Review: Improving the nutritional, sensory and market value of meat products from sheep and cattle.


Journal

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
ISSN: 1751-732X
Titre abrégé: Animal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101303270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 05 03 2021
revised: 02 08 2021
accepted: 13 08 2021
pubmed: 4 10 2021
medline: 17 12 2021
entrez: 3 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper focuses on improving the sensory, health attributes and meat yield of beef and lamb meats. Value for meat is defined as the weight of meat × price/kg received with price linked to eating quality. To maximise value across the supply chain, accurate carcass grading systems for eating quality and yield are paramount. Grading data can then be used to target consumers' needs at given price points and then to tailor appropriate production and genetic directions. Both the grading methodologies and key phenotypes are complex and still under intensive research with international collaboration to maximise opportunities. In addition, there is value in promoting the health aspects of red meats served as whole trimmed meats. Typically, the total fat content is relatively low (less than 5%) and for forage systems, they deliver a very significant content of long-chain n-3 fatty acids. Further research is needed to clarify the healthiness or otherwise of ground beef served as burgers given the fat content is typically 20% or more. It is important to continue to improve the feedback to producers regarding the quantity and quality of the products they produce to target new value opportunities in a transparent and quantitative manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34600858
pii: S1751-7311(21)00199-3
doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100356
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fatty Acids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100356

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

D W Pethick (DW)

Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. Electronic address: d.pethick@murdoch.edu.au.

J-F Hocquette (JF)

INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgroSup, UMR1213, Recherches sur les Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France.

N D Scollan (ND)

Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT95HN, UK.

F R Dunshea (FR)

Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Faculty of Biological Sciences, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH