pinna G, Cobelli F, Tavazzi L. Doppler evaluations of left ventricular diastolic filling and pulmonary wedge pressure provide similar prognostic information in patients with systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1995;129:716-725.
Iwahashi N, Kimura K, Kosuge M, et al. E/e two weeks after onset is a powerful predictor of cardiac death and heart failure in patients with a first-time ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:1290-1298.
Pinamonti B, Di Lenarda A, Sinagra G, Camerini F. Restrictive left ventricular filling pattern in dilated cardiomyopathy assessed by Doppler echocardiography: clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic correlations and prognostic implications. Heart Muscle Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:808-815.
Møller JE, Whalley GA, Dini FL, et al., Meta-Analysis Research Group in Echocardiography (MeRGE) AMI Collaborators. Independent prognostic importance of a restrictive left ventricular filling pattern after myocardial infarction: an individual patient meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis Research Group in Echocardiography acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117(20):2591-2598.
Damy T, Goode KM, Kallvikbacka-Bennett A, et al. Determinants and prognostic value of pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2280-2290.
Cerisano G, Bolognese L, Buonamici P, et al. Prognostic implications of restrictive left ventricular filling in reperfused anterior acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(3):793-799.
Xie G-Y, Berk MR, Smith MD, Gurley JC, Demaria AN. Prognostic value of Doppler transmitral flow patterns in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:132-139.
Faris R, Coats AJS, Henein MY. Echocardiography-derived variables predict outcome in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with or without a restrictive filling pattern. Am Heart J. 2002;144:343-350.
Somaratne JB, Whalley GA, Poppe KK, Gamble GD, Doughty RN. Pseudonormal mitral filling is associated with similarly poor prognosis as restrictive filling in patients with heart failure and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:494-498.
Hillis GS, Møller JE, Pellikka PA, et al. Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/E0 is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:360-367.
Sharma R, Pellerin D, Gaze DC, et al. Mitral peak Doppler E-wave to peak mitral annulus velocity ratio is an accurate estimate of left ventricular filling pressure and predicts mortality in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:266-273.
Lancellotti P, Galderisi M, Edvardsen T, et al. Echo-Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: results of the multicentre EACVI Euro-Filling study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(9):961-968.
Balaney B, Medvedofsky D, Mediratta A, et al. Invasive validation of the echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling pressures using the 2016 diastolic guidelines: head-to-head comparison with the 2009 guidelines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(1):79-88.
Torii Y, Kusunose K, Yamada H, et al. Updated left ventricular diastolic function recommendations and cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure hospitalization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(10):1286-1297.
Liang H-Y, Lo Y-C, Chiang H-Y, Chen M-F, Kuo C-C. Validation and comparison of the 2003 and 2016 diastolic functional assessments for cardiovascular mortality in a large single-center cohort. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(4):469-480.
Johansen ND, Biering-Sørensen T, Jensen JS, Mogelvang R. Diastolic dysfunction revisited: a new, feasible, and unambiguous echocardiographic classification predicts major cardiovascular events. Am Heart J. 2017;188:136-146.
Hansen S, Brainin P, Sengeløv M, et al. Prognostic utility of diastolic dysfunction and speckle tracking echocardiography in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(1):147-157.
Mak GS, Demaria A, Clopton P, Maisel AS. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: comparison with tissue Doppler imaging recordings. Am Heart J. 2004;148(5):895-902.
Zafrir B, Paz H, Wolff R, et al. Mortality rates and modes of death in heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved systolic function. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22(1):53-56.
Wolsk E, Claggett B, Køber L, et al. Contribution of cardiac and extra-cardiac disease burden to risk of cardiovascular outcomes varies by ejection fraction in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(3):504-510.
Vaduganathan M, Cunningham JW, Claggett BL, et al. Worsening heart failure episodes outside a hospital setting in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the PARAGON-HF trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2021;9(5):374-382.