Perceptions and practices of Australian cattle farmers for the treatment of pinkeye (infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis).


Journal

Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 31 07 2021
revised: 24 09 2021
accepted: 26 09 2021
pubmed: 8 10 2021
medline: 1 12 2021
entrez: 7 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pinkeye or infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis is a globally significant disease and occurs in every state of Australia. Economic loss due to pinkeye can be considerable and it is a major welfare concern, but not all cattle with the disease are treated by farmers. This study was conducted to understand the perceptions and practices of Australian farmers regarding the treatment of pinkeye: factors influencing when farmers treat pinkeye, treatments used and considered effective, and reasons for not treating. Data were gathered using a custom designed online questionnaire. Farmer responses suitable for assessment (n = 985) were analysed using descriptive analyses along with univariable and multivariable ordinal logistic regression models to evaluate the association of 15 explanatory variables with the outcome "when do you treat pinkeye?". Results revealed three variables, farm size, times yarded and ranking of the pain caused by pinkeye, were significantly associated with the frequency of pinkeye treatment. Specifically, farmers with smaller farm sizes were more likely to treat their cattle for pinkeye more frequently. So too were those who yarded their cattle more, and those that rated pinkeye as highly painful. The most used treatments for pinkeye in Australia were pinkeye ointments (n = 861), followed by eye patches (n = 637), pinkeye spray (n = 623), fly control (n = 507), and pinkeye powder (n = 408). Over half of those who had used subconjunctival injection, pinkeye ointments, eye patches, injectable antibiotics and veterinarians rated them as highly effective treatments. Kerosene is still used by some farmers (n = 106). The most common reason for not treating pinkeye was that it was 'too difficult to treat individuals'. These findings provide insight into the attitudes of Australian farmers to the treatment of pinkeye and should be used to improve pinkeye outcomes in cattle.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34619570
pii: S0167-5877(21)00248-8
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105504
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105504

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mac Kneipp (M)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia.

Alexandra C Green (AC)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia.

Merran Govendir (M)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia.

Michael Laurence (M)

Murdoch University, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, 90 South Street, WA, 6150, Australia.

Navneet K Dhand (NK)

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia. Electronic address: navneet.dhand@sydney.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH