Impact of fetal trisomy 21 on umbilical artery Doppler indices.
Infant, Newborn
Female
Pregnancy
Humans
Adult
Umbilical Arteries
/ diagnostic imaging
Down Syndrome
/ diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
/ methods
Placenta
Fetus
/ diagnostic imaging
Gestational Age
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Fetal Growth Retardation
/ diagnostic imaging
Trisomy
Middle Cerebral Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Doppler index
aneuploidy
trisomy 21
ultrasound
umbilical artery
Journal
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
ISSN: 1476-4954
Titre abrégé: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101136916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
28
9
2021
medline:
24
11
2022
entrez:
27
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Umbilical artery (UA) Doppler indices are surrogate measures of placental function, most commonly used to assess fetal wellbeing in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction. Fetuses with trisomy 21 (t21) are reported to have elevated UA Doppler indices, but reference percentiles are currently lacking for this population. We hypothesized that gestational age-specific values of UA Doppler indices in pregnancies complicated by t21 will be elevated compared to established percentiles based on euploid pregnancies. We aimed to assess UA Doppler indices longitudinally in fetuses with t21 in order to demonstrate Doppler patterns across gestation in this population, compare them with euploid fetuses, and investigate their association with pregnancy outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with confirmed fetal t21 who underwent UA Doppler surveillance antenatally from January 2012 to August 2019. UA Doppler indices, including systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio, pulsatility index (PI), and resistance index (RI) were extracted from ultrasound reports or directly from ultrasound images. UA S/D, PI, and RI percentiles by gestational week were created from available observations from our cohort via a data-driven approach using a generalized additive model. A secondary analysis was run to statistically compare t21 values to established percentiles based on observations from a historical population of euploid fetuses. UA Doppler measurements from 86 t21 fetuses and 130 euploid fetuses were included in our analysis. Median (IQR) maternal age in t21 pregnancies and euploid pregnancies were 35 years (29-38) and 30 years (27-33), respectively. As in euploid fetuses, we found a negative association between Doppler indices and gestational age in the t21 fetuses. Maternal tobacco use, obesity, or chronic hypertension had no significant effect on UA Doppler indices. As hypothesized, values for UA S/D ratio, PI, and RI at the 2.5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, and 97.5th percentiles by gestational week were significantly higher in t21 fetuses compared to euploid fetuses ( At each week of gestation, UA Doppler indices in t21 fetuses were significantly higher than established percentiles from a euploid population. Reference intervals based on euploid fetuses may therefore not be appropriate for antenatal surveillance of fetuses with t21. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the role and impact of serial UA Doppler velocimetry in the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by fetal t21.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34570672
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1974388
pmc: PMC10346994
mid: NIHMS1845552
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8364-8371Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000445
Pays : United States
Références
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;94(8):742-5
pubmed: 3311131
Pediatr Pathol. 1989;9(4):425-31
pubmed: 2798268
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Aug;65(6):1-11
pubmed: 27508894
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Feb 25;38(3):189-96
pubmed: 1826100
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):613-7
pubmed: 25851498
J Reprod Med. 1999 Apr;44(4):346-50
pubmed: 10319304
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):937-44
pubmed: 15746695
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):210-5
pubmed: 9354879
Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 1;130A(4):354-64
pubmed: 15389712
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3469-3475
pubmed: 30741044
Teratology. 1990 Oct;42(4):337-45
pubmed: 2147788
Placenta. 2001 Apr;22 Suppl A:S93-7
pubmed: 11312637
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 May;172(5):1379-87
pubmed: 7755042
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):11-4
pubmed: 8988688
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(4):347-54
pubmed: 3051883
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Apr;103(4):330-4
pubmed: 8605129
Stat Med. 2006 Apr 30;25(8):1369-82
pubmed: 16143984
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;17(5):398-402
pubmed: 11380963
Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1967;45(3):320-2
pubmed: 4230765
J Pediatr. 2008 Jan;152(1):15-9
pubmed: 18154890
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Apr;286(4):H1266-72
pubmed: 14630636
Placenta. 2004 Apr;25 Suppl A:S79-84
pubmed: 15033312
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;10(2):112-20
pubmed: 9286020
Placenta. 2016 Nov;47:24-28
pubmed: 27780536
South Med J. 1994 Jul;87(7):724-7
pubmed: 8023205
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):655-9
pubmed: 3548383
Hypertension. 2019 Nov;74(5):1089-1095
pubmed: 31495278
Am J Med Genet. 1998 Nov 16;80(3):213-7
pubmed: 9843040
Clin Genet. 2009 Feb;75(2):180-4
pubmed: 19021635
BJOG. 2008 Apr;115(5):590-4
pubmed: 18333939
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1204-11
pubmed: 26504127
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Oct;85(10):3700-7
pubmed: 11061527
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Apr;8(2):111-4
pubmed: 2943789
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Feb;(305):1-8
pubmed: 29528282
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jan;182(1 Pt 1):154-8
pubmed: 10649171
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2003;30(4):211-6
pubmed: 14664415
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435
pubmed: 31580536
Placenta. 2020 Jan 1;89:58-66
pubmed: 31683073
J Matern Fetal Med. 2001 Apr;10(2):116-21
pubmed: 11392591
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Dec 15;136(12):1457-64
pubmed: 1288275
Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1990;7:71-4
pubmed: 2149978
Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jul;25(7):608-11
pubmed: 16032775
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Jul;26(11):1086-9
pubmed: 23339291
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):233-39
pubmed: 23371348
Front Physiol. 2016 Feb 05;7:28
pubmed: 26903878