Sharing Government Health Data With the Private Sector: Community Attitudes Survey.
big data
consent
data linkage
health data
health information systems
private sector
public interest
public opinion
social license
trust
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2021
01 10 2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2020
accepted:
19
05
2021
revised:
21
12
2020
entrez:
1
10
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of government health data for secondary purposes, such as monitoring the quality of hospital services, researching the health needs of populations, and testing how well new treatments work, is increasing. This increase in the secondary uses of health data has led to increased interest in what the public thinks about data sharing, in particular, the possibilities of sharing with the private sector for research and development. Although international evidence demonstrates broad public support for the secondary use of health data, this support does not extend to sharing health data with the private sector. If governments intend to share health data with the private sector, knowing what the public thinks will be important. This paper reports a national survey to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing health data with private companies for research on and development of therapeutic drugs and medical devices. This study aims to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing government health data with the private sector. A web-based survey tool was developed to assess attitudes about sharing government health data with the private sector. A market research company was employed to administer the web-based survey in June 2019. The survey was completed by 2537 individuals residing in Australia. Between 51.8% and 57.98% of all participants were willing to share their data, with slightly fewer in favor of sharing to improve health services (51.99%) and a slightly higher proportion in favor of sharing for research and development (57.98%). There was a preference for opt-in consent (53.44%) and broad support for placing conditions on sharing health information with private companies (62% to 91.99%). Wide variability was also observed in participants' views about the extent to which the private sector could be trusted and how well they would behave if entrusted with people's health information. In their qualitative responses, the participants noted concerns about private sector corporate interests, corruption, and profit making and expressed doubt about the Australian government's capacity to manage data sharing safely. The percentages presented are adjusted against the Australian population. This nationally representative survey provides preliminary evidence that Australians are uncertain about sharing their health data with the private sector. Although just over half of all the respondents supported sharing health data with the private sector, there was also strong support for strict conditions on sharing data and for opt-in consent and significant concerns about how well the private sector would manage government health data. Addressing public concern about sharing government health data with the private sector will require more and better engagement to build community understanding about how agencies can collect, share, protect, and use their personal data.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The use of government health data for secondary purposes, such as monitoring the quality of hospital services, researching the health needs of populations, and testing how well new treatments work, is increasing. This increase in the secondary uses of health data has led to increased interest in what the public thinks about data sharing, in particular, the possibilities of sharing with the private sector for research and development. Although international evidence demonstrates broad public support for the secondary use of health data, this support does not extend to sharing health data with the private sector. If governments intend to share health data with the private sector, knowing what the public thinks will be important. This paper reports a national survey to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing health data with private companies for research on and development of therapeutic drugs and medical devices.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to explore public attitudes in Australia toward sharing government health data with the private sector.
METHODS
A web-based survey tool was developed to assess attitudes about sharing government health data with the private sector. A market research company was employed to administer the web-based survey in June 2019.
RESULTS
The survey was completed by 2537 individuals residing in Australia. Between 51.8% and 57.98% of all participants were willing to share their data, with slightly fewer in favor of sharing to improve health services (51.99%) and a slightly higher proportion in favor of sharing for research and development (57.98%). There was a preference for opt-in consent (53.44%) and broad support for placing conditions on sharing health information with private companies (62% to 91.99%). Wide variability was also observed in participants' views about the extent to which the private sector could be trusted and how well they would behave if entrusted with people's health information. In their qualitative responses, the participants noted concerns about private sector corporate interests, corruption, and profit making and expressed doubt about the Australian government's capacity to manage data sharing safely. The percentages presented are adjusted against the Australian population.
CONCLUSIONS
This nationally representative survey provides preliminary evidence that Australians are uncertain about sharing their health data with the private sector. Although just over half of all the respondents supported sharing health data with the private sector, there was also strong support for strict conditions on sharing data and for opt-in consent and significant concerns about how well the private sector would manage government health data. Addressing public concern about sharing government health data with the private sector will require more and better engagement to build community understanding about how agencies can collect, share, protect, and use their personal data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34596573
pii: v23i10e24200
doi: 10.2196/24200
pmc: PMC8520136
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e24200Informations de copyright
©Annette Braunack-Mayer, Belinda Fabrianesi, Jackie Street, Pauline O'Shaughnessy, Stacy M Carter, Lina Engelen, Lucy Carolan, Rebecca Bosward, David Roder, Kylie Sproston. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.10.2021.
Références
Clin Trials. 2013;10(3):483-94
pubmed: 23568940
J Community Genet. 2017 Jul;8(3):173-181
pubmed: 28382417
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Mar;24(3):338-43
pubmed: 26081642
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):73
pubmed: 27832780
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Jan 16;3:6
pubmed: 30854470
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):43-50
pubmed: 27638832
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 13;20(12):e11254
pubmed: 30545807
Digit Health. 2019 Apr 29;5:2055207619847017
pubmed: 31069106
Sci Public Policy. 2016 Oct;43(5):713-723
pubmed: 28066123
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 21;21(2):e11985
pubmed: 30789346
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e18582
pubmed: 33185553
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193
pubmed: 20181324
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:29-35
pubmed: 27151552
J Med Ethics. 2020 May 18;:
pubmed: 32424061
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:86-94
pubmed: 31029268
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17214
pubmed: 33112247
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):489-500
pubmed: 28321561
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):404-9
pubmed: 25617016
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 28;20(3):e112
pubmed: 29592847
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 21;21(8):e14384
pubmed: 31436163
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):663-71
pubmed: 26583683
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Apr;24(2):53-54
pubmed: 30523135
J Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 12;:
pubmed: 31719155
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e18181
pubmed: 32589160
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0180986
pubmed: 28727834
CMAJ Open. 2019 Feb 3;7(1):E40-E46
pubmed: 30718354