Gammaproteobacteria, a core taxon in the guts of soil fauna, are potential responders to environmental concentrations of soil pollutants.
Antibiotic resistance genes
Gut microbiota
Indicator taxa
Machine learning
Pesticide
Soil invertebrate
Journal
Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 09 2021
30 09 2021
Historique:
received:
11
07
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
entrez:
1
10
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2021
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The ubiquitous gut microbiotas acquired from the environment contribute to host health. The gut microbiotas of soil invertebrates are gradually assembled from the microecological region of the soil ecosystem which they inhabit, but little is known about their characteristics when the hosts are under environmental stress. The rapid development of high-throughput DNA sequencing in the last decade has provided unprecedented insights and opportunities to characterize the gut microbiotas of soil invertebrates. Here, we characterized the core, transient, and rare bacterial taxa in the guts of soil invertebrates using the core index (CI) and developed a new theory of global microbial diversity of soil ecological microregions. We found that the Gammaproteobacteria could respond indiscriminately to the exposure to environmental concentrations of soil pollutants and were closely associated with the physiology and function of the host. Meanwhile, machine-learning models based on metadata calculated that Gammaproteobacteria were the core bacteria with the highest colonization potential in the gut, and further identified that they were the best indicator taxon of the response to environmental concentrations of soil pollution. Gammaproteobacteria also closely correlated with the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes. Our results determined that Gammaproteobacteria were an indicator taxon in the guts of the soil invertebrates that responded to environmental concentrations of soil pollutants, thus providing an effective theoretical basis for subsequent assessments of soil ecological risk. The results of the physiological and biochemical analyses of the host and the microbial-community functions, and the antibiotic resistance of Gammaproteobacteria, provide new insights for evaluating global soil ecological health. Video abstract.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The ubiquitous gut microbiotas acquired from the environment contribute to host health. The gut microbiotas of soil invertebrates are gradually assembled from the microecological region of the soil ecosystem which they inhabit, but little is known about their characteristics when the hosts are under environmental stress. The rapid development of high-throughput DNA sequencing in the last decade has provided unprecedented insights and opportunities to characterize the gut microbiotas of soil invertebrates. Here, we characterized the core, transient, and rare bacterial taxa in the guts of soil invertebrates using the core index (CI) and developed a new theory of global microbial diversity of soil ecological microregions.
RESULTS
We found that the Gammaproteobacteria could respond indiscriminately to the exposure to environmental concentrations of soil pollutants and were closely associated with the physiology and function of the host. Meanwhile, machine-learning models based on metadata calculated that Gammaproteobacteria were the core bacteria with the highest colonization potential in the gut, and further identified that they were the best indicator taxon of the response to environmental concentrations of soil pollution. Gammaproteobacteria also closely correlated with the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results determined that Gammaproteobacteria were an indicator taxon in the guts of the soil invertebrates that responded to environmental concentrations of soil pollutants, thus providing an effective theoretical basis for subsequent assessments of soil ecological risk. The results of the physiological and biochemical analyses of the host and the microbial-community functions, and the antibiotic resistance of Gammaproteobacteria, provide new insights for evaluating global soil ecological health. Video abstract.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34593032
doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01150-6
pii: 10.1186/s40168-021-01150-6
pmc: PMC8485531
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Soil Pollutants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
196Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 15;412:125272
pubmed: 33550129
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 5;53(21):12823-12834
pubmed: 31593455
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):2
pubmed: 25600402
J Hazard Mater. 2016 Jun 5;310:82-8
pubmed: 26900980
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):564-76
pubmed: 21993395
ISME J. 2016 Aug;10(8):1998-2009
pubmed: 26800234
Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:104965
pubmed: 31284112
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;55(11):7445-7455
pubmed: 33977709
Nature. 2017 Nov 30;551(7682):585-589
pubmed: 29143823
Trends Biotechnol. 2015 Sep;33(9):496-503
pubmed: 26210164
Nature. 2012 Jun 13;486(7402):207-14
pubmed: 22699609
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;17(10):635-648
pubmed: 32647386
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 20;740:140008
pubmed: 32562986
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 6;52(5):3081-3090
pubmed: 29378395
Commun Biol. 2020 Dec 4;3(1):737
pubmed: 33277584
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Feb;78(4):1187-97
pubmed: 22156418
Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:105059
pubmed: 31374443
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;103(16):6407-6421
pubmed: 31243501
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130600
pubmed: 26075903
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2491
pubmed: 29410494
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 6;52(21):12748-12756
pubmed: 30345766
Microbiome. 2020 Jun 2;8(1):79
pubmed: 32487269
Nature. 2003 Apr 17;422(6933):711-3
pubmed: 12700759
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 1;10(1):992
pubmed: 30824706
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:197-205
pubmed: 31048151
ISME J. 2021 Mar;15(3):789-806
pubmed: 33139870
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):1148-1159
pubmed: 31806755
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
pubmed: 17840770
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:1183-1190
pubmed: 31018458
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7770-7781
pubmed: 31244079
Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 16;7:11870
pubmed: 27306690
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Jun 9;29(6):975-987.e4
pubmed: 33887206
J Hazard Mater. 2018 Jun 5;351:330-336
pubmed: 29554530
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 18;6:24207
pubmed: 27086581
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 18;52(24):14088-14098
pubmed: 30481457
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Aug;75(15):5111-20
pubmed: 19502440
ISME J. 2021 Jun;15(6):1722-1734
pubmed: 33452480
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jul;80(14):4301-12
pubmed: 24814785
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;37(6):676-684
pubmed: 31036930
Biopsychosoc Med. 2018 May 3;12:7
pubmed: 29743938
Environ Int. 2019 Nov;132:105078
pubmed: 31400601
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
Nat Chem Biol. 2014 Jun;10(6):416-24
pubmed: 24838170
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Nov;22(22):17948-54
pubmed: 26165993
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;77(17):5934-44
pubmed: 21764952
Microb Ecol. 2009 Jul;58(1):189-98
pubmed: 19221834
Science. 2012 May 4;336(6081):608-11
pubmed: 22556258
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 9;115(41):10305-10310
pubmed: 30249635
ISME J. 2020 Dec;14(12):2936-2950
pubmed: 32681158
J Virol. 2012 Aug;86(15):8221-31
pubmed: 22623790
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Apr;19(4):1450-1462
pubmed: 28078754