A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
07
12
2020
accepted:
14
09
2021
entrez:
29
9
2021
pubmed:
30
9
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic? To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic. The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted. Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement. Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic?
OBJECTIVE
To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic.
METHODS
The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34587175
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257880
pii: PONE-D-20-38436
pmc: PMC8480845
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0257880Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
CMAJ. 2020 Jul 27;192(30):E868-E869
pubmed: 32719027
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):504-509
pubmed: 32436578
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31
pubmed: 23381514
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jun;22(6):454-461
pubmed: 32396397
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Feb;33(2):216-21
pubmed: 24493763
Healthc Pap. 2017 Oct;17(2):40-45
pubmed: 29595443
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;41(12):1476-1478
pubmed: 32362298
Healthc Pap. 2017 Oct;17(2):8-20
pubmed: 29595439
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e79-e80
pubmed: 32376263
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1326-1330
pubmed: 32392280
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jun;22(6):449-453
pubmed: 32383989
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:42
pubmed: 32699647
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):389.e1-389.e10
pubmed: 32425200
Healthc Q. 2018 Dec;21(SP):12-30
pubmed: 30566400
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89
pubmed: 24568690
Healthc Q. 2018 Dec;21(SP):45-49
pubmed: 30566403
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 6;6(2):e19297
pubmed: 32348293
Comput Human Behav. 2020 Sep;110:106380
pubmed: 32292239
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
PM R. 2020 Sep;12(9):926-932
pubmed: 32424977
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7S):S49-S55
pubmed: 32376163
J Evid Based Med. 2020 May;13(2):168-172
pubmed: 32445287
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1116-1120
pubmed: 32302395
Healthc Manage Forum. 2020 Nov;33(6):288-292
pubmed: 32686506
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1692-1697
pubmed: 32385614
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3
pubmed: 27366130
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:49-54
pubmed: 28551001
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Aug;60(2):e93-e97
pubmed: 32333961
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jul;72(7):871-873
pubmed: 32386125
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):759-69
pubmed: 18474969
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Aug;34(3):276-81
pubmed: 20797357
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(22):3827-3834
pubmed: 32429780
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jul;24(7):1990-1993
pubmed: 32440970
J Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 7;8:24
pubmed: 32288941
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Nurs Open. 2019 Nov 25;7(1):457-465
pubmed: 31871731
Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Jun 11;:
pubmed: 32409432
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
JAMA. 2015 May 5;313(17):1707-8
pubmed: 25812026
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):193
pubmed: 32157233
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1337-1344
pubmed: 32298146
Head Neck. 2020 Jul;42(7):1477-1481
pubmed: 32415893
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):E14-E18
pubmed: 32315076
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138813
pubmed: 32334159
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020 May;21(5):400-404
pubmed: 32425006
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Aug;135:110132
pubmed: 32521358
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2575
pubmed: 32611571