Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort.
Aspirin
/ adverse effects
Cystectomy
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ complications
Urinary Diversion
/ adverse effects
Journal
Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
01
07
2021
revised:
26
07
2021
accepted:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
29
9
2021
medline:
21
4
2022
entrez:
28
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether continuing the antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid≤100mg (ASA) during Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) increases the risk of peri-and postoperative hemorrhagic complications and overall morbidity. Indeed, guidelines recommend interrupting antiplatelet therapy before radical cystectomy; however, RARC with ICUD is associated to reduced estimated blood loss and blood transfusions compared to its open counterpart. Data from a multicentric European database were analyzed. All participating centers maintained a prospective database of patients undergoing RARC with ICUD. We identified patients receiving antiplatelet therapy by acetylsalicylic acid ≤100mg. Patients were divided into three groups: those not taking acetylsalicylic acid (no-ASA), those where ASA was continued perioperatively (c-ASA) and those where ASA was interrupted perioperatively (i-ASA). Estimated blood loss and peri-and post-operative transfusions were recorded. Hemorrhagic complications, ischemic, thrombotic and cardiac morbidity was recorded and classified using the Clavien-Dindo score by a senior urologist. 640 patients were analyzed. Patients on acetylsalicylic acid were significantly older and had more comorbidities. No significant difference was found for estimated blood loss between no-ASA, c-ASA and i-ASA (280 vs. 300 vs. 200ml respectively; P = 0.09). Similarly, no significant difference was found for intraoperative (5% vs. 9% vs. 11%; P = 0.07) and postoperative transfusion rate (11% vs. 13% vs. 18%; P = 0.17). Higher ischemic complications were noted in the i-ASA group compared to no-ASA and c-ASA (4% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.03). On uni and multivariate logistic regression, continuing acetylsalicylic acid was not significantly associated to either major complications or post-operative transfusions. Peri-operative acetylsalicylic acid continuation in RARC with ICUD does not increase hemorrhagic complications. Interrupting acetylsalicylic acid peri-operatively may expose patients to a higher risk of ischemic events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34580028
pii: S1078-1439(21)00388-4
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163.e11-163.e17Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of Interest.