Behavioral gender differences are reinforced during the COVID-19 crisis.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 09 2021
28 09 2021
Historique:
received:
28
01
2021
accepted:
20
08
2021
entrez:
29
9
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
13
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Behavioral gender differences have been found for a wide range of human activities including the way people communicate, move, provision themselves, or organize leisure activities. Using mobile phone data from 1.2 million devices in Austria (15% of the population) across the first phase of the COVID-19 crisis, we quantify gender-specific patterns of communication intensity, mobility, and circadian rhythms. We show the resilience of behavioral patterns with respect to the shock imposed by a strict nation-wide lock-down that Austria experienced in the beginning of the crisis with severe implications on public and private life. We find drastic differences in gender-specific responses during the different phases of the pandemic. After the lock-down gender differences in mobility and communication patterns increased massively, while circadian rhythms tended to synchronize. In particular, women had fewer but longer phone calls than men during the lock-down. Mobility declined massively for both genders, however, women tended to restrict their movement stronger than men. Women showed a stronger tendency to avoid shopping centers and more men frequented recreational areas. After the lock-down, males returned back to normal quicker than women; young age-cohorts return much quicker. Differences are driven by the young and adolescent population. An age stratification highlights the role of retirement on behavioral differences. We find that the length of a day of men and women is reduced by 1 h. We interpret and discuss these findings as signals for underlying social, biological and psychological gender differences when coping with crisis and taking risks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34584107
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97394-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-97394-1
pmc: PMC8478918
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19241Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Sci Data. 2020 Aug 27;7(1):285
pubmed: 32855430
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0164541
pubmed: 27768704
Phys Rev E. 2016 Nov;94(5-1):052319
pubmed: 27967040
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1214
pubmed: 23393616
Behav Res Ther. 2000 Jun;38(6):619-28
pubmed: 10846810
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):982-7
pubmed: 11919308
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2047-2049
pubmed: 32281158
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108 Suppl 3:15602-8
pubmed: 21536890
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):429-36
pubmed: 21047157
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):617-628
pubmed: 30865565
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):365-366
pubmed: 32433639
Risk Anal. 1998 Dec;18(6):805-11
pubmed: 9972583
Int J Psychol. 2020 Feb;55(1):115-122
pubmed: 30474122
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138098
pubmed: 26390215
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7332-6
pubmed: 17456605
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 17;109(29):11576-81
pubmed: 22711804
Nature. 2007 Feb 1;445(7127):489
pubmed: 17268455
Front Big Data. 2020 Oct 26;3:32
pubmed: 33693405
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233410
pubmed: 32407409
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e17680
pubmed: 21479206
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 05;6(23):eabc0764
pubmed: 32548274
Sci Rep. 2012;2:370
pubmed: 22518274
Psychol Rev. 2000 Jul;107(3):411-29
pubmed: 10941275
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112608
pubmed: 25409009