Establishing Clinical Ethics Committees in Primary Care: A Study from Norwegian Municipal Care.

Clinical ethics Clinical ethics committee Clinical ethics support Community care Home care Municipal care Nursing home Primary care

Journal

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues
ISSN: 1572-8498
Titre abrégé: HEC Forum
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8917455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
accepted: 21 09 2021
medline: 10 5 2023
pubmed: 2 10 2021
entrez: 1 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Would primary care services benefit from the aid of a clinical ethics committee (CEC)? The implementation of CECs in primary care in four Norwegian municipalities was supported and their activities followed for 2.5 years. In this study, the CECs' structure and activities are described, with special emphasis on what characterizes the cases they have discussed. In total, the four CECs discussed 54 cases from primary care services, with the four most common topics being patient autonomy, competence and coercion; professionalism; cooperation and disagreement with next of kin; and priority setting, resource use and quality. Nursing homes and home care were the primary care services most often involved. Next of kin were present in 10 case deliberations, whereas patients were never present. The investigation indicates that it might be feasible for new CECs to attain a high level of activity including case deliberations within the time frame. It also confirms that significant, characteristic and complex moral problems arise in primary care services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34596811
doi: 10.1007/s10730-021-09461-9
pii: 10.1007/s10730-021-09461-9
pmc: PMC8485308
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

201-214

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 Jan 22;138(2):
pubmed: 29357618
J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):66-70
pubmed: 31488518
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jun 06;16:40
pubmed: 26048681
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1852-1861.e8
pubmed: 32736991
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):94-103
pubmed: 34254541
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):628-644
pubmed: 33334250
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Jan 21;131(2):118-21
pubmed: 21267026
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;21(1):82
pubmed: 32873310
J Med Ethics. 2014 Oct;40(10):678-82
pubmed: 24047567
J Med Ethics. 2014 Sep;40(9):625-31
pubmed: 24578386
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):950-2
pubmed: 15087349

Auteurs

Morten Magelssen (M)

Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. morten.magelssen@medisin.uio.no.

Heidi Karlsen (H)

Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Lisbeth Thoresen (L)

Department for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society , University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH