Comparative cytogenetics of Serrasalmidae (Teleostei: Characiformes): The relationship between chromosomal evolution and molecular phylogenies.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 11 06 2021
accepted: 15 09 2021
entrez: 7 10 2021
pubmed: 8 10 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Serrasalmidae has high morphological and chromosomal diversity. Based on molecular hypotheses, the family is currently divided into two subfamilies, Colossomatinae and Serrasalminae, with Serrasalminae composed of two tribes: Myleini (comprising most of pacus species) and Serrasalmini (represented by Metynnis, Catoprion, and remaining piranha's genera). This study aimed to analyze species of the tribes Myleini (Myloplus asterias, M. lobatus, M. rubripinnis, M. schomburgki, and Tometes camunani) and Serrasalmini (Metynnis cuiaba, M. hypsauchen, and M. longipinnis) using classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques in order to understand the chromosomal evolution of the family. The four species of the genus Myloplus and T. camunani presented 2n = 58 chromosomes, while the species of Metynnis presented 2n = 62 chromosomes. The distribution of heterochromatin occurred predominantly in pericentromeric regions in all species. Tometes camunani and Myloplus spp. presented only one site with 5S rDNA. Multiple markers of 18S rDNA were observed in T. camunani, M. asterias, M. lobatus, M. rubripinnis, and M. schomburgkii. For Metynnis, however, synteny of the 18S and 5S rDNA was observed in the three species, in addition to an additional 5S marker in M. longipinnis. These data, when superimposed on the phylogeny of the family, suggest a tendency to increase the diploid chromosome number from 54 to 62 chromosomes, which occurred in a nonlinear manner and is the result of several chromosomal rearrangements. In addition, the different karyotype formulas and locations of ribosomal sequences can be used as cytotaxonomic markers and assist in the identification of species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34618832
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258003
pii: PONE-D-21-19222
pmc: PMC8496811
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Ribosomal 0
Heterochromatin 0
RNA, Ribosomal, 18S 0
RNA, Ribosomal, 5S 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0258003

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;158(1):38-45
pubmed: 31079097
J Fish Biol. 2010 Apr;76(5):1117-27
pubmed: 20409165
Genome. 1993 Apr;36(2):372-6
pubmed: 18469994
Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Sep 11;19(17):4780
pubmed: 1891373
Evol Dev. 2019 Sep;21(5):278-293
pubmed: 31449734
Genes (Basel). 2019 May 15;10(5):
pubmed: 31096658
Genet Mol Biol. 2020 Feb 27;43(1):e20190131
pubmed: 31454404
Genetica. 2002 Apr;114(3):231-6
pubmed: 12206361
Comp Cytogenet. 2016 Nov 4;10(4):555-570
pubmed: 28123678
Biotech Histochem. 2012 Oct;87(7):433-8
pubmed: 22747174
Genet Mol Biol. 2014 Mar;37(1):46-53
pubmed: 24688290
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0170053
pubmed: 28422969
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jul;36(1):135-53
pubmed: 15904862
Comp Cytogenet. 2011 Nov 09;5(4):301-13
pubmed: 24260637
Zebrafish. 2016 Apr;13(2):118-31
pubmed: 26840804
Syst Biol. 2021 Apr 15;70(3):576-592
pubmed: 32785670
Evolution. 2019 Feb;73(2):329-345
pubmed: 30426469
Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8387
pubmed: 29849152
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020;160(1):29-37
pubmed: 32092757
Zebrafish. 2016 Feb;13(1):19-25
pubmed: 26625282
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Dec;81:242-57
pubmed: 25261120
Zebrafish. 2017 Apr;14(2):155-160
pubmed: 28067606
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(5):363-7
pubmed: 10515211
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan 13;1(2):20
pubmed: 28812610
Comp Cytogenet. 2016 Jan 22;10(1):77-95
pubmed: 27186339
Exp Cell Res. 1972 Nov;75(1):304-6
pubmed: 4117921
J Mol Evol. 1996 Feb;42(2):169-82
pubmed: 8919869
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Dec;153:106945
pubmed: 32861778
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):2934-8
pubmed: 3458254

Auteurs

Ramon Marin Favarato (RM)

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Conservação e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Leila Braga Ribeiro (LB)

Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Roraima, Avenida Capitão Ene Garcêz, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil.

Alber Campos (A)

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Conservação e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Jorge Ivan Rebelo Porto (JIR)

Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Celeste Mutuko Nakayama (CM)

Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Rafaela Priscila Ota (RP)

Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Eliana Feldberg (E)

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Conservação e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Petrópolis, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH