Evaluation and validation of detailed and simplified models of the uncertainty of unified [Formula: see text] measurements in aqueous solutions.

Differential potentiometry Monte Carlo method Uncertainty Unified pH scale Validation

Journal

Analytica chimica acta
ISSN: 1873-4324
Titre abrégé: Anal Chim Acta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 03 07 2021
revised: 04 08 2021
accepted: 05 08 2021
entrez: 4 10 2021
pubmed: 5 10 2021
medline: 6 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of the unified pH concept, [Formula: see text] , applicable to aqueous and non-aqueous solutions, which allows interpreting and comparison of the acidity of different types of solutions, requires reliable and objective determination. The [Formula: see text] can be determined by a single differential potentiometry measurement referenced to an aqueous reference buffer or by a ladder of differential potentiometric measurements that allows minimisation of inconsistencies of various determinations. This work describes and assesses bottom-up evaluations of the uncertainty of these measurements, where uncertainty components are combined by the Monte Carlo Method (MCM) or Taylor Series Approximation (TSM). The MCM allows a detailed simulation of the measurements, including an iterative process involving in minimising ladder deviations. On the other hand, the TSM requires the approximate determination of minimisation uncertainty. The uncertainty evaluation was successfully applied to measuring aqueous buffers with pH of 2.00, 4.00, 7.00, and 10.00, with a standard uncertainty of 0.01. The reference and estimated values from both approaches are metrologically compatible for a 95% confidence level even when a negligible contribution of liquid junction potential uncertainty is assumed. The MCM estimated pH values with an expanded uncertainty, for the 95% confidence level, between 0.26 and 0.51, depending on the pH value and ladder inconsistencies. The minimisation uncertainty is negligible or responsible for up to 87% of the measurement uncertainty. The TSM quantified measurement uncertainties on average only 0.05 units larger than the MCM estimated ones. Additional experimental tests should be performed to test these uncertainty models for analysis performed in other laboratories and on non-aqueous solutions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34602195
pii: S0003-2670(21)00749-2
doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338923
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

338923

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ricardo J N Bettencourt da Silva (RJNB)

Centro de Química Estutural, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Ed. C8, Campo Grande, 1649-016, Lisboa, Portugal. Electronic address: rjsilva@fc.ul.pt.

Jaan Saame (J)

University of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.

Bárbara Anes (B)

Centro de Química Estutural, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Ed. C8, Campo Grande, 1649-016, Lisboa, Portugal.

Agnes Heering (A)

University of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.

Ivo Leito (I)

University of Tartu, Institute of Chemistry, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.

Teemu Näykki (T)

Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Laboratory Centre, Mustialankatu 3, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.

Daniela Stoica (D)

Laboratoire National de Metrologie et D'Essais, 1 Rue Gaston Boissier, 75015, Paris, France.

Lisa Deleebeeck (L)

DFM A/S, Kogle Allé 5, 2970, Hørsholm, Denmark.

Frank Bastkowski (F)

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116, Braunschweig, Germany.

Alan Snedden (A)

DFM A/S, Kogle Allé 5, 2970, Hørsholm, Denmark.

M Filomena Camões (MF)

Centro de Química Estutural, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Ed. C8, Campo Grande, 1649-016, Lisboa, Portugal.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Clinical Competence Male Female

A computational model for bacteriophage ϕX174 gene expression.

Alexis M Hill, Tanvi A Ingle, Claus O Wilke
1.00
Gene Expression Regulation, Viral Promoter Regions, Genetic Bacteriophage phi X 174 Computer Simulation Models, Genetic

Classifications MeSH